Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on January 4, 2012 By Draginol In Politics


In “real life” I’m not particularly political. I don’t donate to candidates or political causes, I don’t put signs on my lawn. I’m interested in the discussion of politics in the same way that other people are interested in the discussion of sports.

If you’re come here from a link claiming I’m some sort of political lunatic, a few things to bear in mind:

When started in 2001, I posted intentionally provocative articles. The idea was to get a discussion going.

As time went on and I became better known, this started to become a problem as people not familiar with started to link to cherry picked posts and use them as forum fodder for my work as a software developer or business owner.

The analogy I would use is imagine if one of the writers from later became really well known years later and people, not realizing the nature of started using his articles as representative of what that person’s overall views are.

Now, I’m using an extreme example and for the record, I consider myself politically conservative. But hopefully most people reading this are intelligent enough to make the distinction between an article written on a discussion forum for the sake of getting a discussion forum versus a personal blog ( is a community blog site, it’s not my online diary).

Over the years, I’ve had to make private some of the earlier year posts because I got tired of having to explain how much of what I have written is tongue-in-cheek.  Such as…

  • No, I don’t support converting homeless people into food for the hungry even if I suggested it in a post back in 2002.
  • No, I don’t actually harvest a kidney from each of my children so I can drink poisons safely.
  • No, Social Services has never actually visited my house.
  • No, I don’t think Obama is Hitler.
  • No, I don’t think Bush is Hitler.
  • No, I don’t think Hitler is Hitler.
  • No, I don’t think liberalism is a disease.
  • Etc.

The reality is, there are people out there that are always looking for an excuse to be offended or outraged.  If you post enough things over enough time, you can always cherry pick something that you can use to pain very broad strokes about them.

on Jan 04, 2012

So true. God forbid people would actually try to get to know people before thinking they are A, B or C just because of one line they read on some random site.

on Jan 05, 2012

So then its not true that you sacrificed your first born into the fiery mouth of Baal to bring rain and fertile crops?

on Jan 05, 2012

Hitler is not Hitler?  I've been lied to!!!!


A shame you cannot openly express your views.  I understand with the company.  I would hate to be in that position, but will soon myself that way.

on Jan 06, 2012

I don't think homeless people would taste very good, anyway; no meat on them.


on Jan 07, 2012

 Hitler is not Hitler because his name is Mephistopheles.

on Jan 07, 2012

"No, I don’t think liberalism is a disease." Just the infectious stevendedalus.

on Jan 07, 2012

sd -

We were just talking about you in another thread (not by name, of course).  Good to see you back again.

on Jan 07, 2012


Thanks, though we're 90% at odds, we do respect each other and at times engage in stimulating interaction.

on Jan 07, 2012

I enjoy your sense of humor and willingness to joust, always the gentleman.

Not so sure about the 'simulating interaction' part - perhaps 'stimulating discourse' would be a better phrase.

on Jan 08, 2012

Fine, wholesome word, DISCOURSE.

on Jan 16, 2012

 Hitler is not Hitler because his name is Mephistopheles.

Hitler is easier to spell.