Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.

Before…

image

 

After…

image

 

Stardock’s new killer app: Fences. Download it, it’s free!

https://www.stardock.com/products/fences


Comments (Page 3)
6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Feb 09, 2009
nice I gave it a try, it reminded me of something then it hit me , Windows 3.1
on Feb 09, 2009

draig
nice I gave it a try, it reminded me of something then it hit me , Windows 3.1

on Feb 10, 2009

This is strange.....

When I save a file to my dasktop, it seems to not be there, I can't see it anywhere, when I browse to my desktop with explorer or any other app to open the file, it's there and easy to see.

Is this a bug? feature? setting somewhere?

Thanks

Tech42

Tea anyone?

on Feb 10, 2009

Tech42
This is strange.....

When I save a file to my dasktop, it seems to not be there, I can't see it anywhere, when I browse to my desktop with explorer or any other app to open the file, it's there and easy to see.

Is this a bug? feature? setting somewhere?

Thanks

Tech42

Tea anyone?

Fences is placing files saved to the desktop above and/or underneath icons that are already on it, in fences.  It's really distracting, especially when you save a crapload of things to the desktop, because every time you go to move one of them, it "rearranges" all of the icons again in basically the exact same order as before except it moves everything up one.  I think I even see this same phenomenon with auto-arrange off but I can't remember.

In any case, a "default" fence does not appear to exist, and would be a very good idea indeed.

Someone else in another Fences thread said you guys should do this for folders too-if you do you have my money as well.

on Feb 10, 2009

Sole Soul


Fences is placing files saved to the desktop above and/or underneath icons that are already on it, in fences.  It's really distracting, especially when you save a crapload of things to the desktop, because every time you go to move one of them, it "rearranges" all of the icons again in basically the exact same order as before except it moves everything up one.  I think I even see this same phenomenon with auto-arrange off but I can't remember.

In any case, a "default" fence does not appear to exist, and would be a very good idea indeed.

Someone else in another Fences thread said you guys should do this for folders too-if you do you have my money as well.

Thanks for th info....and the great suggestion....now I have to move everything in all my fences....

on Feb 11, 2009

Fences receives the Ironclad stamp of approval

on Feb 11, 2009

It also has the P.F.E.T.O.M. thumbs up too.

on Feb 13, 2009

Jendricio

Quoting Zubaz, reply 20
On the about page, there's now a button "Debug Info" ; give it a click. If you can't get the dialog open at all, go there directly by heading to "%appdata%\Stardock\Fences\TroubleshootingLog\". Post the file shown at that location ("fences_debug_info.txt").
 
Thank you. So, I installed it again.

Can reproduce the error everytime.

I fiddle around with fences a bit and I get a system crash on right-click trying to move a file to the trash can. If I move it by hand, it works and does not crash.

Otherwise: Explorer.exe is crashing, then drwtsn32.exe, with that the system is down.

My .NET 2.0 Version is v2.0.50727.

I sent you, Zubaz, the Debug-Info per pm. It's pretty long...

 

 

@Zubaz: Any info on my problem?

@Others: Should I post the logfile here (it is very long)? Or just simply wait for the next version?

BTW: It definitely interferes with something. Installed it on another XP machine and works as it's supposed to.

on Feb 13, 2009

@Zubaz: Any info on my problem?
No info.  But the dev got the log.
@Others: Should I post the logfile here (it is very long)?
No.
Or just simply wait for the next version?
Yes
BTW: It definitely interferes with something. Installed it on another XP machine and works as it's supposed to.
This indicates something unique to your system.

on Feb 13, 2009

Is there an option to tell the non fenced desktop to stay visable by default?

 

If not i suggest you add an option that allows the user to have the normal unfenced desktop space remain visible.

 

Cool toy (insert evil laugh, #984389732072369-28703272174.7425654 here "now i finally have a way to keep my desktop clean but keep the my computer and networking stuff on it since i hate the needing to use the start bar to access them")

-Gabe, who still uses 2k and 98se on some of his towers.

on Feb 13, 2009

The originally released version was working fine on my XPP machine.  Updated my NVIDIA 8600M drivers yesterday and now the fences hide with double-click on the desktop but the icons within them stay put on the desktop.  Same behavior as the .037 update was demonstrating.

on Feb 13, 2009

This indicates something unique to your system.

Correct. To my system, however as well as others.

I will compare the processes of the systems. It works on my old XPhome Computer and on this newly acquired XPpro it ain't workin'...

Thanks for your support.

on Feb 13, 2009

Correct. To my system, however as well as others.
SP3 seems to be fairly common but doesn't reproduce consistantly.

on Feb 14, 2009
Can someone explain how this is better than Object Dock Plus with a tabbed background? I can set it to hide the dock without clicking on anything. At least I can access Object Dock Plus even when I have other applications open in full screen mode. Is it because the fences have a semi-transparent background? That feature is available in a lot of Object Dock backgrounds. With Vista Home Premium, I can use Alt-Tab and select my basic desktop if I want an easy way to hide what I have open.....I sure hope I find some answers or that the final product offers something new and imposssible to resist, or, I'm staying with Object Dock Plus.   
on Feb 14, 2009

that the final product offers something new and imposssible to resist

Like if it worked inside folders, too.

OM NOM NOM NOM NOM.

But it's useful enough for me as is, so YMMV.

6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last