Brad' site where he mouths off about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on September 5, 2008 By Draginol In Republican

I've written about this many times in the past but one of the more off putting features of American liberals is their smugness.  If you disagree with them it is only because you are either ignorant or evil. This tends to result in them losing elections. Often.

I just read a very interesting blog about this that I thought I'd share here:

This conceit of liberals -- which sometimes I think is all that sustains them, and all that keeps them liberals in the first place -- that liberals have some sort of a monopoly on brains, wit, taste, and, yes, even basic humanity will be their undoing. It always is. They keep making the same mistakes over and over and over and over again, and we're the dumb ones.

They, the ones who have made the same ten mistakes every single election since 1968, are the smart ones. Right?

Let's check the list: Demean an opponent who you really ought to suspect might be rather intelligent as an ignorant boob, bordering on a genuine diagnosable moron, to such a degree that when the candidate speaks and reveals himself as reasonably intelligent, he actually seems to be nearly a genius.

Demean those who don't live in "cosmopolitan" cities as bumpkins who have nothing to contribute to politics or culture -- not their own ideas, their own aspirations, their own fears, their own traditions -- except for the votes they're expected to cast for the Democratic elites who scorn them.

And all the rest of it.

Now, after the fact, the left is convulsing and gnashing their teeth. How could we have allowed ourselves to so demean Sarah Palin as to turn her home-run speech into a genuine star-making speech by lowering expectations so much through our derision!?!

How could you have done that, you ask. That's not the right question. The right question is Is it even possible for you to avoid doing that?, because you do every. Single. God. Damn. Election. Cycle.

It works in my favor, and yet I'm still horrified to see you doing it every time.

Have you ever done anything else? Are you capable of doing anything differently? Even as conservatives snicker at you and tell you to your smug fat faces that you're making a gross strategic error, you continue doing so just the same!

We don't even bother to hide our snickering at you any longer. We don't bother to conceal this basic error from you -- we simply declare it. We don't have to hide this, we don't have to try to avoid tipping you off that you're making this mistake for the thirtieth time, because we know you won't listen anyway!

That's the truly delightful thing about this. We don't have to scheme with each other and say, "Quiet down, don't give the game away," when a fellow conservative points the error out. It doesn't matter! We can scream this from the rooftops for all the good it does you.

It's like we're fighting a war and we don't even have to bother coding our messages to the troops because we know there's no chance at all you'll even bother to pause to read our communications. "Don't bother us with your silly orders and tactics and strategies," you tell us, "We can figure out how to beat you silly people well enough on our own without any of your stupid-brained help."

You can? You sure about that? Well, whatever, buddy. If you think so. Seems to me you guys are 3-4 since 1994 -- a losing record -- but if you guys want to keep following the same game plan, be my guest.

Ultimately the liberals' sin is their smugness. Not even so much because most people recoil from the assumption of superiority, both intellectual and moral, by those who have accomplished nothing exceptional in life except for reliably voting and "thinking" liberal, as if casting a vote the "correct" way slaps 30 points on to your IQs and counts for 100 hours of community service and child mentoring.

No, the main problem with that smugness, that belief that you're sooo very fucking clever, is that you're actually not particularly clever at all, and the great gap between your personal estimation of your intelligence and the actual real-world measure of it is wide enough to stumble into and take a painful fall. Perhaps if you weren't so very convinced of your own innate entitlement to rule, you'd spend less time seething at a public unwilling to concede that rule to you, and less time trying to trick the public into voting for you by concealing your true beliefs, and more time trying to figure out what the public actually wants in its government, and how to provide with them with that.

You know the big difference between conservatives and liberals in terms of political acumen? You guys never see this stuff coming, because you're so convinced of your innate right to control other people's lives. You convince ourselves you're always the smartest guys in the room, and anyone who disagrees with you must either be so stupid or so luminescently evil they could never prevail in a campaign.

The Ronald Reagans and Sarah Palins surprise you, because you just can't even conceive of them. Your entire sense of self-worth depends on the proposition Liberal = Smart, Good, Conservatives = Stupid, Bad, so you can't imagine clever, good people opposing you.

You go into every election thinking the score is already 24-0 in your favor -- after all, you have nothing but vicious, racist, gay-bashing hobo-killing morons in your way. How can you, the Moral and Intellectual Elect of the Earth, possibly fail?

And yet you do. More frequently than you win.

Eh. I don't know why I'm bothering to tell you this. As you've demonstrated in every past election, you're not going to listen anyhow.

Ya fuckin' dunces.

Oh, and... Good job so demeaning her you half-convinced the public she was a drooling imbecile and yee-haw hollerin' bumpkin who'd embarrass herself on stage.

Sure, sure. Smart move.

A former beauty queen -- who could have imagined she might be comfortable in front of a large, critical crowd, and might in fact even thrive in the spotlight?

A former television sportscaster -- who would have predicted she'd have some poise and savvy playing to a camera?

Amen. I have run into this in discussions with family and friends when politics come up. I try to avoid talking politics because, like many of you reading this, I keep up with it very closely, I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Most people, left or right, aren't that up on the issues. Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views.


Comments (Page 1)
on Sep 05, 2008

You know, I really don't keep up with political issues as much as other people on here, but I acknowledge that.  There's only so many hours in my day and political news is somewhere around the middle for me. 

Just curious though...you've posted avoiding arguing with friends and family alot...are they mostly liberal then?

A few of my friends are liberal, or what I would call liberal, but they don't seem to have the kind of characteristics described in that article.  Maybe they are just moderates compared to liberals you have talked to.

on Sep 05, 2008

Liberals never claim to have any common sense. Intelligence doesn't have to include wisdom.

on Sep 05, 2008

Momma always said ....

on Sep 06, 2008

He's right...

Often I find myself arguing with a Liberal on a topic to have them point out multiple facts from the past (hindsight is 20/20, right?) with no facts as to why decisions are made.  When I say "Decisions are made based on evidence presented at the time.  Haven't you ever looked back and said 'Well gee, that was dumb... guess I should finish and follow through though since I started.'" and have them stutter while they remember a few times, but not want to admit that the real reference was a Middle Eastern Conflict.

Better, I don't think we'd actually be in this Middle Eastern Conflict (as I refuse to call it a war, regardless of what Congress agreed to... and I served over there before anybody gets up in arms) if we had finished the job in the first place.  The biggest issue is that we pulled out in the 90s, not that we went back in this decade.

That's what Liberals do... they make snap judgements, and implement policy, that then is had to be dealt with when a Conservative takes office.  By that time, the Liberal is out, after coasting on the Conservative Policies, and the Conservative is cleaning up the Liberal Fuckups (excuse my language).
Yes, Clinton did it... ALOT... that's why he got Impeached, and Bush never even had a slap on the wrist.  And I think that's why we're in the situation we're in today, as apposed to after 12 years of Conservatives where the Clinton Administration cruised afterwards.

PS: DemiGod is the shizzle.

on Sep 06, 2008

One of my friends told me yesterday "There's no logic in being a republican" thinking that I wasn't a conservative. I asked him "Why?" and his response was "No intelligent person could believe that the world is only 6000 years old."

It confused me. I mean, I'm not a relgious person at all, but I'm still a conservative. Which is something I explained (in a, gasp, logical manner) to him and then he acted bewildered at the mere concept of an atheistic conservative. The conversation then went towards me just being subconsciously racist and planning to vote for McCain/Palin was just a cop-out for not feeling comfortable voting for Barack Obama.

Apparently, in my friend's head (who said there's no logic in being a conservative), a conservative can't just disagree with some of Obama's positions on health care and his foreign policy but, instead, has to be subsconsciously racist. I also can't stand Biden's views on net neutrality, which is the only point my friend and I agreed on.

on Sep 06, 2008

Amen. So many of these liberals believe that you have to vote for the black guy, because he's black. Why? Why would I vote for the white guy because he's white? There's no difference, and the implication that there would be one is a step backwards. Ergo, I will not vote for Obama, because he's a non-religious religious-poser, ex-Marxist, ex-cocaine addict, and an ex-alcoholic, not to mention his politics. Even if I were racist, I wouldn't vote for him anyways.

on Sep 06, 2008

It's sort of like this Democratic relay race cartoon

-

on Sep 06, 2008

"Amen. I have run into this in discussions with family and friends when politics come up. I try to avoid talking politics because, like many of you reading this, I keep up with it very closely, I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Most people, left or right, aren't that up on the issues. Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views."

 

Seems to me you are really not all that knowledgable on politics. You simply repeat the same spin that the politicians of one party put on another. To truly understand politics is to understand both sides of the issues because they affect people in different ways.  Take a good look then you might notice there are both liberal and conservative elitist, both liberal and conservatives who demean others that have opposing views, intelligent people in both camps and dumb-asses on both sides of the fence.

on Sep 06, 2008

Seems to me you are really not all that knowledgable on politics. You simply repeat the same spin that the politicians of one party put on another

Point proven Brad.

on Sep 06, 2008

Why is it when a lefty states something it a "hard cold fact, yet when a righty says the same thing it's called "spin"?

The perfect example of the Liberal wing of the Democratic party is the behavior of Hillary Clinton in the primaries, She felt "entitled" to the nod for the Candidacy for a shot at POTUS. Her main resume was that she was FLOTUS and knew how things were run. This sense of entitlement is the basic stance of the Liberals, a simple sense of "I know what is best for you" and they {meaning the entire right wing} don't!

on Sep 06, 2008

Ergo, I will not vote for Obama,

You're 15.  You can't vote anyway.

on Sep 06, 2008

I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views.

Me smart. They dumb. Conservative good! Liberals bad!

Boooooooriiiiing.

I've read this argument a thousand times.

To this day, it still amazes me how completely fleeced folks are over the illusion of an election you'll be participating in. Essentially, you have the choice between Coke, or Pepsi. Which, at the end of the day, is no real choice at all.

Or, as a Russian fellow once said, you get to choose between

"the capitalist party, or, the other capitalist party"

on Sep 06, 2008

Essentially, you have the choice between Coke, or Pepsi

Nah - More like Dr. Pepper or Sprite.

on Sep 06, 2008

Dr Guy
Essentially, you have the choice between Coke, or Pepsi
Nah - More like Dr. Pepper or Sprite.

mmm Sprite... wait... Sprite's Republican isn't it?

 

Democrat's aren't less clever (or more stupid) than Republicans. The difference is, more Democrats pretend Republicans are.

on Sep 06, 2008

Dr Guy-

Nah - More like Dr. Pepper or Sprite.

You know, if you mix coke with amaretto it tastes just like Dr. pepper. And has a better side effect too. Sprite would have to be the republican drink, though, because that's all that the real party boss (Cheney) drinks. When he's not shooting his friends in the face..... Sorry, bad joke I know

Meta
Views
» 5540
Comments
» 88
Category
Sponsored Links