Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on September 5, 2008 By Draginol In Republican

I've written about this many times in the past but one of the more off putting features of American liberals is their smugness.  If you disagree with them it is only because you are either ignorant or evil. This tends to result in them losing elections. Often.

I just read a very interesting blog about this that I thought I'd share here:

This conceit of liberals -- which sometimes I think is all that sustains them, and all that keeps them liberals in the first place -- that liberals have some sort of a monopoly on brains, wit, taste, and, yes, even basic humanity will be their undoing. It always is. They keep making the same mistakes over and over and over and over again, and we're the dumb ones.

They, the ones who have made the same ten mistakes every single election since 1968, are the smart ones. Right?

Let's check the list: Demean an opponent who you really ought to suspect might be rather intelligent as an ignorant boob, bordering on a genuine diagnosable moron, to such a degree that when the candidate speaks and reveals himself as reasonably intelligent, he actually seems to be nearly a genius.

Demean those who don't live in "cosmopolitan" cities as bumpkins who have nothing to contribute to politics or culture -- not their own ideas, their own aspirations, their own fears, their own traditions -- except for the votes they're expected to cast for the Democratic elites who scorn them.

And all the rest of it.

Now, after the fact, the left is convulsing and gnashing their teeth. How could we have allowed ourselves to so demean Sarah Palin as to turn her home-run speech into a genuine star-making speech by lowering expectations so much through our derision!?!

How could you have done that, you ask. That's not the right question. The right question is Is it even possible for you to avoid doing that?, because you do every. Single. God. Damn. Election. Cycle.

It works in my favor, and yet I'm still horrified to see you doing it every time.

Have you ever done anything else? Are you capable of doing anything differently? Even as conservatives snicker at you and tell you to your smug fat faces that you're making a gross strategic error, you continue doing so just the same!

We don't even bother to hide our snickering at you any longer. We don't bother to conceal this basic error from you -- we simply declare it. We don't have to hide this, we don't have to try to avoid tipping you off that you're making this mistake for the thirtieth time, because we know you won't listen anyway!

That's the truly delightful thing about this. We don't have to scheme with each other and say, "Quiet down, don't give the game away," when a fellow conservative points the error out. It doesn't matter! We can scream this from the rooftops for all the good it does you.

It's like we're fighting a war and we don't even have to bother coding our messages to the troops because we know there's no chance at all you'll even bother to pause to read our communications. "Don't bother us with your silly orders and tactics and strategies," you tell us, "We can figure out how to beat you silly people well enough on our own without any of your stupid-brained help."

You can? You sure about that? Well, whatever, buddy. If you think so. Seems to me you guys are 3-4 since 1994 -- a losing record -- but if you guys want to keep following the same game plan, be my guest.

Ultimately the liberals' sin is their smugness. Not even so much because most people recoil from the assumption of superiority, both intellectual and moral, by those who have accomplished nothing exceptional in life except for reliably voting and "thinking" liberal, as if casting a vote the "correct" way slaps 30 points on to your IQs and counts for 100 hours of community service and child mentoring.

No, the main problem with that smugness, that belief that you're sooo very fucking clever, is that you're actually not particularly clever at all, and the great gap between your personal estimation of your intelligence and the actual real-world measure of it is wide enough to stumble into and take a painful fall. Perhaps if you weren't so very convinced of your own innate entitlement to rule, you'd spend less time seething at a public unwilling to concede that rule to you, and less time trying to trick the public into voting for you by concealing your true beliefs, and more time trying to figure out what the public actually wants in its government, and how to provide with them with that.

You know the big difference between conservatives and liberals in terms of political acumen? You guys never see this stuff coming, because you're so convinced of your innate right to control other people's lives. You convince ourselves you're always the smartest guys in the room, and anyone who disagrees with you must either be so stupid or so luminescently evil they could never prevail in a campaign.

The Ronald Reagans and Sarah Palins surprise you, because you just can't even conceive of them. Your entire sense of self-worth depends on the proposition Liberal = Smart, Good, Conservatives = Stupid, Bad, so you can't imagine clever, good people opposing you.

You go into every election thinking the score is already 24-0 in your favor -- after all, you have nothing but vicious, racist, gay-bashing hobo-killing morons in your way. How can you, the Moral and Intellectual Elect of the Earth, possibly fail?

And yet you do. More frequently than you win.

Eh. I don't know why I'm bothering to tell you this. As you've demonstrated in every past election, you're not going to listen anyhow.

Ya fuckin' dunces.

Oh, and... Good job so demeaning her you half-convinced the public she was a drooling imbecile and yee-haw hollerin' bumpkin who'd embarrass herself on stage.

Sure, sure. Smart move.

A former beauty queen -- who could have imagined she might be comfortable in front of a large, critical crowd, and might in fact even thrive in the spotlight?

A former television sportscaster -- who would have predicted she'd have some poise and savvy playing to a camera?

Amen. I have run into this in discussions with family and friends when politics come up. I try to avoid talking politics because, like many of you reading this, I keep up with it very closely, I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Most people, left or right, aren't that up on the issues. Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views.


Comments (Page 3)
6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Sep 08, 2008

Here's probably a good summation:

If you think someone else is dumb or inferior to you simply because they hold a different political philosophy from you, then you should probably re-evaluate.

on Sep 08, 2008

Yes, and dubbya knowingly lied in order to start a war that killed thousands and shredded your constitution to the point that he's basically a "unitary executive", what with warrantless domestic surveillance and now torture being back in vogue.

Again, stating an erroneous opinion as fact.  And validating Brad's point.  The TRUTH is you dont know it was a lie, and the evidence to date indicates they were not.  Faulty intelligence is not a lie.  And unitary executive?  Because the left has not gotten 100% of their wishes? 

Warrantless domestic searches - you mean the ones Bill Clinton did?

You are funny.

on Sep 08, 2008

It's interesting how so many missed the point of the article, proved the point of the article and became some defensive, all at the same time. Sure this article can describe people from both parties, no one is denying or disputing that. What those who got offended failed to understand is that, while both parties share in this "insult the other party" game, Republicans are not known for doing that as part of the Party Modo, yet Democrats make it their most powerful weapon. Just as an example, how many insults and dispicable stories came about about Biden when Obama nominated him for VP? Compare that to Palin when McCain nominated her. How about when Obama flip flops? He was very strong opiniated about the surge not work, now all of a sudden he agrees it did. Where is the uproar from the Democrats who agreed with him and backed him when he said the surge did not work? How come you guys are not screaming about his betrayal? Not to mention how he switched from no drilling to "maybe we should". But you guys don't point that out about your candidate.

Yet time and again people like Brad, ParaTed and others have not held back at pointing out how disappointed they are that McCain is the Republican nominee. They are willing to admit they don't like the guy and would rather vote for Obama, 3rd party nominee or not vote at all. Every time one of our own screws up we throw him under the bus just as esily as we throw a Democrat under one. Many times has Bush been put down right on these forums by Republicans and Conservatives for things such as stemcell and immigration. But when ever a representative of the Democrat party does something stupid, like the guy who said "Maybe god really is on our side" when Gustav was on it's way to New Orleans or Obama's "former" pastor when he said "God Damn America", you guys quickly scream "they don't speak for all Democrats".

on Sep 08, 2008

Feel free to take a stroll down the DU:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3944814

These are people who hate other people over political ideology.

on Sep 08, 2008

Ya fuckin' dunces.
Ah, so smugly said, ala Rove who thinks he's the smartest on the planet.

As for my humble yet elite opinion: Methinks the dragon with fire protests too much.

on Sep 08, 2008

Artysim said "lied about the war in order to start a war that killed thousands of and shredded your constitution to the point that he's a "unitary executive", what with the warrantless domestic surveillance and now torture being back in vogue."

Artysim some questions for you "Have you been to Iraq?" I'm going to say negative on that one and that you get most of your information from the our media.  One of Draginol's point was that: "have you heard anything about Biden's son?" NO because the media isn't going to talk about that.  NEWS FLASH: OUR MEDIA IS BIASED!  Surprise!!!  What's my point.  First, Iraq borders with a country called Iran to the northish.  The only thing that divides this border is a desert.  There is NO FENCE NO WATER JUST SAND!!!!  Let me just say that there have been items found at near THAT VERY border that the MEDIA HAS NOT BEEN ALLOWED TO REPORT ABOUT OR TO KNOW ABOUT.  To keep people from going in to major panic mode. Keep believing everything our media feeds you because we all know that they're not allowed to lie on TV.  BTW, Most Iraqis do appreciate us being there and also the war even with the lack of troops (again the Iranian border HAS NOTHING prevent the flow of anything so there was a HUGE INFUX from there) the media makes it seem like we were on verge of losing the war, which isn't true.  There were things that WE need to do differently again the border between those two countries being WIDE OPEN!

Second thing, is that 'dubbya' is not AN 'unitary executive', for the torture thing that you said that is in vogue now down in that prison in Cuba most of the prisoners were released and guess what 'dubbya' didn't want that to happen.  Did he get his way? NO, man what AN 'unitary executive'.  Just SO YOU know, at least 20 of those prisoners released went right back into fighting or are in command positions in Islamic forces.  I'm not saying that tortue is right, but fyi most of the world does torture. I gurantee and know for a fact that Iran and so does China tortue people, but you don't see people telling those two countries they shouldn't do that. 

Same goes with China and India with this whole 'global warming' thing.  Everyone is pointing a finger at us, but NO ONE is pointing a finger at these two countries.  Its as if we should know better and WE signed that Koyote treaty.  Again fyi, if we would continued to produce nuclear power plants at the right we were doing before three mile island. Guess what? We would have been able to compile 100% with that treaty by late 90s early 2000.  What China and India does actually affects our climate.

I am glad that you believe what the media states, especially dealing with the battle in Iraq.  Remember, there are somethings that this country doesn't want it citizens to know pertaining to the Iraq war. 

Artysim, we are not forcing them to convert to Chirstianity (I will say this ' those radicals Muslims will force you to if they had a chance' and trust me they WILL FORCE YOU).  I know people who went there and most of the youth there is sick of Islam.  Christianity does not believe in forced conversions. It is a choice, yes, you can bring up mistakes from the past.

Finally, Artysim, you said GB the 2nd "however seems to think that the world is a game of risk and has given up that alliance in order to get meeagre territorial gains and place troops and weapons on the border with Russia, which is not a smart move"  News flash: This whole year Russian hasn't really acted like a democracy.  I wonder where North Korea and Iran got their weapons?  I wonder where all those Nuclear Reactors have come from?  You say that's not a smart move, I wonder how we brought down the mighty Soviet Union hmmmm.  Russian also has  several different alliances with Iran. 

In your humble opinion, how should we handle Russia.  Don't forget Putin is just in the 'background' and  he's not PULLING ANY STRINGS anymore.

 

 

on Sep 08, 2008

Dr Guy,

Again, stating an erroneous opinion as fact.

tsk tsk. Where did I say this was 100 % ironclad fact? I believe it to be true, but I am not debasing or ridiculing anyone else for not believing it. My opinion is that he knowingly lied, whereas Brad's opinion (I'm assuming, please correct me if I'm mistaken) is that he had faulty intelligence that he ran with. Which, if you made an intel mistake of that magnitude you would think that heads at the CIA would have rolled, but instead he gave Tenet a medal.... hhhmm.... anywho, I also agree with Brad's earlier statement that this is a long drawn out situation best left for another time. If you do want to press this point, however, I'd be more than happy to oblige!

Draginol-

Here's probably a good summation: If you think someone else is dumb or inferior to you simply because they hold a different political philosophy from you, then you should probably re-evaluate.

And I agree with this 100%. Well said! I've gotten into many debates in which my only aim is  discussion, but as soon as I state an opinion on a topic the other side (quite often conservative, though not always) comes back with a personal attack "typical LIEberal, all you do is lie and hate freedom!!" kinda thing. It doesn't matter to me, but it is disapointing to see the walls go up and possibility for open-minded debate die the moment I say something the other side doesn't agree with.

 

on Sep 08, 2008

but as soon as I state an opinion on a topic the other side (quite often conservative, though not always) comes back with a personal attack "typical LIEberal, all you do is lie and hate freedom!!" kinda thing.

That's odd because I often see you argue with people but I rarely see that.

on Sep 08, 2008

And the same thing on "torture". Very tireseome. Once upon a time, torture meant, well, torture. Now, we live in a world where being forced to stay awake a long time or water bordering is considered torture.

Actually, torture was definied by the AG at the time as anything causing pain equivalent to organ failure or death. Which meant everything else was fair game. This included locking people inside a metal box small enough that they were forced into the fetal position (no room to do anything else, turn over etc) for indefinite periods of time. At random intervals, say after 15 hours, they would be pulled out of the box, allowed to stand up for another random interval (might be a few minutes, might be an hour) then thrown back in the box for another random amount of time, lather rinse repeat. This is just one technique that when mixed with a bunch of others (enforced stress positions while undergoing sensory deprivation, isolation with constant blasting music and strobelights and of course everyone's favorite, waterboarding) actually succeeded in turning lots of folks into basket cases and scarring them for life. Many of these folks never even had a trial, but were simply handed over to the U.S by militias abroad who said "this guy's a terrorist".

And then of course there's rendition. Sending someone to another country where you KNOW they will be unequivocally tortured the old fashioned way (electricity, pliars meet fingernails, random beatings) as happened to one of my countrymen when he was simply passing through the States on a connecting flight. Turned out he was completely innocent, oh well, tough luck for him that he spent a year in jail in Syria!

on Sep 08, 2008

That's odd because I often see you argue with people but I rarely see that.

This coming from someone who's told me to F -off (well actually you said "F- u") several times on one thread. Just for expressing my opinion in the name of debate.

on Sep 08, 2008

Veiridia stated "and then we have Clinton, who actually balanced the ****** budget.  Who, mind you, actually used those fiscal conservative ideology that republicans preach so much."  Veiridia, did Clinton single handally do this?  Who controlled congress? Does a man by the first name Newt, ring a bell? Which party was he a part of?  Yeah, exactly!!!!!  If my memory serves me correctly it was HIS party that DEMAND that the budget will be balanced!  The President alone CAN NOT balance the budget.

Then you stated that some how Sarah Palin is a bad parent because her daughter is pregnant. Her daughter is a human, right?  Her daughter has a mind, right? YES AND YES!!  Her daughter can do things that maybe her mom disapproves.  I think most people posting here can say that they rebellied against their parents at one time or another.  Does that mean that their parents are bad? 

I love it when that one group of people say 'how can she be VP and take care of 5 children' again this group is the group that claims to be the party of the Minority and those who have been short changed by society. 


Veiridia, then you make a statement "I don't think anyone can argue against this, George W. Bush is the stupidest president ever elected.  I mean, just read any of the Bushims books, he said the most amazingly retarded things that make 5th graders look good."  You are committing a logical fallacy.  Trying to link someone's public speaking skills to their intelligence.  Just because someone isn't a great orator does not make them an idiot.  Bill Clinton probably was in the top 5 best orators that this country has ever had as a president.  He could literally speak his way out of anything, now does that make Bill a genius just because he has excellent public speaking skills?  Hitler was an excellent public speaker and was able to use the system to his advantage as well just because he was very chariasmatic does not mean he's intelligent.  Do you know who Theodore John Kaczynski is?  This guy is a genius (literally he has a genius IQ.  I wasn't being sacrastic there), you should look him up and see what he did and what he was doing before he became into the public's eye.    Find a video of him speaking and you'll see that he's not the best public speaker.

I would like to see you give several messages (yeah it is on the teleprompter and those words do move) to basically the whole world and let's see how you do.  I am not agruing here the GW Bush is a rocket sciencist or is a genius for that matter.  I am agruing the correlation that Veiridia is trying to say between public speaking skills and intelligence and how they go hand in hand. 

on Sep 08, 2008

Feel free to take a stroll down the DU:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3944814

These are people who hate other people over political ideology.

Why bother linking to another site. There is plenty of that here in JU. To be fair there is plenty of it showing in just about every blog site that addresses political issues.

 

on Sep 08, 2008

the people's party-

Interesting points you make. Unfortunately, you've made statements that tie together a large number of non-related topics, any one of which we can (and have done so in the past ad infinitum) debate further.

Iraq is a complext topic and many different facets of that situation can be debated. My point there was going back to 2003 when Bush made his speech to the UN (and Colin Powell did his song and dance to the security council) in which we were all told Iraq had a sophisticated, extensive WMD program and was going to drop nukes and advanced chemical and biological agents on us with remote controlled drone aircraft capable of reaching intercontinental distances. That's what sold the war. Not humanitarian intervention (otherwise you'd have invaded Sudan and Rwanda years ago) Not dealing with Iran's ambitions. We were told that a maniacal dictator was planning to wipe us all out and had the means to do it. This turned out to be false. I happen to believe that the president knew this to be the case but wanted the intel fixed to support his bid for war. Other's here believe that he didn't know, which would be a pretty big screw up on the part of all the intel groups. So why then did he reward the head of the CIA (George Tenet) instead of calling him onto the proverbial carpet?

Furthermore, I see you don't have a blog attached to your handle. If you'd be so kind as to post some articles I'm very interested to see you expound your views further!

on Sep 08, 2008

These are people who hate other people over political ideology.

No wonder they want to use our money!  They are morons when it comes to making their own!  Damn!  And this idiot is proud of his stupidity.

Where did I say this was 100 % ironclad fact? I believe it to be true

Yes, but you stated it in the declaritive (as in a fact) without a supporting hint of subjective instead of objective admission.

Which, if you made an intel mistake of that magnitude you would think that heads at the CIA would have rolled,

Yes, let's throw the baby out with the bathwater.  I can see why Tort lawyers are so liberal.  They beleive, apparently like all liberals, in the inerrancy of man.

Glad I dont work for a liberal.  I am just a poor schmuck that occassional makes mistakes.  I dont want to be executed for them.

on Sep 08, 2008

And then of course there's rendition. Sending someone to another country where you KNOW they will be unequivocally tortured the old fashioned way (electricity, pliars meet fingernails, random beatings) as happened to one of my countrymen when he was simply passing through the States on a connecting flight. Turned out he was completely innocent, oh well, tough luck for him that he spent a year in jail in Syria!

Blame Clinton - he set up the system.

6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last