Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Government is not the answer
Published on February 21, 2004 By Draginol In Current Events

We have a huge debt.  The debt is caused because the federal government spends more than it gets in. You either have to increase income or reduce expenses. The deficit is large enough and the debt so vast that raising taxes would not likely do the trick and besides, it rewards poor financial management.


What pro-mommy government people don't realize, typically because they've never dealt with the government itself, is that the government is incredibly inefficient and incompetent.  It's not like your tax dollar goes to some poor person directly. Instead, it goes through a huge beaueucracy which eats up most of it and then a small amount makes it back.  Nothing is more efficient than individuals spending their own money and living within their means.


The debt is not caused by welfare to poor people. It's not caused by defense. It's caused by an over expenditure in both social programs and non-social programs. 


The reason this issue won't get solved is that people who care enough to even talk about this issue have no apparent idea of what the government spends its money on in the first place.  You have some people talking about education as if it's mainly funded by the federal government when in fact arguably the federal government shouldn't be spending anything on public schools (it's a state issue). You have others insisting that the problem is too much defense spending despite the fact that the deficit exceeds the entire defense budget.  The biggest problem is that the federal government is spending money on things that really have nothing to do with the job of the federal government.


Just because one believes in welfare doesn't mean that the federal government is the one to provide it.  The federal government is the least equipped to provide these programs because of its inherent inefficiecy. It would be much better for states or local communities to handle it if you don't trust charities (for some reason, liberals don't like charities and instead want the government to do instead despite the obvious ineptitude of governments).


People who love the government to do things are almost always people who have never had to deal with one of their agencies.  Ever deal with the phone company? Or some other big private industyr monopoly? They're usually incredibly incompotent. But that's nothing compared to the government.


If we want to eliminate the deficit and reduce the debt, we have to take a cold hard look at where the federal government spends its money. Then we have to make some tough decisions. 


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 21, 2004
Thank you for that article Brad. Some of the points you made got me, I really don't know much about where my tax dollar goes, and I wasn't sure about who funded the educational systems. On the other hand, I don't talk about national debt (since I really am clued out most the time), personal debt has been more of a focus for me, since a good amount of people seem to be clued out about money management.*
I'm not sure if you happen to know anything about Hawaii's situation. Unique in a few ways: One, we have the only state run school system in the nation (with a statewide board of education, etc.), which I think is why I thought that all other states must be ran and funded by the federal government--so I've been proved ignorant there. The second unique thing about Hawaii, is that we have a state General Excise Tax. I think all other states have pretty gotten rid of theirs because of their efforts to create a national standard. Companies and Vendors have a heck of a time trying to learn and understand this GET, and for good reason, I don't want to try to explain it now--Im sure nobody wants to know. If anybody does want to know about it, I'll do what so often the Hawaii tax office says to me over the phone,
"Hmm, I'm not the one who can answer that question for you, why don't you go to our website first...Oh, you went there, okay, well then send us an email...Oh you did that and didn't get an answer? Okay well, why don't you come down to our main office and talk to somebody then." That's why I just don't pay taxes! ...
I'm kidding, just kidding!

*I'd be interested to see an article on personal debt from you. I'd do one myself, but in my eyes I'm not quite qualified yet to talk on the subject.
on Feb 21, 2004
Clinton - Surplus
Bush - Deficit
on Feb 21, 2004
Reply By: BulbousHeadClinton - SurplusBush - Deficit

It's really not that simple, though. You really have to look and see what happened when the previous president was in office. Not all that happens during a term (good or bad) is the doing of the president that is currently in office. A lot of legislation takes longer than 4 years to be passed and come into effect.
on Feb 21, 2004
If it was as easy as all that, I'm sure our country would run very smoothly. And if politicians were moral... but that needs more substantiation.

In a business, you are praised for working as efficiently as possible with as little personal as possible. Government, however, demands that each department create as much need for money as possible, whether it's necessary or not. Government is bloated by nature.

~Dan
on Feb 21, 2004
What happened while this President was in office was a tax break that the nation couldn't afford.
on Feb 21, 2004
Word Karmagirl.

BulbousHead... I personally can forgive a man for his mistakes when he ADMITS them. But a man of no character, in a place of leadership, reguardless of what deeds he may have done, is out of place.
on Feb 21, 2004
Excuse me Brad; I trust charities,I thrust the Red Cross will get Sadam a clean change of socks and suck all the publicity out of him they can.Which only shows the poor boob gets used once again by an International gang.-------As far as THE DEBT AND TAXES punch up TAXPAYERS UNION on your browser and and I'll meet you there [remember there are strenths in numbers]--have a good day, charlie poore
on Feb 21, 2004
One man: Huh?
on Feb 22, 2004
The problem is, and I hate to side with some 'fringe' elements, but we can't know what the revenue of this nation is. If we look hard enough we might find out how much is raised in federal taxes, but we have no clue about the whole 'pool', how it all is invested and the benefits gained. They can say they have a budget of X dollars, and if they spend X+5 they can say we are 5 in the hole. I have heard that at any given time like 65% of the wealth of this nation only circulates within the government.

The government is too complex, too diversified, and too corrupt to expect to be able to publicly balance the books in a way that anyone could comprehend, and it is in the federal interest to scream 'national debt', especially those who like to raise taxes. If a single accountant can bilk a single investor out of millions, then God only knows what the federal machine can do to cover themselves.

I really wonder if there even is a 'debt' half the time. I tend to think they just don't want to cut into the profits.
on Feb 23, 2004
Good point BakerStreet, but if you are wondering about if there really is a 'debt' or not as you said, you step into a much more interesting issue about the Federal Reserve, but they really don't have much to do with our government.

Buuuut, that's probably for another blog.
on Feb 24, 2004
You make some good points and I don't necessarily disagree. But to try explaining the deficit by means of domestic spending really misses the larger point. Namely that cash is our largest export, this si what the deficit represents. It's purpose is in maintaing the dollar on global market and thereby maintaining international financial power, the WMD of modern times. Foreign nations hold our debt, to suggest it is caused by a drop in the bucket social spending really misses the heart of the matter I afraid.
on Feb 24, 2004
"misses the larger point. Namely that cash is our largest export, this is what the deficit represents."

I think you are talking about the trade deficit. That isn't what Brad is talking about.

"Foreign nations hold our debt"

Actually about 22% of the debt is international. A great deal of all our spending is social, but it is easy to paint it otherwise. Look at how much military spending goes to the VA, tuition, and pensions.
on Feb 24, 2004
no, I'm not talking about trade deficit, i'm talking about nat'l debt
2 Pages1 2