Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
How beheadings are endangering Arabic lives
Published on June 22, 2004 By Draginol In Current Events

The reaction I'm seeing in my apolitical friends and neighbors to the spate of beheadings in the middle east is a mixture of disgust, anger, and perplexion (if there's such a word).  "How can a human being do this to another human being?"  If these Islamic terrorists believe their actions will somehow change US policy in the region in a way that benefits their cause then they're fools.

The practical result of these beheadings, I believe, is the gradual dehumanization of middle east culture.  The average person viewing these atrocities doesn't hang out on political forums going through the various nuanced arguments of various actions in the middle east. No, the average person simply sees these barbaric acts as inhumane and the product of a sick possibly subhuman culture.

It isn't Americans in the middle east I fear for. It's the Islamic Arab natives of the region I increasingly fear for.

In World War II there were essentially two wars.  The was the war in Europe and the war in the Pacific.  They were fought very differently.  In Europe, the Germans were considered human. Misguided. Maybe even evil. But still human.  The Japanese, by contrast, were considered subhuman, vermin, monkeys, filth to be exterminated. These beliefs led to the use of very different tactics.  In the Pacific war, few Japanese surrendered. But what isn't talked about as much is that one of the reasons few Japanese surrendered was because the marines had little interest in taking "Jap" prisoners. If tank battles come to mind in the war in Europe, marines with flame throwers come to mind in the war against Japan.  By the end of the war, US planes were simply working towards a policy of outright extermination of the Japanese people. Such is the power when one believes their opponents lack humanity.

Democracies are like that though. Democracies perform the policies demanded by the electorate. Americans, by and large, considered the Japanese to be subhuman and the US military obliged this in its policies. 

The worse thing that could happen in the middle east would be for the Arab world to convince Americans that they're not truly human. That they believe life to be so cheap that the US becomes more free to use less humane tactics to pursue its objectives.  Suicide murderers don't do their causes any favors by demonstrating to their opponents that the Arab culture is perfectly willing to treat its youth as little more than weapon ordinance. But these latest acts in Iraq and Saudi Arabia are far worse because they demonstrate a level of grotesque brutality that is alien to most Americans. Sprinkle a few scenes of civilian support for these atrocities and you help convince millions of Americans that these people aren't really sentient beings. Do these creatures of a conscience at all? Are they so devoid of empathy that they can butcher humans as if they were animals?

Far from changing American policy towards the middle east, these actions are likely to result in the American public demanding harsher action in the war on terror. After all, if they're not even human, any action can be justified.  For the sake of the Arab world, I hope that the civilian population is able to clearly signal their disgust at these actions and work publicly and effectively towards the elimination of the perpetrators of these heinous acts.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 22, 2004
This is what I was trying to say, if in a bit more personal terms, in my "A Terrorist's Reckless Assumption." blog. These beheadings are just making us less apt to take our leaders to task about civilian causalities and prisoner mistreatment. At this point my opinion is that any Iraqi or Afghani city US soldiers can't walk safely in should be flattened. Give me a few more beheadings and I will take that attitude for the whole region.

I don't think they are getting what they want. It will be much easier to catch and kill them when the majority of the West ceases to be picky about how it is undertaken. The only thing they are heading for is making a martyr out of the Arab world as a whole.
on Jun 22, 2004

Speaking as the average person who hasn't really paid too much attention to the political aspect of the war until the past few months, I can say this:  my attitude has changed.  At first I was all for the US troops leaving Iraq....they didn't want us there, so we ought to just leave, I thought.  Not any more.  I was angry before Nick Berg was beheaded.... but now I'm vengefully furious.  I want to see the whole culture gone, wiped out, and with every person that's abducted and beheaded my anger grows.  I don't know if the terrorists think that their actions are going to frighten us, or intimidate us...but if they do think that then they're very mistaken.  Their plan will backfire on them, and I hope it does so in a spectacular way.


I don't see the Abu Ghraib scandal in quite the same light anymore either.

on Jun 22, 2004
The worse thing that could happen in the middle east would be for the Arab world to convince Americans that they're not truly human.


Indeed. You have written a execellent article that shows that that is indeed a really bad idea to do. Grabbing other people off the road and beheading and/or dragging or whatever will degrade the world's view on those people. Humanity of people is very important thing to have.
on Jun 22, 2004

Grabbing other people off the road and beheading and/or dragging or whatever will degrade the world's view on those people.


It already has.  The damage has been done.

on Jun 22, 2004

Shit... this is some of your best work to date...

 

Beheading Asians repeatedly is a *bad* idea... it is only a matter of time before they start to recall the sound of drums....

on Jun 23, 2004
There's a lot of truth in what you say, but I still think it's up to us not to be swayed by these actions, and the propaganda that will arise out of them, and remember that we can choose NOT to percieve people as animals, worthless, or (most diabolical of all) sub-human. Do you really want to elimate an entire culture because of the actions of a few psychotic extremists?

As thinking, educated human beings we have the power and the responsibility to choose to be humane, to choose the path of goodness, to stay the course without giving in to base impulses born out of fear or the need for revenge. Even when others do not. It's what makes us civilised.
on Jun 23, 2004
Brad... This was a great article... I couldn't agree more... however...

I know Americans are not beheading people, but the middle east has been in virtual poverty for a very long time... because it is run by the 'Thugocracies...'

The People of the Middle East have no reason to believe that the western cultures actually care about them... They have been taken advantage of for years and years... to have a force like that of America come and sort your problems out for you - well, couldn't that be considered a little patronising?

We know that we are trying to 'help' them, and many Arabs are aware of this as well... unfortunately the general public is oblvious.

How do we show the people of the middle east that we do care about them? that they are indeed human and worthy of our respect? Truman had to drop a few bombs on Japan... we have to nip this problem in the bud before it gets to that stage I would hope...

BAM!!!
on Jun 23, 2004
What if we don't care about them Muggaz? We hate people like Hussein, bin Laden, and hate what they do to their own people, granted. In the end, though, we don't have to be doing this for the people of the Middle East. Militant Islam during the last two decades spread over Asia and into the Pacific island nations. While people like Clinton sought to pacify it, it went from regional to global. What happens when it takes hold in south and central America, where communist rebels *still* fight after 20+ years? A very similar circumstance to the situation in the Phillipines now.

So really, even though what we are doing could be really good for the Middle East, we don't have to pursuade them that we give a damn about them, any more than we had to persuade the Japanese. Maybe the problem is we have tried too hard to make that point? All they really need to know is that this spewing of hate for us will no longer be tolerated. Sure, we might help them rebuild, but the point is the tearing down now.
on Jun 23, 2004
Honestly, they need to look at history. Let's say they do plague us with gut-wrenching fear. What is Western civilization's knee-jerk reaction to things that scare us?

We kill it. Outright..and the kids and the livestock and even the neighbors usually.

People were afraid of Native Americans, Hitler was afraid of the Jews, people were afraid of other races. Our most violent, nasty, genocidal tendancies come out when we are most afraid. It's not like they aren't aware of our past sins, they spit them at us constantly. Do they think we've turned over a new leave? Evolved beyond it?

So, take the largest killing machine in the world, and scare it until it is disraught. Gosh. How's that for smart?
on Jun 23, 2004
So, take the largest killing machine in the world, and scare it until it is disraught. Gosh. How's that for smart?


Bin Laden has killed more Muslims than he has 'decadent Westerners', the Western (especially American) defence mechanism has gone into overdrive.
on Jun 23, 2004
What if we don't care about them Muggaz?


I dont know Baker... you tell me... All I can say is that, in spite of the countless radical's and terrorist, I still care about the Middle East as a people, and I dont want them to undergo any hardship, just like I dont want you to undergo any hardship... now you see my dilema.

Muggaz, maybe the middle east needs to wise up?


Yes, well, that is blatently obvious... are they going to do it by themselves? I dont think so... It would appear that some people are just resigned to the fact that a lot more people are going to die, and from where I am standing... you are just happy it's going to be them instead of you...

I was just blessed with a baby niece, and I dont want her to grow up in a world you seem to be advocating...

BAM!!!

on Jun 23, 2004
I agree with your point, but I don't think it was necessary or even accurate to say that the US considered the Japanese to be "subhuman."

"But what isn't talked about as much is that one of the reasons few Japanese surrendered was because the marines had little interest in taking "Jap" prisoners."

You don't seem to consider the possibility that this is because the Japanese used a tactic of falsely surrendering, and boobytrapping themselves. Or that they themselves treated captured Marines pretty poorly.
on Jun 23, 2004
Re your statement that in WWII the Japanese were considered subhuman, vermin, etc.:

The Germans -- BAD AS THEY CERTAINLY WERE -- did not have quite the reputation for torturing their prisoners that the Japanese had. And our soldiers knew this.

Also, you say "... the marines had little interest in taking 'Jap' prisoners". However, the Japanese did not let themselves be taken prisoner. They would rather fight to the death than be "dishonored" as a prisoner.

In many ways the Japanese did lack humanity. (Read The Rape of Nanking.) And, considering that they would never give up unless utterly crushed, President Truman saved many, many American lives by dropping the atomic bomb in Japan.

We are currently waging an entirely different kind of war than we did in WWII, but we do have to win, you know. What's wrong with Americans demanding harsher action in the war on terror?
on Jun 23, 2004
That reaction is actually what the terrorists want. This has been brought up repeatedly by DenBeste at www.denbeste.nu, and by the Belmont Club at belmontclub.blogspot.com. We already have the power to smash the middle east flat and the terrorists know it. What they want is for us to kill enough civilians that the populace will rise up alongside them, in the hope that we don't have the power or will to fight both the terrorists and the 'Arab street'. I think they're correct in the current socio-political environment, particularly with it being an election year in the U.S. But if another terrorist attack succeeds in the U.S., or the atrocities in the Middle East cross a certain threshold, then they'll get the total war they think they want, but I doubt that they'll enjoy it. I doubt the west would enjoy it much either, but if history is any guide, it's probably the case that to provoke the west into a total war end then lose is the best long-term option for the Middle East. Germany and Japan are certainly better off now than at any time since they tried to become imperial powers.
on Jun 23, 2004
John Ringo (over at FleetStrike.com) has talked about this for a while. Eventually the US and it's allies ar going to get fed up and the gloves will come off. I understand it's starting to already (Word has it that some SF units has been dropping the Ace of Spades lately).

One thing to consider is that the Korean unit deploying in August is the lineal descendant of the Vietnam Era Tiger Division. Japan is also sending troops. Neither Korea or Japan are exactly known for being nice in combat (The VC and NVA were very quiet when the Tigers were operating in an area, as they tended to be nastier than the VC or NVA).

On one webforum I'm on, which admittedly does lean Jacksonian, I'm seeing a rational move back towards some positions that were common right after Sept 11. Opinions along the lines of 'Kill 'Em All, God Will Surely Know His Own'. A few more beheadings and I suspect this will be a fairly common attitude in Flyover country. And that's not a good thing. I want terrorism defeated, but I do not want Arabic to be only spoken in hell

2 Pages1 2