If you spend enough time in a net community you will run into all kinds of
people. If you run a net community you have to make some tough decisions very
quickly about what to do with some of these kinds of people. Some people, let's
face it, are just bad apples. If you met them in person they might be perfectly
reasonable, even normal people. But on-line something happens to them. They
become aggressive, totally devoid of empathy, manipulative, emotionally needy to
the point of demanding attention at all times.
What do you do with these anti-social people? Or actually, more to the point,
these disruptive people? When I started WinCustomize, my instinct was firmly to
go by the "freedom of speech" principle. But as the site became more
popular, the number of disruptive people increased. And these people would drive
away the kinds of people that a net community really needs.
Eventually I was able to find out specifically what type of person really
goes nuts when on-line: Narcisist. Here are the primary symptoms:
Narcisim
- Requires excessive admiration,
adulation, attention and affirmation - or,
failing that, wishes to be feared and to be
notorious (Narcissistic Supply);
- Feels entitled. Demands
automatic and full compliance
with his or her unreasonable expectations
for special and favourable priority
treatment;
- Is "interpersonally exploitative", i.e.,
uses others to achieve his or
her own ends;
- Devoid of empathy. Is
unable or unwilling to identify
with, acknowledge, or accept
the feelings, needs,
preferences, priorities, and choices
of others;
- Constantly envious of others and
seeks to hurt or destroy the objects of his
or her frustration. Suffers
from persecutory (paranoid) delusions as he
or she believes that they feel the
same about him or her and are likely
to act similarly;
|
|
|
|
These kinds of people probably function fine in normal society because they
do not have the ability (or means at least) to constantly be seen by hundreds,
even thousands of people at once. But on-line, they become monsters. And
as bastardly as it may sound, over the years I've become increasingly intolerant
of them. They tend to have the same patterns of behavior. But I still kept
myself from removing these people in all but the most extreme cases.
But then something on another site happened. Over time, our site had become
the most popular skin site in the world. Such popularity tends to breed
resentment with some people and someone commented, wrongly, that we "Exile"
people for simply disagreeing with us. I argued passionately about how we
do not do that. We only exile those who make personal attacks (after sufficient
warning) or promote warez. But it became clear that there was a consensus that
we remove people simply because they tick us off.
Which was a really freeing moment. Because we had wanted to remove
disruptive people for a very long time but didn't because we were trying to be
nice guys and we didn't want people elsewhere to see us as some sort of
totalitarian regime. But heck, if we were already getting falsely accused of it,
then why were we worrying about how people already hostile to us thought.
That was about 3 months ago and since then we have been able to clean up our
net community with great effectiveness. Now, if someone is a jerk or just
plain pisses us off, they're gone. We exercise restraint still but essentially
we just don't want to have jerks hanging out on our forums on WinCustomize.
And we mean jerks in the sense that these would be people that most people would
find to be jerks. If they go on and start flaming people or hijacking
topics or being obnoxious, we'll look at what they've contributed to the
community versus what they are currently doing. If they have contributed to the
community we'll drop them an email asking them to watch their language or
behavior. But if they've never done anything for the net community, zap. Just a
click and they're history. If it's a borderline case at all, we'll discuss
it privately in our admin forum first before deciding.
Not that it happens often. Maybe once a month or so. But what a difference it
makes. Instead of having tempers running high because some jerk is trying to
make life unpleasant for others, that jerk is now gone. Of course, those people
can still go off to other sites and flame us. But at least it's not happening on
our site.
The worst narcissists on-line tend to be women. I have no idea why that is
except that males tend to enable them. I've seen textbook narcissists behaving
in ways that if it were a male they would, at the very least, be criticized. But
if it's a female, they'll get sympathy for behavior that no one would ever
tolerate outside the Internet. Anyone who has spent even a few months on-line
has almost certainly seen this. But whether male or female they are
equally disruptive to a community because both try to turn every forum, every
topic, into being about them. Those who don't fall into line become targets.
I had an incident this past week where a narcissist type user who had long
since been banned from our site for her behavior took her grievance to another
site and began "Standard persecution post #226" about some other user. But
subsequently she apparently could not control her anger and began lashing out at
her usual target list of frustrations (such as me even though I wasn't even
remotely involved on the issue she was upset about). Such posts never
resolve anything (particularly when on other sites that aren't even tangentially
involved). All they do is create strive and ill feelings within a community.
That is why any administrator running a large net community will learn, as we
eventually did, that you have to identify narcissists and remove them. Net
communities (especially blogs) attract narcissists. Most bloggers, myself
included, will exhibit some narcissistic traits. Identifying it in yourself or
in others is crucial to being successful, long term, in a net community. But
most of all, removing those who are unable to control their narcissism will go a
long way to creating a healthier, happier net community.