Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on September 5, 2008 By Draginol In Republican

I've written about this many times in the past but one of the more off putting features of American liberals is their smugness.  If you disagree with them it is only because you are either ignorant or evil. This tends to result in them losing elections. Often.

I just read a very interesting blog about this that I thought I'd share here:

This conceit of liberals -- which sometimes I think is all that sustains them, and all that keeps them liberals in the first place -- that liberals have some sort of a monopoly on brains, wit, taste, and, yes, even basic humanity will be their undoing. It always is. They keep making the same mistakes over and over and over and over again, and we're the dumb ones.

They, the ones who have made the same ten mistakes every single election since 1968, are the smart ones. Right?

Let's check the list: Demean an opponent who you really ought to suspect might be rather intelligent as an ignorant boob, bordering on a genuine diagnosable moron, to such a degree that when the candidate speaks and reveals himself as reasonably intelligent, he actually seems to be nearly a genius.

Demean those who don't live in "cosmopolitan" cities as bumpkins who have nothing to contribute to politics or culture -- not their own ideas, their own aspirations, their own fears, their own traditions -- except for the votes they're expected to cast for the Democratic elites who scorn them.

And all the rest of it.

Now, after the fact, the left is convulsing and gnashing their teeth. How could we have allowed ourselves to so demean Sarah Palin as to turn her home-run speech into a genuine star-making speech by lowering expectations so much through our derision!?!

How could you have done that, you ask. That's not the right question. The right question is Is it even possible for you to avoid doing that?, because you do every. Single. God. Damn. Election. Cycle.

It works in my favor, and yet I'm still horrified to see you doing it every time.

Have you ever done anything else? Are you capable of doing anything differently? Even as conservatives snicker at you and tell you to your smug fat faces that you're making a gross strategic error, you continue doing so just the same!

We don't even bother to hide our snickering at you any longer. We don't bother to conceal this basic error from you -- we simply declare it. We don't have to hide this, we don't have to try to avoid tipping you off that you're making this mistake for the thirtieth time, because we know you won't listen anyway!

That's the truly delightful thing about this. We don't have to scheme with each other and say, "Quiet down, don't give the game away," when a fellow conservative points the error out. It doesn't matter! We can scream this from the rooftops for all the good it does you.

It's like we're fighting a war and we don't even have to bother coding our messages to the troops because we know there's no chance at all you'll even bother to pause to read our communications. "Don't bother us with your silly orders and tactics and strategies," you tell us, "We can figure out how to beat you silly people well enough on our own without any of your stupid-brained help."

You can? You sure about that? Well, whatever, buddy. If you think so. Seems to me you guys are 3-4 since 1994 -- a losing record -- but if you guys want to keep following the same game plan, be my guest.

Ultimately the liberals' sin is their smugness. Not even so much because most people recoil from the assumption of superiority, both intellectual and moral, by those who have accomplished nothing exceptional in life except for reliably voting and "thinking" liberal, as if casting a vote the "correct" way slaps 30 points on to your IQs and counts for 100 hours of community service and child mentoring.

No, the main problem with that smugness, that belief that you're sooo very fucking clever, is that you're actually not particularly clever at all, and the great gap between your personal estimation of your intelligence and the actual real-world measure of it is wide enough to stumble into and take a painful fall. Perhaps if you weren't so very convinced of your own innate entitlement to rule, you'd spend less time seething at a public unwilling to concede that rule to you, and less time trying to trick the public into voting for you by concealing your true beliefs, and more time trying to figure out what the public actually wants in its government, and how to provide with them with that.

You know the big difference between conservatives and liberals in terms of political acumen? You guys never see this stuff coming, because you're so convinced of your innate right to control other people's lives. You convince ourselves you're always the smartest guys in the room, and anyone who disagrees with you must either be so stupid or so luminescently evil they could never prevail in a campaign.

The Ronald Reagans and Sarah Palins surprise you, because you just can't even conceive of them. Your entire sense of self-worth depends on the proposition Liberal = Smart, Good, Conservatives = Stupid, Bad, so you can't imagine clever, good people opposing you.

You go into every election thinking the score is already 24-0 in your favor -- after all, you have nothing but vicious, racist, gay-bashing hobo-killing morons in your way. How can you, the Moral and Intellectual Elect of the Earth, possibly fail?

And yet you do. More frequently than you win.

Eh. I don't know why I'm bothering to tell you this. As you've demonstrated in every past election, you're not going to listen anyhow.

Ya fuckin' dunces.

Oh, and... Good job so demeaning her you half-convinced the public she was a drooling imbecile and yee-haw hollerin' bumpkin who'd embarrass herself on stage.

Sure, sure. Smart move.

A former beauty queen -- who could have imagined she might be comfortable in front of a large, critical crowd, and might in fact even thrive in the spotlight?

A former television sportscaster -- who would have predicted she'd have some poise and savvy playing to a camera?

Amen. I have run into this in discussions with family and friends when politics come up. I try to avoid talking politics because, like many of you reading this, I keep up with it very closely, I'm pretty knowledgeable on the topic.

Most people, left or right, aren't that up on the issues. Yet, despite their lack of relative knowledge on the issues, they will presume to be more enlightened or educated simply because they hold left wing views.


Comments (Page 5)
6 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 
on Sep 09, 2008

The problem, and you will probably deny it again, is that YOU claimed that Israel launched a large scale bombardment of civilian targets. And that is a lie.

Fair enough. Please allow me to restate;

In the process of attempting to neutralize Hezbollah, attacks launched by the IDF for that purpose ended up doing more damage to the civillian infrastructure and populace of Lebanon than it did to Hezbollah. If this were not the case, Hezbollah would have been destroyed. The IDF were even unable to take Al-manar off the air but were willing to level much of south beirut in the attempt.

The IDF didn't intentionally go after civillians. However, the argument that all the targets they went after were Hezbollah is also bunk. The truth is, they didn't know where Hezbollah was, rockets were still falling, and the pressure was on to do something. I do remember from the press conferences at the time (which I can look up, may still be on youtube) it was explained that Israel was "putting the pressure" on Lebanon, and that the bombing of the country would continue until the Lebanese themselves rose up and threw Hezbollah out of power. Yup, that was a real genius move indeed, which only strengthened Hezbollah further.

 In total, almost 17,000 buildings in Lebanon were hit, but yet Hezbollah had, by their own admission and in concurrence with most estimates, somewhere in the range of 3,000-5,000 fighters in the field. Their leadership remained intact. Their command and control, thanks to buried fiber that the IDF was apparently unaware of at the time, remained intact.

In fact, the bulk of their casualties were brought on by the ground invasion and subsequent fighting in the southern regions, and their ability to conduct attacks against Israel was largely unaffected by the majority of the IDF bombing, which did most of it's damage to the civillian infrastructure.

How is this an anti-semitic lie? All I'm stating is an opinion that Israel went about going after Hezbollah the wrong way. They believed that within a few days air attacks would have wiped out much of Hezbollah's operating capacity and then the mop-up would begin. Their intel was (obviously) very bad, they screwed up and got caught with their pants down. When this happened, they panicked and went after the most obvious and easy to take out targets, civillian infrastructure. This didn't work (obviously) turned sentiment in Lebanon even more against them than before and caused civillian casualties. Oh well, just more collateral damage I guess!

And don't think that I'm only pointing at Israel when I talk about this- we did the same thing to Serbia when we bombed the crap out of their country to get them to give up Kosovo as well, for which we are equally guilty!

on Sep 09, 2008

And don't you "oh Leauki" me in that patronizing way. You don't get it, do you. You are telling lies that cause death. I don't need you to patronize the victims or me. I need you to stop telling the lies.

Well, if you're going to be a grouchy-pants I guess there's nothing I can do about that.

If I'm telling lies, please, explain to me why they're lies. I've got an open mind. I realize there's not adequate space or time on a blog to explain something like this. Point me to some books I should read. Some websites I should go to.

These "lies" I've learned from reading people like Noam Chomsky, truly a barbarian terrorist if there ever was one who only wants peace and equality. What an audacious concept!

Also Chalmers Johnson whose predictions in Blowback (written well before 9/11) were almost prescient.

And, that truly evil "peace terrorist" Chris Hedges whose written several interesting books during his decades of working as a foreign correspondent covering all the nice little wars of empire that we never hear of back in the homeland.

on Sep 09, 2008

I think it's been proven that people who are more intelligent in the IQ, commonsense and academic sense are generally Liberal and non religious. I think it's best exemplified here:

No, that proves you have a bigger ego, but not intelligence.

on Sep 09, 2008

Ha ha ha ha ha Dr. Guy great one!


P.S. Blue let me remind you of Einstein

P.P.S. Oh yeah let me remind you of Da Vinci

P.P.P.S How about Dr. A.E Wilder-Smith

P.P.P.P.S Let me see here about Alvin Plantinga (you probably never heard of him)

P.P.P.P.P.S Simon Greenleaf (you probably never heard of him either.  He just an Original founder of Harvard Law School yes Harvard Law School)

P.P.P.P.P.P.S I could go on naming people for several decades and also go on about  how stupid, illogical, irrational your statement is or any research results would be for that matter.

 

on Sep 10, 2008

In the process of attempting to neutralize Hezbollah, attacks launched by the IDF for that purpose ended up doing more damage to the civillian infrastructure and populace of Lebanon than it did to Hezbollah.

You see, THAT is an opinion. It's not a statement of fact that happens to be untrue, but an opinion, an interpretation of true facts.

 

If this were not the case, Hezbollah would have been destroyed.

Unlikely. Hizbullah hid among civilians. It was impossible to hit Hizbullah without hitting  civilians. Israel had to choose between her own and Lebanese civilians. Hizbullah made sure that somebody would take the hit.

Israel evacuated her civilian population from the north. I know, I was being evacuated.

Lebanon could have done the same. In fact Israel asked them to the same, precisely because it was believed that Hizbullah could have been destroyed. And since Hizbullah knew that too, the Lebanese civilians stayed.

 

The IDF didn't intentionally go after civillians.

Quite a different statement from your previous one.

 

How is this an anti-semitic lie?

The previous statement was. You realise I was talking about the statement you made before I replied, not the corrected statement now, of course.

 

These "lies" I've learned from reading people like Noam Chomsky, truly a barbarian terrorist if there ever was one who only wants peace and equality. What an audacious concept!

That'll be the day when Noam Chomsky wants peace and equality.

We could have had peace and equality if the Arabs hadn't attacked Israel in 1948. And we would have peace and equality if the Arabs gave up trying to destroy Israel.

There is nothing Noam Chomsky can do, except make sure that Israel cannot defend itself. His version of "peace and equality" requires too many bodies.

 

on Sep 10, 2008

Artysim,

In your humble opinion how should Israel have dealt with Hizbullah?  What is the best way for any country to deal with an enemy like this?

on Sep 10, 2008

Leauki,

Don't forget they could have had it in 2001 as well.  Now all they're doing is drag their feet like a child having a tantrum. 

on Sep 10, 2008

Don't forget they could have had it in 2001 as well.  Now all they're doing is drag their feet like a child having a tantrum.

They could have peace and their own country (and no refugees) any time they wanted.

Israel BEGGED them not to join any attacks against Jews and to STAY when the Arabs invaded. But they didn't.

 

In Germany it is often said that the Germans will never forgive the Jews for the Holocaust.

I think it is also true that liberals will never forgive Israel for surviving.

 

on Sep 10, 2008

I think it's been proven that people who are more intelligent in the IQ, commonsense and academic sense are generally Liberal and non religious. I think it's best exemplified here:

That is a chart that was debunked years ago. look here.

http://deanesmay.com/archives/007337.html

That's one thing I found. Google "I.Q. republicans vs. democrats" and you will discover that was a myth which the liberals (the critical thinkers, the "question everything" guys) glommed onto with glee... and without question.

a lot of (real) iq statistics show that white people are smarter than black people, and that men are smarter that women too. do you believe that? you can read about it. but you won't touch that with a ten foot pole. but its ok to say that democrats are smarter than republicans because it makes you feel smarter.

it just shows that once again, liberals will say or do anything (even tell lies and promote misinformation) to win an argument.

i believe  that if you have to lie to make your point, your point is invalid.

i am not calling you in particular a liar, just misinformed like most liberals. 

on Sep 10, 2008

liberals will say or do anything (even tell lies and promote misinformation) to win an argument

i am not calling you in particular a liar, just misinformed like most liberals.

Looks to me that what has been proved is that there are both liberals and conservatives that will say or do anything

on Sep 10, 2008


Looks to me that what has been proved is that there are both liberals and conservatives that will say or do anything
[/quote]
i agree. but i have yet to see a chart showing that conservatives are smarter than liberals. so you tell me who's the sneakier group. or more desperate.
on Sep 10, 2008

how do you get those blue box quotes?

i need help with that cuz my iq is pretty low

on Sep 10, 2008

toothachesrevenge: press the quote button under each post, it has a weird ID etc. you can't just do quote /quote in this forum (took me a while, as well).

on Sep 10, 2008

Khamul89
toothachesrevenge: press the quote button under each post, it has a weird ID etc. you can't just do quote /quote in this forum (took me a while, as well).

Like this?

on Sep 10, 2008

Nope. I suck!

6 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6