Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on August 4, 2004 By Draginol In Blogging

Right Wing News (www.rightwingnews.com), has an interesting discussion about building up your blog's popularity.  I feel a lot better having read it because I thought I was the only one who felt some of the frustrations he's felt.

 

JoeUser.com hasn't "officially" launched yet. We're still technically in beta (i.e. we haven't done any promotion).  Our Alexa ranking is around 25,000. Sometimes it shoots up when something written here gets particular attention but generally it hovers around 25,000.  We don't have a good traffic monitoring system on yet.  We do, however, know how many people are on at once and that number typically hovers around 200 to 300 depending on the time of day.

In the link (shown at bottom), John puts forth the simple rule of blog success: You have to keep at it for a long time.  Years.  And like me, he's faced frustration at not getting his articles linked to by the "elite" blogging sites such as Instapundit. Sometimes it does but it's few and far between. A handful of blog sites really have almost all the traffic with the rest scraping for the last bits.

That was what inspired JoeUser in the first place. I got frustrated with writing something that I thought was "good" (Relatively speaking, I'm barely literate <g>) only to have it just die off in the ether.  But if we could build a community of bloggers where we promote each other. Then it works out much better.  I think it's safe to say that the typical blogger here gets vastly (100X) more readers than they would on their own.  And together we are able to skip years of grinding effort to get noticed.  I have Right Wing News's website shown above precisely to make that point: In about a year, we've already passed it in daily traffic. 

While we have the readers, and by we I mean all of us combined, we don't yet have the respect.  We rarely get mentioned in blog round ups still. Hopefully that will change when the site is launched and the marketing people start doing their thing.  But for now, we're on our own to carve our own success  based on the quality of our collective writing abilities.

So keep at it, and you will build your own base of readers for your blog. JoeUser's unique system jump starts that base but it still takes effort and more importantly, persistence over a long period of time.

 


Comments
on Aug 04, 2004
I sincerely believe it would be better for JU somehow to feature more timely and serious articles. I must protest that most of the features are sadly lacking or seem to show off a clique. 
on Aug 04, 2004
I think the quality of featured articles varies from day to day.  You write excellent articles that I try to feature when I see them in time. Some days there's not much there to feature.
on Aug 04, 2004

That said, i think the quality of the featured articles right now is decent and has nothing to do with any "clique":

Besides this one you have:

+ Political round up (a bit lame but still links to timely articles)

+ Responding to why JU is the way it is

+ Judicial misconduct

+ Frustrated parenting

+ Ideological analysis

+ Will Michael Moore help Bush

+ In defense of an unpopular truth

+ blog on customization tech

+ Doom 3 first impressions

These are all fairly timely. And while I get more than my share of featured articles (I make no claims to impartiality on my own writings <g>), I don't see any clique type content and a reasonable variety of articles.

BTW, any articles in the Political Category get syndicated to www.politicalmachine.com.  (go to the main site and then look down at the bottom of the page for the most recent articles).

on Aug 04, 2004
Well, Brad, anything we can do to help.

When I get a little free time, I am going to try to "shop" some of my articles around to different sites to promote joeuser. I think you've created a format that's heads and shoulders above the other blog sites, and actually intend to be among the paying members in the fall.

(Just as a suggestion--maybe there's a way, to promote the "paid" memberships, that you can toss out a couple memberships here and there as prizes related somehow to blogging. Or maybe you're way ahead of me on this).
on Aug 05, 2004

brad, this tip from the linked article on 'how to build up readership' is very funny:

"remember that you will have to be very, very, good, for a very, very, long time, while working very, very, hard to promote your work and you will be very, very, underappreciated the whole time."

that article is very informative. somebody with 6000 hits a month on their blog must know what they're doing. thankyou for sharing it.

vanessa/mig XX
on Aug 05, 2004
The best way to get attention is to offend a horde of left wing fascists, then they will then write articles about how they have exposed you "mask" and how evil your writing is. All for jolly my old chap!
on Aug 05, 2004
Brad~ THanks for the info, it helps those of us who wonder about our own blogs sometimes. Thanks!
on Aug 05, 2004
frustration at not getting his articles linked to by the "elite" blogging sites such as Instapundit


Do you really think there's any blog on this site that compares in either quality or quantity to the "elite" bloggers? At least for the political stuff (which is all I read on JU), the very best articles--say, the best article of a week's worth of articles--might be level with, say, a below-average Andrew Sullivan piece.

This isn't a slam on JU so much as it is praise for the elite bloggers. For most of them, blogging or at least political commentary is their livelihood. Many write professionally. They put out a damn good product. Whereas people on JU generally seem to have other careers, and blog as as a diversion.
on Aug 05, 2004
"Left wing fascists"? Is that supposed to mean Stalinism? I hardly think the left bloggers are out to get Draginol whose articles--though the opposite of mine and others--are nevertheless respected overall.
on Aug 05, 2004
Brad, I appreciate that you spend the time to decide on what's  featured; I trust you feel you have better things to do. To your credit, I have noticed that the feature articles are cycled more frequently. As for your own articles being featured that is your prerogative, particularly since they are usually excellent. My apologies for the accusation of clique.
on Aug 05, 2004
"Left wing fascists"? Is that supposed to mean Stalinism?


No, it means a certain grouping of bloggers headed by one virulent left winger who thinks that I should be censored because I have an opposing view to him. To me, that is fascism, and for a "liberal" to suggest that free speech should be upheld by censoring those you do not agree with is truly ludicrous.
on Aug 06, 2004
So, will persistence pay at length-dear fellow bloggers, anyhow I keeo blogging in the meantime.