Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Grow up or get out
Published on March 24, 2004 By Draginol In Blogging

In many ways, JoeUser is an experiement. It is the only blog site on the Internet that combines the strengths of all the individual bloggers together. When you make a post or comment on someone blog, it is distributed across the thousands of blogs here on this site. And, because JoeUser.com is so popular, your article is likely to get picked up on search engines.

Which, needless to say, creates a temptation for abuse. People who intentionally try to humiliate others by taking advantage of these features.  After some discussion internally, we've decided how we're going to react to this.

1) You may NOT create attack articles about other individuals on this site with your blog site using the person's name or derivative of that name as part of the article title.

2) You should avoid criticizing other users of this blog, by name, in your articles if you have black listed or prevented them in some other way from commenting on your article. Generally speaking, it's cheesy to abuse other people in your article.

3) Related to #2, it IS OKAY to write a counter article. That is, if you disagree with someone else's article, you can certainly reference that article (linking to it is fine) and disagree with the article.

4) Debate the issue don't attack the person. I'm getting so sick of reading flame articles by people that are nothing but hate mongering against other people. I don't care if you think someone else is racist, homophobic, atheist, fanatically religious, whatever. It's irrelevant. If you disagree, then disagree. Explain why you disagree. But to just say "You're a racist" or "You're going to burn in hell" or some other nonsense is obnoxious. 

Bottom line: If you want your blog to be full of hatred towards someone else, then go away. We didn't put all this effort to let people's blogs get a lot of attention so that people could use it as a blunt instrument to attack other individuals by name.

One other note: I also get tired of those who think they have some first amendment right to heap personal abuse on people. You want to write a "I hate <insert person's name here>" articles, go make your own site. Whiney "You're a facist, you're censoring me" articles get old in a hurry.

JoeUser is meant to be a place where intelligent thoughtful people of ALL political persuasions can get together and talk about whatever they want. And they can't very well do that if they have to worry that some hate monger is going to write up a post entitled "<User X> is a jerk!" or whatever.


Comments (Page 6)
6 PagesFirst 4 5 6 
on Mar 26, 2004
Umm... if you want to look for a bad one just go look at 'deleted'. I haven't checked it out myself but from the sounds of things he's not a good person.

Capt. over and out!
on Mar 27, 2004
I'm pretty sure his blog has been deleted, Cpt. Cornbread.

~Dan
on Mar 27, 2004
I would have responded but I have been locked out of my blog site for the last two days.

Those who say there are limitations are missing the point. And not one person answers the question: Who has the moral right to censor on this site? I say the blogger of his/her site and not the owner, when no complaint has been made.

Those of you who are new here have no context in the discussion, because you have not witnessed the slow degrees of censorship that have occured here over the last three months. I make the point it is part of a larger problem the owners have with certain points of view, not politically correct to them. The nonsense of censorship by Citizens is not a legal one, but a moral one.

You create your own 'hypothetical' censorship of 'insulting' 'attack' flame' and this is nowhere said by the owner. He merely says he decides. I stood for all in my reply and have no problem with the un-popular position. The fact I was locked out after posting a reply speaks for itself, I am not the only person who this has happened to here. Experience will teach you what I was saying, new bloggers.

The employees of Stardock, Inc. are a reflection of the company and if they are comfortable with such, then so am I. Each people have the government they deserve, and this blog-God is your new gift. "Satiric" and "jestful" is not open to discussion, Dedalus, only Brad's opinion of your title from now on. Go ask, "Tech-Cat".

Like you, I will be un-affected by the new rule. It is principle I stand for and the line I drew is washed away. History speaks on such matters, and my words are where they belong. How about yours fellow Citizen-blogger?
on May 03, 2004
I confess that most of that comment went over my head, Wakhonta... but check out my newest blog for something on the subject.

~Buddha
on May 03, 2004
Wahkonta, you sound like a spoiled kid wanting to do anything with "his room".  Guess what, you not only have no ownership, you don't even pay rent.  Brad can make up rules as he goes if he wishes.  You can cry "life isn't fair" until the cows come home.  As long as you are living under his roof you will do as he says.  Don't like it, get your own place.  As KharmaGirl has said, JU is not a Democracy.
6 PagesFirst 4 5 6