Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Kerry wins by a larger margin than anticipated
Published on November 1, 2004 By Draginol In Politics

With the election tomorrow it's time for predictions. Based on using The Political Machine's issue based predictions and looking at polling data and trends, this is what I'm concluding:

Kerry victory with 306 electoral votes to Bush's 232.  This is a much clearer victory for Kerry than any of the polls and pundits are showing here. But then again, they don't have The Political Machine.

So what do I base this on?

  1. The Iraq war isn't a positive for Bush but in fact a negative.

  2. I think the Democrats are better at mobilizing their base. This has to do with demographics. It's easier to get people to the polls in urban areas than rural/subburban areas. As I explained to a neighbor, there's roughly 200 people in our neighborhood. It would take hours to pick us all up and take us to a precinct to vote. By contrast, there might be 500 voters in a single building in Cleveland.

  3. I think fraudulent voting is going to be a real issue. It's a lot tougher to challenge fraudulent voting than it is to try to preserve the sanctity of the system. It's disappointing to think that my vote might be counter-balanced by someone's cat or "Dick Tracy" but our sensational media has clearly decided that it's better to have 1000 fraudulent voters get through than to prevent a single legitimate voter from being turned away. I disagree. I think there should be a balance because a fraudulent voter is effectively taking away the voting rights of someone else by canceling out their vote.

  4. The "early voting" mechanism is going to be the big story this year. Early voting favors less committed voters which tends to favor Democrats.

  5. That ridiculous "missing explosives" story from last week that looks to have not had any reasonable basis in fact (latest news on that is that a US unit actually removed the explosives at the end of April). But the media ran on that for a full week which may have been enough to tilt the balance in Florida, New Hampshire, Ohio, Wisconsin and Iowa to go for Kerry.

But in the end, if Kerry wins, it will be that first Bush debate that caused Bush to lose. The momentum was in Bush's favor and he so blew that first debate that it shifted momentum that he has not been able to recover from.

So there's my prediction. Not nearly as close as the pundits are predicting.

That said - EVERY informed voter should go out and vote. So even if you're in a blue or red state, go and vote tomorrow. I think the good news out of this election would be that we may have record turn-out which I think would be fantastic regardless of who wins. 

You Republicans who are hoping Bush wins better do what you can to get your friends and neighbors and family out to vote. Because you can be assured that the NEA (teachers) and other unions and other organizations are way ahead of Bush and his allies in organizing get out to vote on election day drives.

This election is going to come down to a handful of votes. Particularly in Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Minnesota.


Comments (Page 1)
5 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Nov 01, 2004
I hate to agree with you Brad, but I believe this is a very accurate scenario.
on Nov 01, 2004
mmm I hope you are 100% correct in this prediction, Brad...the Political Machine model is actually quite similar to what electoral-vote.com is reporting today -- 298 Kerry vs. 231 Bush with NM and RI tied.
on Nov 01, 2004
Osama bin Laden lives. I say Churchhill and FDR were right. Fight this murderer until he can hide no more. Never give in to tyranny. Fight him with the most powerful weapon you have, your vote. Vote Red State for Freedom.
on Nov 01, 2004

Interesting article. If the political machine is this good, I may have to download it after all (and give up playing GalCiv for a while - that may prove to be hard).

Obviously, I hope that your prediction is correct, but more importantly, if it is, then I hope that the two parts of America will settle their differences. It has been a quite scary last fourtnight, with threats and allegations from both sides.

On a side note, I think that Bush's pledge to remove Castro from power may just swing Florida in favor af the Republicans.

Morten
on Nov 01, 2004
Well, if the Political Machine hits in on the head that accurately, who knows... you might be able to license the engine to the media as a predictive tool for other elections too
on Nov 01, 2004
This will be an excellent litmus test for the political machine's accuracy. It would be a boon for stardock if your analysis was dead on. Good luck!
on Nov 01, 2004
Interesting, Political Machine is a great game, but a great tool for election predictions? We'll see tomorrow!
on Nov 01, 2004
Interesting article Brad! The fun begins tomorrow morning, lawsuits to follow for the next 6 mos
on Nov 01, 2004
This election is going to come down to a handful of votes. Particularly in Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Minnesota.

I agree with this statement Brad, however I feel Florida and Ohio will go to Bush. The polls are just too close. Also, the game is so much fun! But unfortunately, it cant predict other entagables... such as weather, work, traffic, polling lines etc. I think it will be much closer than you have it here...
on Nov 01, 2004
NM and RI tied.


Being a RI'er, I nearly died when I read that and had to go check it out--NM and NH are predicted as ties. RI is as blue as it can go!

I'm interested in seeing how close the Political Machine is, Brad. When it was announced in the papers a few weeks (months? I don't remember) ago, my roommate, who works on Capitol Hill, emailed me the story with a comment like: Do you believe this? Some computer guy thinks he can predict the election. I was trying to cover up my blogging addiction (which is still a secret to most) while also letting her know how cool the game is (and avoiding all questions about why I would have any knowledge of it). She remained doubtful, so I'd like to be able to gloat --very mature of me, I know.
on Nov 01, 2004
It's been my experience that a lot of people vote with their hearts and not with their heads; some with neither. That presents a conundrum for any game engine or for that matter any AI developement. Your average Trekkie knows that! Best of luck with the game, however I don't think it can be relied upon as an accurate barometer. This election has stirred quite a firestorm of emotions. Those come from the heart.
on Nov 01, 2004

It's going to be really close in a bunch of different states. That's the thing, a few points more in war in Iraq and the situation changes dramatically.

Ohio, Florida, Iowa, New Mexico and Wisconsin are all up in the air. Just moving a slider a few milimeters one way changed the results in some of these states.

on Nov 01, 2004
It'll be interesting to see how close your model ends up being to the actual results. I'm with Historyishere on this one, you should license it to the media as a visualization/prediction tool. It would certainly rock to see news anchors playing a video game to explain results or to predict outcomes.

on Nov 01, 2004

On a side note, I think that Bush's pledge to remove Castro from power may just swing Florida in favor af the Republicans.

I did not hear that one.  But unless he has a lot of banana peels, I kind of doubt that!  I am hoping Brad is wrong, but if Bush made that statement, that is desperation.

Got any Banana peels? !

on Nov 01, 2004
I'm with Historyishere on this one, you should license it to the media as a visualization/prediction tool. It would certainly rock to see news anchors playing a video game to explain results or to predict outcomes.


Yeah, they already use videogames to predict the outcomes of sporting events!
5 Pages1 2 3  Last