Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
How beheadings are endangering Arabic lives
Published on June 22, 2004 By Draginol In Current Events

The reaction I'm seeing in my apolitical friends and neighbors to the spate of beheadings in the middle east is a mixture of disgust, anger, and perplexion (if there's such a word).  "How can a human being do this to another human being?"  If these Islamic terrorists believe their actions will somehow change US policy in the region in a way that benefits their cause then they're fools.

The practical result of these beheadings, I believe, is the gradual dehumanization of middle east culture.  The average person viewing these atrocities doesn't hang out on political forums going through the various nuanced arguments of various actions in the middle east. No, the average person simply sees these barbaric acts as inhumane and the product of a sick possibly subhuman culture.

It isn't Americans in the middle east I fear for. It's the Islamic Arab natives of the region I increasingly fear for.

In World War II there were essentially two wars.  The was the war in Europe and the war in the Pacific.  They were fought very differently.  In Europe, the Germans were considered human. Misguided. Maybe even evil. But still human.  The Japanese, by contrast, were considered subhuman, vermin, monkeys, filth to be exterminated. These beliefs led to the use of very different tactics.  In the Pacific war, few Japanese surrendered. But what isn't talked about as much is that one of the reasons few Japanese surrendered was because the marines had little interest in taking "Jap" prisoners. If tank battles come to mind in the war in Europe, marines with flame throwers come to mind in the war against Japan.  By the end of the war, US planes were simply working towards a policy of outright extermination of the Japanese people. Such is the power when one believes their opponents lack humanity.

Democracies are like that though. Democracies perform the policies demanded by the electorate. Americans, by and large, considered the Japanese to be subhuman and the US military obliged this in its policies. 

The worse thing that could happen in the middle east would be for the Arab world to convince Americans that they're not truly human. That they believe life to be so cheap that the US becomes more free to use less humane tactics to pursue its objectives.  Suicide murderers don't do their causes any favors by demonstrating to their opponents that the Arab culture is perfectly willing to treat its youth as little more than weapon ordinance. But these latest acts in Iraq and Saudi Arabia are far worse because they demonstrate a level of grotesque brutality that is alien to most Americans. Sprinkle a few scenes of civilian support for these atrocities and you help convince millions of Americans that these people aren't really sentient beings. Do these creatures of a conscience at all? Are they so devoid of empathy that they can butcher humans as if they were animals?

Far from changing American policy towards the middle east, these actions are likely to result in the American public demanding harsher action in the war on terror. After all, if they're not even human, any action can be justified.  For the sake of the Arab world, I hope that the civilian population is able to clearly signal their disgust at these actions and work publicly and effectively towards the elimination of the perpetrators of these heinous acts.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 23, 2004
David Eastman: That is the point that I made in my blog A Terrorist's Reckless Assumption.

Essentially what we have done in the past is go way over the top, and then regretted and tore away at ourselves for generations thereafter. All the regret won't help millions of dead Arabs, though, no more than it has conforted the Native Americans or the Japanese who survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

I have thought the whole time that the assumed "House to House" war in the Middle East was a bad assumption. We are doing it in Iraq with casualities, but with decent success overall. We did so because we knew that the vast majority of Iraqis wouldn't like us, but would be happy to see Hussein go. I think it has played out just that way. We face holdouts, but they are a small minority, and many are insurgents that would be fighting us elsewhere anyway.

I don't think for a moment that we would undertake such a thing on a grand scale in the Middle East. Counting on the rabble to rise up and overthrow the invaders won't count for much when we sit several hundred or several thousand miles away and pound them into total submission.

If it comes to "real" war, the hopes of the terrorists will be self-destructive. The only circumstance that would make it difficult is if China or some other real power were to step in and complicate matters.
on Jun 24, 2004
You are looking for..... "perplexity."

Other than that, spot on.
on Jun 24, 2004
Unfortunately, as dharmagrl demonstrates, the neo-cons have already won the argument and the world is soon to be hip deep in blood. And it won't just be Arab blood. It's going to be anyone who disagrees with the neo-cons blood.
on Jun 25, 2004
I would use the word "Orcs". I've used it since the dancing-in-the-streets reactions to 9/11.

And there is only one solution for an infestation of Orcs.

on Jun 26, 2004
I'm waiting for the Koreans to arrive. One truism to come out of the Vietnam War is that the NVA and the VC feared the ROK troops they faced.... and it has come to light on another web list I participate in that the Korean contribution to Iraq will consist of a significant number of special forces troops.

I fully expect that the first few "insurgents" that the ROKs capture will be made into very public, very very messy, examples.
on Jun 27, 2004
You would think in a nation as brutal as Iraq, when foriegn insurgents come in and blow up dozens of Iraqis every day, that the Iraqis themselves would be pulling them to pieces in the streets. Nope, though. Arabs blow up water and electricity plants, and everyone blames the US when Iraqis don't have water and electricity. This kind of propaganda wouldn't work if people weren't looking for excuses to hate us.
on Jul 02, 2004
>You don't seem to consider the possibility that this is because the Japanese used a tactic of falsely surrendering, and boobytrapping themselves. Or that they themselves treated captured Marines pretty poorly.

All surrenders in combat requires a bit of give-and-take since they impose risk on both parties. Mostly on the surrendering party, but there is also a risk to the ones accepting the surrender. It does't take many false surrenders to poison the well to the point that the capturing troops give attempted surrenders absolutely zero benefit of the doubt, because the risk to them is too great.

Suppose there is half a percent risk per surrender to the ones accepting it. And suppose they accept thirty surrenders. The total risk is 16%. Thats lousy odds when your life is on the line!
on Jul 02, 2004
"Orc" is clearly far too harsh. Orcs are totally irredemable EVEN if you raise them as civilized humans from that they are newly born. Jihadis are the result of long schooling and (de)socialization from both parents, governments and schools. Reform the latter two and they'll outweigh the first.

But I admit to smiling when I was watching Return of the King and heard the line that "The Orcs have landed on the West Bank"
on Jul 15, 2004
"How can a human being do this to another human being?"

Perhaps those that are doing it are not human at all. I can't belive a human is capable of such an action.
on Jul 15, 2004
I was very worried for a little while that the line would be crossed where the general attitude of the Military personnel over night. With the capture and possible beheading of a US Marine Link mixed with the immanent deployment of the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit Link into Iraq it was the perfect formula create a deadly situation. There would be no way to prevent the Marines of the 24th from finding out that a fellow Marine had been not just killed, but beheaded by terrorists. While Marines are among the most disciplined military troops in existence, it would strain even the strongest to the breaking point.

Until the entire story is known, I'm just glad that this young Marine was released. The subsequent investigation will determine if he was really abducted or if it was a hoax. I almost hope that it was real and he was able to let them know what would happen if they killed him, or someone else was able to convince them that beheading a Marine on TV would bring the wrath of god down upon the people of Iraq, and that at least one group of terrorists would now understand that it might be a real real real bad idea to continue this course.

Chris
on Jul 21, 2004
If you talk to any USAF pilots or Navy officers, one of the biggest things they will tell you is that everything in the armed forces is there for one purpose: to support the guys on the ground. We can't just head over to the middle east and 'flatten' or 'turn it into glass'. If we had a foolproof way of exterminating enemy troop formations like that we would have done it plenty of times by now. If we want to do anything in the middle east we have to have people down there, and that means that people are going to die.
on Jul 21, 2004
" convince them that beheading a Marine on TV would bring the wrath of god down upon the people of Iraq "

I don't think that the wrath of God holds much sway over these people, they are fanatical and don't infact beleive in the god I assume you are talking about. And the fact that these people are fanatical means that they are not going to stop even if this war on terror is "won", of course the fact is that it cannot be won unless all of these people are removed. And that is a disgusting situation.

I see comments here relating this war to the World wars. This is not the same by any means, this war has turned into something much harder to deal with, although on a smaller scale at the moment. Of course there were guerilla tactics used in the World wars, but not to this scale... and guerilla warfare has got to be the hardest warfare to combat.

I don't see any solution here, we clearly cannot kill all these people, that isn't even possible let alone it being an option (and surely even some of you people won't agree with killing every single person that fits a certain demographic?) - we also cannot re-educate them, as pointed out in several comments, they simply do not want to know. But we cannot lose sight that this is not the majority - this is a small percentage of people doing these things, we cannot persecute everybody for this.

As I said, no solution, there was a big problem in the Middle East before we arrived, now there is a different problem. It is too late to leave now, we have to stay and we have to continue rebuilding, and fighting.
2 Pages1 2