Except for the fact that both have websites. My assumption is that you are ignorant to the actual circumstances of Hostess' situation, and it is obvious that I hit the nail on the head as far as that goes.

Guess Judge Drain is ignorant, too:

No the judge was right. I wouldn't have expected the BCTGM to make certain suggestions that they made either, but they are tasked with representing  the interests of their own members and not others unless they have agreements to do such with the other unions involved.

No comment on the entertainer category, but I've seen plenty of complaining that sports figures are grossly overpaid for what they bring to a team.

They bring paying fans and TV viewers, without which the team has nothing.  Michael Jordan brings something that Shannon Brown does not.  I don't begrudge the market rewarding people like Jordan, and I don't begrudge the market rewarding people like Sandy Weil.  Many seem to think a Jordan 'earns it' while a Weil doesn't, but I think that's because more people see a Jordan's impact than 'see' a Weil's.  Same with highly paid actors & musicians.  I disagree about most things with most actors but that doesn't keep me from enjoying their work.

The only thing that does torque me a bit is that too many athletes/actors/musicians believe their success somehow validates their particular political views, when it has nothing to do with them, and earns them a special place (and standing) on the soap box.

I don't think it is success that drives their political views. Their careers simply give them the soapbox on which to express their views, but I think just like everyone else it is their own particular experiences in life which underly and form their political views.