Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.

When I write political blogs, I make it my business to be harsh about the poor and down trodden. If I seem like I don’t have a lot of compassion, that is probably because I don’t have a lot of compassion.

I don’t really like humans in general. I like individuals, however, a lot. Maybe I’m just the end product of the secular agenda. Humans are merely another large mammal that is barely self aware is driven mostly on instincts. Where instincts don’t fill in the gap, most humans are just a bunch of dumb apes that fill in those holes with social conditioning.

Now, in practice, my wife and I care a lot about individual people. Just because 95% of the human population is a waste of resources doesn’t mean the human race is a total loss.  We spend a considerable amount each year helping causes and individuals who have suffered due to no fault of their own.

On the other hand, whenever I meet a liberal who talks about compassion, I find they rarely do anything for others. They feel it’s their tax dollars job to help others – taxes they tend to barely pay.

For years, my observations were just that – observations. Anecdotal. Luckily, the book “Who really cares” provides statistical analysis on this sort of thing and shows that yes, the more liberal and secular you are, the more stingy you are with your own money.

Doesn’t surprise me too much that it’s usually Democrats who seem to have problems paying the taxes they owe.


Comments (Page 5)
6 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 
on Feb 20, 2009

Maybe you had a "blond moment" too (sorry, Jill). The book and the statistics it cites is evidence.

I agree!

on Feb 20, 2009

Maybe you had a "blond moment" too (sorry, Jill). The book and the statistics it cites is evidence

If you're going to quote me, make sure you read what you're quoting first or you make yourself look foolish.

on Feb 21, 2009

If you're going to quote me, make sure you read what you're quoting first or you make yourself look foolish.

I read it.

 

on Feb 21, 2009

Not well enough, evidently:

doesn't need any evidence to back it up other than people being told to buy a book

Maybe you had a "blond moment"...The book and the statistics it cites is evidence

on Feb 21, 2009

the book is not evidence, it is a collection of evidence and its interpretation and it CITES its evidence. The evidence cited by the book is the evidence (the author did the legwork of finding it).

on Sep 04, 2009

If memory serves, btw, the author is liberal. He did not set out to show that conservatives are more charitable.

on Sep 04, 2009

The discussions about the public healthcare system have taught us a lot about how people define altruism and charity.

 

on Sep 04, 2009

It came as a surprise, but I now think that the democrats are honestly and accurately representing the people on the street. People really beleive they are entitled to someone's elses hard work, and that charity means taking from others to give to those whom they deem less fortunate.

this reminds me:

http://www.brunothebandit.com/d/20080714.html

on Sep 08, 2009

the book is not evidence, it is a collection of evidence and its interpretation and it CITES its evidence. The evidence cited by the book is the evidence (the author did the legwork of finding it).

Depends on what you want to call "masses of evidence". I do understand that a book filled with statistics is not "evidence" when it comes to conservative arguments. I also understand that liberal arguments usually have to be bought without any evidence at all and that any request for any form of evidence is considered impolite and odd.

Hence, and I cannot find another explanation for it, the term "masses of evidence" as the only opposite of no evidence at all.

For all the time you spend here, you people STILL don't get it, do you?

If any evidence proves (or even indicates) that conservatism is more compassionate than (or logical, or common-sensical, or is otherwise superior to) liberalism, it's to be considered viewed as dubious and questionable, at best.

Any evidencde to the contrary is to be accepted without any question at all.

Get it now? SHEESH!

on Sep 08, 2009

The author is president of the American Enterprise Institute (a conservative think tank), so he is probably not a liberal.

on Sep 08, 2009

The author is president of the American Enterprise Institute (a conservative think tank), so he is probably not a liberal.

I don't think anyone who sees those stats will remain liberal for long.

 

on Sep 09, 2009

There is this assumption that all sides of the argument must be equally right. It is nonsense. Someone must be wrong.

Logic, common sense, intelligence, and fact turn people towards science and conservatism.

Emotion, superstition, unverified assumptions, predegices and wishful thinking turn people towards religion... (liberalism is a religion)

on Sep 09, 2009

Logic, common sense, intelligence, and fact turn people towards science and conservatism.
---taltamir

Ture. But then, most American conservatives believe in, and support belief in, Jesus Christ, while liberals denigrate Christianity (while honoring most all other faiths, which I'll never understand; but oh well, I've stopped trying, anyway) and seek Jesus' expulsion from the culture.

on Sep 09, 2009

Ture. But then, most American conservatives believe in, and support belief in, Jesus Christ, while liberals denigrate Christianity (while honoring most all other faiths, which I'll never understand; but oh well, I've stopped trying, anyway) and seek Jesus' expulsion from the culture.

You can keep your Jesus and public Christmas parties and for all I care government buildings can also put up Christmas tree, not as an affirmation of Christianity but because a majority of people will like looking at them.

Just make sure that I don't have to participate.

 

on Sep 09, 2009

Ture. But then, most American conservatives believe in, and support belief in, Jesus Christ, while liberals denigrate Christianity (while honoring most all other faiths, which I'll never understand; but oh well, I've stopped trying, anyway) and seek Jesus' expulsion from the culture.

an interesting observation. but the two work on different scales which are parallel to each other.

That is, a person indocrinated into faith in christ is probably not being indocrinated into faith in multiculturalism at the same time. Besides which, most people beleive in ONE religion. and the religion of liberalism is highly incompatible with the religion of christianity. When was the last time you met a person who is both a christian AND a muslim at the same time?

A person is perfectly capable of showing intelligence and logic in some aspects of their life while eschewing them for faith in others.

@Leuki: I am all for places putting on christmas stuff in christmas instead of this "happy holidays" bullcrap. And I am an atheist from a jewish background. This whole "lets offend 90% of the population to not offend 10% of it" thing is crap. Have some god damn pride in your heritage and culture.

6 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6