Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on October 4, 2008 By Draginol In Politics

I've said before that there's no circumstance I would vote for McCain. But watching how he has dealt with this financial crisis reminds me why I would never support him. He's no maverick. There's no straight talk. He's just a politician with a marketing slogan who doesn't really know why he wants to be President.  He's Bob Dole II and he's going to lose like him.

Obama, by contrast, deserves to win.  I don't agree with Obama on any major issues. But he knows why he wants to be President.  Obama thinks the country, as it is today, is fundamentally flawed and that him and his Democratic congress will start to address those flaws.

I think Obama is naive and foolish but I have to give credit to someone who truly believes in his cause.

McCain, on the other hand, has no cause other than to be President.

Let me give you a few examples:

#1 The credit crisis

McCain takes the same view as Obama. Greedy wallstreet types. Bullshit.  The vast majority of Americans are culpable here.  If McCain were the straight talker he says he is, he would say into the camera that he has met the enemy and the enemy is us.  How many people do you personally know that have significant credit card debt? How many people do you know have refinanced their homes in the last few years and now owe more on their homes than their homes are worth? I bet the answer is: LOTS.

It's easy to blame bankers or wallstreet types for this crisis.  But they're less culpable than the American people are.  Real leadership would be to go up and say something like "We caused this together and if we want to solve it in the long term we need to quit blaming others and start living within our means."

I support the bail out. A lot of conservatives don't but I disagree with me.  A lot of conservatives don't necessarily realize that most of that bad paper ultimately leads to some individual's abandoned asset be it a house, a car, or some other big ticket item.  I recently bought 10 acres of choice property at half the price it went for 5 years ago.  Lots of banks are holding the bag on potentially trillions of dollars in fixed assets if individual Americans default on their loans. 

But sure, let's blame the banks and the financial institutions. It's a lot easier to blame them than the dead beat cousin or uncle we know who bought a $200k house with zero down, interest only ARM even though he gets fired from jobs every few months because "his boss was an asshole".

But let's be real, individual Americans caused this crisis. I'm more than happy to blame the Democrats who put pressure on financial institutions to get the poor into homes. But at the end of the day, it's we, the people who brought this on ourselves.

It's not greed and corruption on wallstreet that caused this mess. It's greed and corruption of millions of Americans who decided they wanted "stuff" they knew, deep down, they couldn't afford and then blame the banks and financial institutions for not being able to figure out the actual value of these assets now.

Where's McCain's straight talk?

#2 Valuing being buddies with his Senate colleagues more than serving the American people

McCain values experience over ideas. If one of his senate colleagues disagrees with him, he'll chalk it up to a "difference of opinion". Only on foreign policy is McCain willing to talk about what's dangerous.

You know what was really dangerous, McCain? Shoving a naive "campaign finance law" down our throats that restricts the ability of Americans to voice their opinions during an election. 

When it comes to affecting our freedoms, in a real world, practical, every day sense, domestic policy is more important than foreign policy and McCain has no real understanding or passion for it.

Obama has a passion for domestic policy. He believes in equality of results. He sees the gap between rich and poor and thinks the government should do something about it.  I think he's disastrously wrong but McCain will do little other than have a polite disagreement with Obama and Biden over basic issues that affect our basic freedoms.

McCain has plenty of passion about Obama talking about Pakistan but very little when it comes to Obama's vision of having the government take over our health care needs or Obama deciding how much people "deserve" to make or Obama's beliefs on how we should live, what languages we speak, and what cars we should drive.

If McCain deserved to win, he would be passionately defending the American people against what Obama really is.  There are millions of Americans who share Obama's vision for America and Obama is a fantastic advocate for them.  McCain is a terrible advocate for the millions of Americans who disagree with Obama's vision and deep down, we're not even sure if McCain even has a vision of what the American ideal is.

Obama would rather Americans have a poorer standard of living overall than to have such a gulf between the rich, the middle class, and the poor.  And there are lots of people who agree with him. But there are millions of undecided voters who don't realize what path Obama would take us towards.

A simple, passionate speech entitled "The government is not your baby daddy" by McCain could go a long way.  But no straight talk from McCain.

No, McCain will fixate on some comment Obama made about Pakistan rather than the substantial policy issues that Obama favors that would be ruinous to the American spirit.

#3 Nitpicking attack ads instead of substance

McCain's ads are almost all negative. I don't have a problem with that in principle but they're almost all petty and nitpicky.  If his ads were explaining the consequences of an Obama presidency that would be one thing.

McCain's ads should focus on a couple of topics and pound on them:

#1 LOWER THE DEBT. Explain how our borrowing is undermining our way of life and sapping our strength. Explain that yes, it's going to require freezing spending but as Americans, we can do it.

#2 ENERGY INDEPENDENCE. Explain how we're funding our adversaries around the world with our addiction to oil. Explain the plan to drill for more oil domestically, build nuclear plants and push for more clean coal tech while at the same time pushing hard for plug-in Hybrids and other types of vehicles that use energy that is cleaner and home produced.

#3 WRAP UP THINGS IN IRAQ/AFGHANISTAN. Explain how we are going to being drawing down troops in Iraq now that the situation is stabilizing and how we're going to continue to disrupt Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

That's it.  He's talked about these things a little bit but these are the 3 things he should just beat home over and over. They're all winning strategies and if he just pounded on those 3 things. 

Ads about "cleaning up Washington" are stupid and cliche.  We've heard these vague promises before.  Be specific.

Of course, McCain won't and that's why he deserves to lose.


Comments (Page 1)
5 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Oct 04, 2008

Obama, by contrast, deserves to win. I don't agree with Obama on any major issues. But he knows why he wants to be President. Obama thinks the country, as it is today, is fundamentally flawed and that him and his Democratic congress will start to address those flaws.

I think Obama is naive and foolish but I have to give credit to someone who truly believes in his cause.

McCain, on the other hand, has no cause other than to be President.

Let me give you a few examples:
I totally disagree with this premise.  I think McCain cares about our country and really wants to help turn things around.  I believe Obama simply wants to be famous as President and the slime balls that orchestrate his campaign want to CHANGE America into a socialistic society.  They want to decide who needs what and take from those who they decide don't NEED it and give it to those they decide do.

There may be a lot of Americans that deserve Obama as President but I deserve better!

on Oct 04, 2008

If McCain deserved to win, he would be passionately defending the American people against what Obama really is.
Now this I totally agree with.  McCain needs to take the gloves off and get angry if he's going to win.  He keeps saying he'd rather lose the race and put our country first.  Well if he really means that, he needs to fight.  He needs to put our country first and not let it be handed over to a party that wants to CHANGE Everything about it not just the things that aren't working.

on Oct 04, 2008

Don't be so fast to count out John McCain. And I would imagine that you would take the most interest in voting for McCain since you are at the top of Hussein's taxpaying hit list. It will trickle down to everyone else, but it will start with you, so you had better break out your pom poms and start cheering for McCain.

on Oct 04, 2008

I actually agree with both of you. I believe McCain does care, but he lacks the passion that Obama has to convince the people he does. In a time where things like American Idol, So you think you can dance, Top Model and Dancing with the Stars are what most people like watching, being a star is what people like now a days and Obama has been portrayed as nothing less than a RockStar, with a hint of Godlyness.

But, while McCain has not proven himself to be the right candidate for the job, I hate to think that Obama would be the only alternative, considering everything you explained here. So while he may deserve to lose, this is one time I hope crime does pay. Because being this passionless for the Position of President of the US by the part of McCain could be almost criminal.

So can I ask what you plan on doing? Will you refuse to vote or vote for the alternatives like Nader? Will you vote for Obama because, like you once said before, you would rather let the Democrats be fully responsible for the disaster their policies will create rather a Republican with similar policies?

on Oct 04, 2008

I agree with the woman! 

I think McCain does care about this country and he's already proven it thru the years of service he's put in.  He deserves this next position much more than Obama does. 

on Oct 04, 2008

I've said before that there's no circumstance I would vote for McCain. But watching how he has dealt with this financial crisis reminds me why I would never support him. He's no maverick. There's no straight talk. He's just a politician with a marketing slogan who doesn't really know why he wants to be President. He's Bob Dole II and he's going to lose like him.
Wow, I can't believe I'm reading this! Then again, though not as compelling, you more or less said the same when Bush was running for a second term.

on Oct 04, 2008

Anthony R


Don't be so fast to count out John McCain. And I would imagine that you would take the most interest in voting for McCain since you are at the top of Hussein's taxpaying hit list. It will trickle down to everyone else, but it will start with you, so you had better break out your pom poms and start cheering for McCain.

I am hoping McCain wins. I would never vote for Obama.

But you're wrong about the taxes. My taxes go up, I pass them on through higher prices.

on Oct 04, 2008

CharlesCS


So can I ask what you plan on doing? Will you refuse to vote or vote for the alternatives like Nader? Will you vote for Obama because, like you once said before, you would rather let the Democrats be fully responsible for the disaster their policies will create rather a Republican with similar policies?

I'll be voting for a third party right of center candidate so that at least when they comb through the election they can see a vote that would normally have gone for McCain.

on Oct 04, 2008

stevendedalus


 Then again, though not as compelling, you more or less said the same when Bush was running for a second term.

I was not an enthusiastic Bush supporter to be sure but Bush wasn't the one who pushed for campaign finance reform and Bush lowered taxes (McCain voted against the Bush tax cut).

on Oct 04, 2008

I don't feel that way about McCain.  I did get that impression from Palin though during the VP debate.  Way way too superficial and trying to get in tune with 'joe six-pack' during the debate imo.

on Oct 05, 2008

Way way too superficial and trying to get in tune with 'joe six-pack' during the debate imo.

Thisissomething I have see a couple of times and still don't understand. Whydoes it bother people that she was trying to relate to us joe/jane regular people? Let's be realistic here, we don't normally see politicians as average joes like us and we always complain about it, now that she is somewhat one of us and wants to show it, people complain? I just don't get it. I guess people like to be tricked, lied to and made felt inferior.

 

 

on Oct 05, 2008

Neither of them deserve to win because they both voted for (or renewed, with greater, more sweeping power) the PATRIOT Act and both of them voted for FISA.

That's reason enough to not vote for ANY candidate.

on Oct 05, 2008

wants to show it, people complain?

It's one thing to 'act like a normal joe', it's another thing all together to be condescending about it - which is exactly the feel I got from her 'folksy' gosh-darns and doggone-its.

Just remember - people liked Bush in 2000 becuase he 'seemed like the kind of guy you'd want to have a beer with'.  And just look how great THAT'S turned out.

on Oct 05, 2008

CharlesCS


Way way too superficial and trying to get in tune with 'joe six-pack' during the debate imo.
Thisissomething I have see a couple of times and still don't understand. Whydoes it bother people that she was trying to relate to us joe/jane regular people? Let's be realistic here, we don't normally see politicians as average joes like us and we always complain about it, now that she is somewhat one of us and wants to show it, people complain? I just don't get it. I guess people like to be tricked, lied to and made felt inferior.
 
 

For me, I don't need to see politicians as my buddy.  I want to see what their stances on issues are. 

I don't see how Palin ramming home 'affectionate' names for the American public means she's not lying or tricking people any more or less than the average politician.  But I guess I'm not as easily tricked or inferior as some other people (to use your words).

on Oct 05, 2008

Way way too superficial and trying to get in tune with 'joe six-pack' during the debate imo.
Thisissomething I have see a couple of times and still don't understand. Whydoes it bother people that she was trying to relate to us joe/jane regular people? Let's be realistic here, we don't normally see politicians as average joes like us and we always complain about it, now that she is somewhat one of us and wants to show it, people complain? I just don't get it. I guess people like to be tricked, lied to and made felt inferior.

People have become so jaded about politicians, they are no longer reliable judges about when a politician is being sincere or not.

Palin aside, if there was a politician that truly was a 'joe-sixpack' or 'hockey-mom', you would still see the same types of responses and judgements. In short, painting them all with the same broad brush because of their occupation.

In a way, we (the public) are all becoming bigots as far as politicians are concerned.

5 Pages1 2 3  Last