Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on January 20, 2008 By Draginol In Gaming

 2008-01-20_1404 2008-01-20_1421

 

2008-01-20_1516 2008-01-20_1522


Comments
on Jan 21, 2008
I may be overdoing myself with the following observation but... if only "concept driven coders" could slap us all a similar engine with adaptable features and relative functions straight inside and beyond the TA-Expansion (incl, the projected GC2/editors!), i'd amazed and confused if no equivalent power is ported as is or even, better!

Pins or Sins, Gins & Bins - the whole reasoning stands almost only on principle X: Value.

- Zyxpsilon.
on Jan 21, 2008
I may be overdoing myself with the following observation but... if only "concept driven coders" could slap us all a similar engine with adaptable features and relative functions straight inside and beyond the TA-Expansion (incl, the projected GC2/editors!), i'd amazed and confused if no equivalent power is ported as is or even, better!

Pins or Sins, Gins & Bins - the whole reasoning stands almost only on principle X: Value.

- Zyxpsilon.


Uh... What???????????????
on Jan 25, 2008
I meant that the 'sneak' pics posted by draginol made me wonder if a SIMILAR 3d-engine or/and some graphic features could be applied to the GC2 framework or interface.
Concept wise, Sins should look more modern while taking a different approach at galactic-like-conquest gameplay.
Sure, GC doesn't have some of these principles... but the feeling i got when seeing how Sins has been designed is that the menus/sidebars/fonts/colors (etc) were slick and pretty, user-friendly and nevertheless, new enough to appeal even the most wacky tough fans of GC and its expansions.

- Zyxpsilon.