Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Loving what you do but being hated for doing it..
Published on March 23, 2005 By Draginol In Business

Recently there's been an interesting discussion on WinCustomize.com about Stardock and PR. Simply put, Stardock's software is outstanding, but my outpsoken nature creates a lot of detractors for the company.

If you think I'm in your face in politics or whatever here on JoeUser.com, you should see me in the "customization community".  I'm very opinionated and vigorously defend our software.

Long ago, when Stardock was just a few people, the "customization community" consisted of just a couple of tiny websites. That is where I hung out.  I was part of that community.  It was a tiny group.

But as changing the way Windows looks and feels has grown into a market of millions of people, my "omnipresence" has irked some people.  Someone on some site trashes one of our programs, I'll challenge them.  To me, it's natural, I've always done that.  But now that it's a big market, new people find this off putting that the "CEO" of a company is out there in the trenches slogging it out with some troll.

And that's putting me at a cross-roads.  On one such site, I'm the oldest active user on the site. New users don't realize that once upon a time, these websites were just a few guys hanging around debating various things.  Now these same sites seem huge and entrenched and so my presence seems heavy handed.  So do I continue to hang out on such sites, defending our products, slogging it out with the trolls, or do I hang out purely on our sites and let the "PR" people gently defend our stuff and participate?

Not that I'll give up my opinionated, off-putting, arrogant, obnoxious blogs on non-business related things here on JoeUser. I consider that part of my compensation package.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 28, 2005
I think that inasmuch as it is bad for the company with no significant positive side then perhaps it would be best to make changes. For example, your posts on free software which so deftly linked fact and opinion were placed onto the TotalGaming website in the "Featured Articles" section. I feel that this was foolish, because most of the people who will be going there are teenagers or young "geeky" adults . . . the same sort of people who tend to be proponents of free software. I think that it is a bad idea to present your personal opinions on this matter in a way that they seem to be coming from or approved by Stardock (they are, after all, "featured"), when these opinions are in contrast with that of the target demographic of a site.

And yes, I know there is a linux one there too now . . . but my point is that there should not be any controversial stuff on the fornt page of a site where you are trying to sell someone a game, one way or another. At the best people will think "hmm, blogs", and at the worst it will lead to trolling and turn people off buying stuff, plus it means more database traffic, so why have it at all?

In summary - it is all very well to have a great backend that allows you to put articles on any of the Stardock websites, but if it means you put articles on certain websites which cause prospective customers to dislike the company, then it becomes a bad feature.
on Mar 28, 2005
Only game articles should get featured onto TG.net.  That is a bug, not a designed feature.
2 Pages1 2