Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on February 24, 2008 By Draginol In GalCiv Journals

 

Every year it's the same thing. I get emails asking me if I'm going to have time at GDC to meet with them about some game, industry partnership, licensing opportunity, etc. And each year I respond "Sorry, I won't be at the GDC" (Game Developer's Conference).

They're almost universally shocked that I don't attend. It's not that I'm boycotting it. I think the GDC is a great conference. I just don't see what particular benefit it would be to go. 

From a social aspect, I'm only in contact with two game developers outside Stardock who would attend (Soren Johnson who's working on Spore these days and Adel Chaveleh at Timegate, makers of Kohan and other great games). That's it. And even that's only a few times a year.  I have some friends who work at Microsoft and Ensemble and Blizzard but they're not likely to attend either.

When I have gone, I always feel like a total outsider. Like there's a club that I don't know how to join.  It's pretty much the same feeling I get about the "Association of Shareware producers" (there's a whole shareware industry thing too).

Whenever I stick my foot in the water, I just get that "it's a private club" feeling. Not an exclusionary one necessarily just one that I'm not part of.  

Of course, the PC game industry itself is kind of a club, one which Stardock in general and myself in particular aren't really part of.  We're about as unconnected as you can get. 

It generally doesn't have much impact on our actual business. We miss some industry awards and some glory as as a result.  TotalGaming.net, for instance, is probably the 2nd or possibly 3rd most popular digital distribution system out there but if there's a round up of them in the media, we'll manage to be ignored because we're not on the radar of those in the industry. The millions we make are never measured or counted by anyone in the industry.  Our alternative to DRM (SSD - Secure Software Deliver) never gets much mention even though I suspect that the future is going to be some combination of the two anyway. The guys from Starforce are more likely to get on a panel discussing dealing with piracy than any of us are.

I wish GDC wasn't held this time of year.  If it were held in May (for instance), when the industry is in its slower mode, then it would be easier to go.  But with 3 major game titles due out by the end of June (Sins is already out, GalCiv II: Twilight of the Arnor is due in about a month and The Political Machine 2008 is due in June) it's hard to justify the time to go.

So anyway, that's why I don't go.

-Brad Wardell (Frogboy/Draginol)


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 27, 2008

I suspect though that what will happen is that Microsoft will implement something like that into Games Explorer. Even now, we're forced to have our games run from the Microsoft Games Explorer (MGE) on Vista.  All that's left is putting protection on that so that the games are encrypted under it. Then you could instal lthe game to as many PCs as you want but you wouldn't be able to distribute them via torrents or whatever very easily since the actual "thing" is an encrypted blob that requires MGE to descrypt and run.
I think if this happened I'd ditch PC gaming altogether. It's bad enough already that I can't put my files and saves where I want to.

on Feb 27, 2008
Personaly I think this is a good idea, although if it's implamented badly then hell will brake loose from within microsoft and devour the universe.
on Feb 27, 2008
Personaly I think this is a good idea
Nothing that takes control of what goes where on my own damn pc away from me, and gives it to someone else, is a good idea.

on Feb 28, 2008
I read an interesting comment from an Executive at EA in a news article on Gamespot (http://www.gamespot.com/news/6186239.html?tag=top_stories;title;18) about which titles they decide to produce.

Now I'll be the first one to say EA is just bad for the industry considering the "quality" of game that gets released (read: bloated and buggy), but some of my favorite titles have been under the EA brand (C&C, Sim City 4, Battlefield 2, ... Spore). It seems to me that EA is just like much of the big Hollywood Movie studios. They produce some gems, but for every one gem there are 3 - 5 other games that are hot steaming piles of poo.

I think that publishers like Stardock get the freedom to experiment and make something its customer base is excited and happy with as well, even though it won't make the millions like perhaps a Blizzard, EA, Sierra title might make. But what I like most about Stardock and its Software teams is that you're just as passionate about making a fun and technically challenging game as you are about playing it. I was surprised that late last year you had a poll about when to release TA. You would never see such an act by "elite" studios.

So if skipping GDC means being independent and bucking the trends then by all means stay home, plan your next vacation, play with your kids, talk to the wife, have a BBQ, and play some GalCiv2.
on Feb 28, 2008
If that happened, people would stop buying Vista in droves- or you'd probably see the PC market get fragmented and then destroyed.

Stardock and many others would lose a ton of money, so it wouldn't happen.

on Feb 28, 2008
If that happened, people would stop buying Vista in droves- or you'd probably see the PC market get fragmented and then destroyed.Stardock and many others would lose a ton of money, so it wouldn't happen.


I personally don't know anyone who is buying Vista in droves?
Even my company always asks for XP for Windows machines.

If Vista/MS however does that, I imagine it would leave things open for other operating systems to get some more games.

Right now Games is the only reason half the people I know still use Windows, rather then OS X or Linux for example.

But I believe this will change.
Spore is one game quoted on this thread - And its being released for OS X as well as Windows.

I consider this important personally, as if it takes off on OS X, I would expect others to follow suit.

If that happens, it would have an impact on MS's ability to force their control on game developers.

Lets also not forget that MS just got slapped with a huge fine for doing that exact same thing to application developers, and new cases are being reviewed by the EU now.

I can't see the EU allowing MS to have such control on games.

TG, Stream, others I expect would file suit, and winning wouldn't be difficult - There is certainly precedence for it.
2 Pages1 2