Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Worst US Presidents in history
Published on May 25, 2007 By Draginol In Politics

Worst Modern Presidents in my opinion and why:

#1 Johnson. He created the "Great Society" which resulted in a massive entitlement culture that has created multiple generations of dependents and an ever increasing drain on society with little to show for it.  He also got us into Vietnam with a strategy that makes Iraq look like a masterpiece.

#2 Carter. Incompetent on so many levels. His handling of the domestic economy showed a complete lack of understanding of economics. His foreign policy was a disaster -- every time we hear about a nuclear Iran, think Jimmy Carter. It was his decision to not support the Shah that we have the Iran we have. His handling of the hostage crisis was demoralizing. And like many American liberals, he believes in showing his own principle by having othres sacrifice such as his boycotting the 1980 Summer Olympics.

#3 George W. Bush. Incompetent to the extreme. The man with no ideology. It's as if that lazy sales guy you know somehow managed to become President. Inept and inarticulate. He has wrecked the Republican party for the forseable future. More prone to croneyism than any modern President. Encouraged reckless spending in congress while still managing to get no credit for being "compassionate" even as he expanded entitlements, supports amnesty on immigration, and bloated up the EPA and Education budgets. Too stupid to manage foreign policy, he ignored advice from people who actually know what they're talking about to stick by his buddies who took a successful liberation of Iraq and turned it into a mess. 

#4 Woodrow Wilson.  The racist, elitist, knows-better-than-you President got the US into World War I, a war in which the US had zero interest in and cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans.  Anyone who thinks Iraq was something we shouldn't have been involved in and mourns the 3,000 American dead, then you should really despise Wilson.

#5 Warren G. Harding. Having him on this list is like shooting a fish in a barrel. Of course he was awful but he didn't really do any serious damage either. He was just a petty, corrupt, blah blah blah.  But he corruptness didn't result in 117,000 American deaths like Wilson's did or set up his country for long-term economic disaster like Johnson or destroy his political party like Bush.  So while Harding was a bad President, he was mostly harmless.


Comments (Page 4)
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4 
on Jun 01, 2007
#3 George W. Bush. Incompetent to the extreme. The man with no ideology. It's as if that lazy sales guy you know somehow managed to become President.


when bush was "elected" in 2000 (and i use quotes because of the controversy, not my personal feelings)i was commenting about how he was like that guy (or gal) who "falls up the corporate ladder." that i am sure that most who work in a company with more tha n a dozen people can relate to. before 9/11 people on both sides of the aisle would agree with me. after 9/11, we all "rallied round the flag" and gave bush our full support on the whole in this country.

i wrote an op-ed 2 weeks after 9/11 commenting on whatever we do, it had better be "swift and severe" and that the world would forgive us for being a little sloppy for a little while, but that sentiment would eventually change. at the time, the arab states for the most part were giving us support and the subtle word was put out that in the stricter muslim sects, the "eye for an eye" justice applied here.

now, on one hand, it is vindicating to see the country wake up to the fact that bush & co. are not as advertised. on the other, and more important hand, it really does sadden me to have been right here. i, like many who opposed the iraq war really did want to be wrong about them and their decisions. when i discuss these issues on or off line with neoconservatives or their apologists and defenders, that point often gets missed early and often.

but all anyone had to do was look into the man's past to see he was one of those people who seemingly "prove" the dilbert principle and everything you ever heard about rich folks kids.

the man ruined a pretty good baseball team...traded a guy who would hit more home runs than 99% of anyone who ever put on a uniform. but that wasn't all, he was just a bad owner and was run out of the league in a very short time.

he might be the only texas oil man who couldn't find oil.

his national guard service, while the debate over it got pushed into a ridiculous realm, was not anything anyone could be proud of. questionably meeting the "minumum requirememnts" in the air guard which was a haven for folks who wanted to avoid vietnam but didn't want to look like a "hippie" at the time is nothing to brag about.

his "messianic" attitude about himself should have been a clear warning. combine that with a "12 step mentality" and ya got trouble.

those of us who knew who dick cheney was before 2000 knew that he was trouble. when he announced he was the winner of his fact finding search, any thinking person should have saw the wrongness in that. it was obvious that cheney was going to be the "man behind the curtain." the merging of the neoconservatives and religious right was completed with that ticket.

the biggest irony to me is that cheney's 2000 convention statement, about the clinton's "lectures. legalisms and carefully worded denials" has become the administration's mantra at a level that would even make the clinton's blush. unfortunately, they never delivered on any "siff doses of truth" that were promised.



4 PagesFirst 2 3 4