Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on December 31, 2009 By Draginol In WinCustomize News

image The decade is over in less than a day. EnGadget has a great article on the top 10 gadgets of the decade.

>> EnGadget


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jan 03, 2010

So, using your fingers (so as not to get lost/confused along the way) count 31 December 2001, 31 December 2002, 31 December 2003 and so on until you get to 31 December 2009... um, that's the one that's just gone by. Anyway, it's at that point you will notice that you have a tenth digit sticking up and unaccounted for... that digit, and you don't need to hold it up 'til midnight on December 31 2010, by all means use it in the meantime, is to count the tenth and final year of the decade.

You silly bugger...the first finger you stick up is for 31 December 2000.

You WILL run out of fingers at December 31 2009....exactly where you are supposed to....unless you have extraneous digits.....

....[and keep THAT one in yer pants]....

0 to 1

1 to 2

2 to 3

3 to 4

4 to 5

5 to 6

6 to 7

7 to 8

8 to 9

9 to 10

That's ten [10]

BTW....we just left the 20th [twentieth] century....second millennium.....

...and are now hanging out in the second decade of the 21st [third millennium].....

And that Twentieth century was the one I was born in...had a date of '1954' .... Spell checker

on Jan 03, 2010
and are now hanging out in the second decade of the 21st
Not until the end of 2010!
on Jan 03, 2010

Not until the end of 2010!

Only if you were born in the 19th century....

on Jan 03, 2010
Only if you were born in the 19th century....
No, like you I was born in the 20th Century; the 4th decade.
on Jan 03, 2010

Who's on first....? No...Who's on decade.    What is it with you people?  

 

on Jan 03, 2010

What is it with you people?

Just making an academic point after being encased with relatives over Christmas and the New Year.

on Jan 03, 2010

Two thirds of respondants here say the decade ends on 31 December 2010

Most people here agree... in fact, the best answer is 2010.

This writer suggests both 'camps' have a case in point

Here the poll says 56% for 2009, 44% for 2010... yet the comments area suggest the opposite.

And the consensus here is 2010.

 

on Jan 03, 2010

on Jan 03, 2010

starkers...counting starts FROM zero....WITH one as the first whole integer.  Ten becomes the tenth integer ARRIVED AT, not passed.

I don't think you can rely on 'majority rules' as the majority can often still be wrong.

As already stated...1954 occurs in the Twentieth century, not the Nineteenth....and the same applies with all instances of counting.  The year 54 AD similarly occurs within the First century and the year 154 will be within the Second century, etc., ad nauseum....

Lantec is right...I think I almost single-handedly hijacked Brad's thread well and truly....so back on topic....[with tongue firmly in cheek]....The first decade of the third millennium HAS ended, so Brad's thread IS correctly timed....

on Jan 03, 2010

I don't think you can rely on 'majority rules' as the majority can often still be wrong.

Like when everyone believed the Earth was flat.  Anyway, as far as the dacade thing goes, there are two camps and we obviously aren't in the same one, so we'll agree to disagree.

.I think I almost single-handedly hijacked Brad's thread well and truly.

Not without considerable assistance from me.  Sorry Brad.

on Jan 04, 2010
WITH one as the first whole integer
I see you are starting to come around.
Ten becomes the tenth integer ARRIVED AT
No, you have only used nine. I note that you settle on the middle of the class intervals when justifying your statistical analysis. It is the class boundaries that cause the problem, not the middle. Anyway, Christmas has finished, the relatives have gone home and I can get back to normal, but I shall remain firmly in the mathematical camp.
3 Pages1 2 3