Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.

For the first time since I became old enough to vote, I'm seriously considering sitting out a Presidential election.

Obama, on the one hand, brings nothing to the Presidency other than a radical agenda that seems to have little understanding of how the real world works.  There's no circumstance that I would vote for him.

But to me, McCain's actually worse.  Unlike Obama, McCain actually took away our rights.  His "Campaign Finance Reform" stripped a lot of my fundamental freedoms. For instance, if there's a candidate I feel passionately for, I couldn't take out an ad for them in a newpaper right before the election. My ability to support a candidate has been greatly curtailed.  For that reason alone, I wouldn't vote for him.

But McCain has so many other reasons not to vote for him. His position on immigration,while not different from Obama's, has been presented far more arrogantly than anything Obama has done.  I was against any kind of "path to citizenship" nonsense. I don't want "comprehensive immigration reform". I want the current laws enforced. It has nothing to do with "racism" as McCain and his minions suggested.  How about this: Our company spends tens of thousands of dollars each year paying for legitimate visas and other red tape to legally employ foreign workers.  For McCain to even suggest that those who break the law should get a slap on the wrist or be ignored isn't incredibly offensive.  Does McCain plan to pay us back the $100k or so we've had to pay to do things by the book?

McCain's positions also often strike me as just pandering to the media. He's against drilling in ANWR? Why? He wants to push various "green positions"? Why? I'm not saying he shouldn't, I just think it's obvious he supports those positions to pander to his left-wing buddies in the media. I doubt he's very familiar on the issue.

The only argument for McCain I can really see is supreme court justice picking. But realistically, the next two court justices likely to go are on the left anyway and McCain is not likely to pick particularly conservative jurors, particularly with the Senate so far left.

Obama's position on taxes and such are largely harmless to the people he's targeting because Obama is too clueless to understand how the tax system really works.  My favorite proposal was Obama's suggestion that people who make over $250k a year would continue to pay FICA. That's the kind of proposal that only someone cluessless about the tax system would come up with.  All he'd do is create an incentive for people to get paid in dividends or disbursements instead of going through payroll which, in turn, would start to cut into Medicare payments (which are already uncapped).

So I say down with both of them. There's no lesser of two evils this time around.


Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Jul 01, 2008

Like him or not, Its in your interest to vote for McCain, so I imagine thats what you'll end up doing.

on Jul 01, 2008

And Bush signed McCain/Feingold into law... that didn't stop you from voting for him in 04

on Jul 01, 2008

Like him or not, Its in your interest to vote for McCain, so I imagine thats what you'll end up doing.

I can get around anything that Obama does.

on Jul 02, 2008

I do agree with most of your points, and I am certainly no McCain fan, but I will be voting for him soley as a vote against Obama.  In my opinion, Obama is far worse as he is quite supportive of strict gun laws.  I won't even get started about his ties with radicals like Ayers and Wright.

 

on Jul 02, 2008

The easiest way to decide who to vote for without all the metal debate.



Pick a name, any name from the hat. easier than making up your mind on who's worse.
on Jul 02, 2008

I do agree with most of your points, and I am certainly no McCain fan, but I will be voting for him soley as a vote against Obama.
  This seems to be my philosophy too. 

on Jul 02, 2008
If you look at it another way it makes the system a little more fair to the little guy who doesnt have money to take out an ad for McCain. why should the party with the most money always win , poor people deserve it to be an equal playing field otherwise it is not democracy , the rich would get to win over and over again , which they usually do anyhow. but you are right McCain flip flops more then Kerry did. The media gave McCain alot of slack for his changing positions with the wind approach , but the one good thing he did was try to pass CFR.
on Jul 02, 2008
I pretty much agree with you in total! I may vote for Barr, or I may vote for one of the 2 clowns. I will vote, but not likely FOR anyone.
on Jul 02, 2008

I'm with you, Brad. I think either will be terrible for the country. Problem is, we are kind of stuck with the two party system.

I did run across another idea: http://www.mickeyforpresident.com/. Those guys are advocating a writein of Mickey Mouse for president to make a statement about how dissatisfied we are with this situation. Check it out, sign the petition...

on Jul 02, 2008

One thing missing from your calculus is war. Its easy to forget that we are at war... so I don't fault you for that.

on Jul 02, 2008

If you look at it another way it makes the system a little more fair to the little guy who doesnt have money to take out an ad for McCain.

why should the party with the most money always win , poor people deserve it to be an equal playing field otherwise it is not democracy , the rich would get to win over and over again , which they usually do anyhow. but you are right McCain flip flops more then Kerry did.

The media gave McCain alot of slack for his changing positions with the wind approach , but the one good thing he did was try to pass CFR.

Good intentions are swell. But the practical reality is that the poor don't get a voice still but the radicalized media got empowered.

As for the poor getting an equal voice - they already get a disproportional voice.  The rich pay most of the taxes and the poor get most of the benefit.

on Jul 03, 2008
Just because you pay more taxes it doesn't make you any more deserving nor does it make you contribute any more to society then the working man. most rich people wouldnt be where they are if it wasn't for them exploiting the poor for personal gain.
on Jul 03, 2008
Just because you pay more taxes it doesn't make you any more deserving nor does it make you contribute any more to society then the working man. most rich people wouldnt be where they are if it wasn't for them exploiting the poor for personal gain.


That's a very generalized and ignorant opinion. What's your beef with rich people? If you invented something and made $2 off each one you sold and 1 million people thought it was a good invention, you would easily make $2 million. Does that mean you are exploiting the poor? I have noticed every comment you have made is very ignorant, no wonder you sound like a Democrat.
on Jul 03, 2008
Not ALLL millionares got where they are from exploiting the poor. If you have a great idea that makes money , fantastic , Bill Gates is a guy I like , he came up with something that has helped us all..and he gives back to people through his foundation which is very admirable. But in regards to people in the Health Care Insurance and Oil industry they have made their money with blood on their hands. Plus any company that makes their products in third world countries so they can make huge numbers of folks poor and jobless here in the USA is wrong , so yeah they are exploiting. And just because someone on this board isnt a right wing nut job does not mean im ignorant , last time i checked Bush's approval rating was like 20 percent , and Obama is leading in the polls.
on Jul 03, 2008
Not ALLL millionares got where they are from exploiting the poor. If you have a great idea that makes money , fantastic , Bill Gates is a guy I like , he came up with something that has helped us all..and he gives back to people through his foundation which is very admirable. But in regards to people in the Health Care Insurance and Oil industry they have made their money with blood on their hands. Plus any company that makes their products in third world countries so they can make huge numbers of folks poor and jobless here in the USA is wrong , so yeah they are exploiting. And just because someone on this board isnt a right wing nut job does not mean im ignorant , last time i checked Bush's approval rating was like 20 percent , and Obama is leading in the polls.


LOL, you are definitely funny. Compared to the Democrat controlled Congress's 12% approval rating, Bush is actually doing pretty good. So now every rich person in this country is in the Oil or Medical industry? Keep talking, you are making my job easier by making a fool of yourself all by yourself. But I guess you don't buy products in the US or that would make you a hypocrite for buying products made by people being exploited by rich American people, right? What do you drive? Where do you gas up? What do you eat? How many charities have you given money to? Do you travel to other countries for medical attention? Hah, if hypocrisy was money you would be a multi-millionaire.

Keep in mind buddy that while you may think right wing people are nut jobs, most if not all your left wing hero's are rich and benefit from the same Medical and Oil industries your hypocrite nature is bitching about. And they too benefit from all that outsourced work the US has when they, also, buy the products and make money off them from their stocks as well. So you can take your hypocritical behind and go hide in a corner till you wake up from your fantasy.
4 Pages1 2 3  Last