Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
A deeper understanding of the Maiar
Published on December 15, 2003 By Draginol In Movies & TV & Books

I've been a Tolkien fan for most of my life. I loved Lord of the Rings. But my favorite stories all take place in The Silmarillion, a collection of stories that take place long before the events of Lord of the Rings. It is in that book you get a much deeper understanding of the various characters.  You don't really get to scratch the surface of the real depth of middle earth in the movies. The books go into a bit more detail, particularly the appendixes at the end of Return of the King.

With Return of the King about to come into theatres, I figured now would be a good time to help give those of you who have enjoyed the movies and maybe even read the books some additional details on the characters and world that might make the series even more enjoyable than it already has.

Part I: Of Sauron, Gandalf, Saruman and the Balrog

These guys could be cousins. Literally. We understand that there is the race of men, the race of elves, the race of dwarves and even the ents. But Gandalf, Saruman and the Balrog belong to another race - the Valar.  Specifically, the sub-set of Valar known as the Maiar (basically those who are Valar but not as powerful). 

The Maiar are much different than the others. They are spirits essentially who can take on any form they choose. They can't die. Not in the way we think of death anyway. Instead, what can happen is that they can dwindle in strength to the point that they can no longer affect the material world.  Like all races, some Maiar are tougher than others. Balrogs are a particular type of Maiar. They're basically the name given to Maiar who took the side of Morgoth. 

Who's Morgoth? Well that's another discussion entirely. He was the one evil Valar. The most powerful, at the start, of them all possibly.  He was the most powerful being in Middle Earth. But ultimately he was defeated but his underling servant, Sauron the Maiar, survived and went into hiding until the Valar left again for the western most part of the world.

But getting back to how you can evil "kill" these guys, like I said, they can't die in the traditional sense. They can only be weakened to the point of being irrelevant. Sauron was once much much tougher than he is now. But he's already had his physical body destroyed twice. It isn't trivial, even for a Maiar, to come into physical being. When that body is destroyed, if the Maiar wants to again have a body it must expend its spiritual energy to do it. And that energy is lost forever. Morgoth expended much of his spiritual energy on making his armies and his weapons and other things.  That touches on the "magic" of middle earth. Magic, it could be said, is purely the spiritual energy of the various Valar or some of the first generation elves expended into a different thing. But once spent, it's gone.

Which brings us back to the ring. Sauron put much of his energy into a particular tool - the ring of power. He had to expend his spirit into it in order to make the ring powerful enough to dominate the other magical rings that had been made by an unusually strong elvish smith (named Celebrimbor who Sauron later killed). Think of the Ring of Power as being the magical equivalent of Black Orfice. With it, he could wield the power of all the various magical rings that had been created. But as you can imagine, doing that required sacrificing a great deal of power.  So if the ring is destroyed, Sauron will lose so much power that he will be effectively killed. He won't die though. He'll just be so impotent that he won't be able to affect reality anymore (i.e. the material world).

So what about Gandalf and Saruman? Why don't they seem so powerful?  5 Wizards. Technically called Istari. A special type of Maiar. Think of them as Maiar Cops. But they have been put under rules of engagement that they cannot break even if they want. For one thing, they have to take the form of men with all that comes with it (pain, hardship, hunger, etc.).  And, it could be argued, they actually had to invest more of their spirit in order to so accurately have the form of men. So if their bodies are destroyed, they risk not being able to form into a material form again.  In Gandalf's case, his spirit fled to the west when his body was broken during the battle with the Balrog. But he was decided he had remained steadfast and was sent back with his spirit reinvigorated and some of the invisible bonds that held him down loosened so that he could be more effective. 

You see, the Valar imposed these rules on the Istari because they didn't want Gandalf and Saruman to be tempted to go toe to toe with Sauron and take his place as a dark lord of Middle Earth. Clearly, given that Saruman became corrupted while even in his reduced form showed just how tempting it is for even Maiar to get corrupted when they're a lot stronger than those around them.  But Gandalf had proven his worthiness so the second time around he came back as Gandalf the white and much tougher than before. But still under all kinds of rules of engagement.  No going to the Dark Tower to battle Sauron one on one.  The Istari's job is to motivate the peoples of Middle Earth to work together to defeat Sauron.

As for the last 3 Istari that never get mentioned. No one really knows what the deal is with them.  One was named Radigast the Brown who makes only a brief appearance in the book and the other two are referred to as the "blue wizards" and just went off into the east never to be seen again.

So there you have it with regards to the Maiar. They are a particular group type of Vala who are pretty tough.  But to keep things in perspective, the first generation elves were about as tough as a Maiar. Elrond's ancestors could have kicked Sauron's ass. But we'll get to that soon enough...

 


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 16, 2003
Aren't you jumping ahead a bit. We haven't even got to the Númenor and the Númenorian Exiles yet, and the Wizard came after the conclusion of the Second Age.
on Dec 16, 2003
Don't you find the current trilogy ( with expectations of the 3rd installment ) much truer to the books than any other books- to- movies ?
I can still remember my excitement ( and dissapointment ) when Dune was put on film. Not to mention popular opinion of the final installment of The Matrix ( personally, I liked the last Matrix ).
on Dec 16, 2003

Aragorn and the background of Númenor is next.

Dynosoar, yea, I find the movies to be much more faithful to the spirit of the books. I don't care about specific accuracy to the written word as much as I care about the general spirit.

My only real gripe has been the handling of Arwen and Aragorn.  They have been together for 40 years. She's 3000 or so years old. There was never any angst over what they were going to do. That issue had long been solved and Elrond had long since come to terms with Aragorn on that issue.

on Dec 16, 2003
I have a bad gripe with the way they have portrayed Faramir... in the book, he comes across as wise, noble and learned... yet in the movie he can be perceived as ignorant, and power hungry - totally the opposite of what i though Faramir to be...

But in terms of the spirit, it truely is an epic adventure, and i personally know many a person who it has inspired to actually read the book.

Good article as well Draginol!
on Dec 16, 2003
I agree about Faramir. Though in the extended addition of the two towers they make him a much more sympathetic character.
on Dec 16, 2003
The name of the blue wizards is Alatar and Pallando. I think they were supposed to turn to evil and be used in later stories that tolkien never got around to.
on Dec 16, 2003
Thank you very much for this. "Who and what" the wizards were had been bugging me since I watched both extended editions last weekend. It all makes alot more sense now, your explaination was good.

I very much want to read all the books now, I've only ever read The Hobbit.
on Dec 23, 2003
Just a few technicalities: Gandalf, Saruman, Sauron, and the Balrogs are not Valar at all, but Ainur. The Ainur are described in the Ainulindalë (part of the Silmarillion) as the "Holy Ones" The Encyclopedia of Arda (http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/default.htm) has this entry for the Ainur: "The primordial spirits, who existed with Ilúvatar, and with Him created the world through the Music of the Ainur. After the creation of Arda, many of the Ainur descended into it to guide and order its growth; of these there were fifteen more powerful than the rest. Fourteen of these great Ainur became the Valar, or Powers of Arda. The fifteenth, Melkor, turned aside from that path and became the first Dark Lord. The many lesser Ainur that accompanied the Valar into Arda are known as Maiar."
Also, the singular form of these are Ainu, Vala, and Maia.
Radagast is spelled like this.
on Dec 23, 2003

Chad: They are of the race of the Valar.  Your statement is like saying Asians aren't humans.  Asians are Asians but they are also humans.  The Maia are of the Vala but are less powerful than the ones we tend to think of as Valar. Though it is ultimately semantics.

For people not into Tolkien, the point is that Gandalf, Sauron, and Saruman are all kin. Elves, Dwarves, Humans, Maia.

on Dec 29, 2003
The spirit of the films (having seen the 3rd installment last night) definately was in keeping with the books, the 3rd one almost being the best. The second film bugged me a little because it wasn't Gandalf that destroyed the orcs in the battle of the Hornburg (insidently there was also no elf/men alliance hence "The last Alliance of men and elves" being called what it was) it was the ents. But apart from that and the little matter of Faramir taking Frodo away instead of letting him continue his journey. Silly Faramir.

The third film rocks for all those who haven't yet seen it. Very very true to the books - so they missed out the scouring of the shire... big deal. (It was in the 1st film anyhow) and actually they did a better version of Faramir in the 3rd film because the relationship between him and his father and the lost Boromir was played out very well.

Oh and one other thing: regarding the story of Arwen and Elrond... I thought it was brilliant the way they put that into the film but to be honest Elrond did have a problem with Arwen and Aragorn (responding to Brad's comment) but it was much earlier in their relationship, Peter Jackson brought that quarrel forward in time because it meant the audience could understand why Arwen didn't just go to Aragorn at the start and why her fate was connected to the fate of the ring.
on Dec 29, 2003
I too was initially disappointed with Faramir's depiction in The Two Towers, but having seen the Extended Edition and heard a lot of the commentary on the extra discs I completely agree with their modifications. As written in the book, Faramir is actually a very flat and uninteresting character, already wise and humble, with no real development left to do. Their changes make him a much more flawed and therefore interesting person who undergoes a transformation in understanding what the Ring can do to people.
on Jan 02, 2004
Hi,
I did read a great "coffee table" book full of wonderful illustrations that explained the Maiar and the Istari in particular in detail. I wish I could remember the title. I, too, love the Simarillion. I have really only come to appreciate it as an adult though. I tried to read the History of Middle Earth series by Christopher Tolkein, but he is too bogged down in vacilating over which version of what Eldar name is correct and on and on...I think this article is a great explaination of characters whose powers and background are really only implied in both the books and the movies.
on Jan 05, 2004
Hellion: I never thought about it like that as i haven't had a chance to see the extended version of the two towers. That actually makes a lot of sense as to why they changed the character so dramtically.
Thanks.
on Jan 06, 2004
I've read through the LOTRs only 3 times, and each time I've read it, I admit to skimming, when Mr. Tolkein tended towards poetry. I guess I missed some interesting insights. The next time I read them (soon) I'll buckle down and read the "flowery" parts and maybe get as much out of it as some of you. Because.....D_ _ M! You guys know your Tolkein. As for the movies, they were well worth the wait. It's nice to have the visuals to go along with the story. Thanks to your insights, I know more about my favourite characters. (Aragorn and Gandalf) Thanks.
on Jan 06, 2004
As a reader of the trilogy and viewer of the recent films, I really enjoyed learning more about the mythology of middle earth. I tried reading the appendixes (sp) at the end of TROTK, but it was info overload. Thanks for the abridged synopsis!!
2 Pages1 2