I think if the AI is capable of handling the Dynasty system then such approach should be taken to enhance the races in a custom way. I am not to sure how wise it would be to make the customization completely player controlled. Maybe the Tech Tree can change in a random way using the Dynasty system depending on ones chooses. I think that the essence of the sovereign should be the "Key" to randomly(but intelligently for balance) remove or keep certain choices in the customization proses. Then after all that has been selected have the Dynasty system create a random Tech tree based on the attributes of the sovereign and the chosen race. Thus creating truly unique and different units who's history and back story can be traced all the way back to the sovereign himself.

 Vision:

1. Create my custom sovereign.

2. Create my custom race using some of my sovereign's essence. (The Dynasty system will allow or not allow certain      choices to be available for the custom race creation based on the choices made for the Sovereign.)

3. The "marriage" of the Sovereign and the Race will make the Tech Tree which will use the dynasty system to create the available units that can be produced and created as the buildings and cities are created.

4. Once one has the proper buildings/tech to access a unit one can further customize it by creating a custom class and customization of the units gear, looks, names, back stories,etc.  The available class choices (at time of creation) should be a "marriage" of the Race and the researched tech/building. Example archery building would give choices to create range units, barracks would give choices to create melee units, arcane tower gives choices to create mages and so on and the special abilities, feats, skills will be related to the race.

5. For epic levels allow the creation of  custom multi-classed units once again using the dynasty system to insure randomness and keep the game balanced.

6. The creation of custom heroes (multi race) from the sovereigns own blood (sort of demigod). *This is the already implemented dynasty system*.

The trick is to not have all the possible game resourses available as a choice during customization, but limit this based on the choices and the randomness of the Dynasty system to insure uniqueness, balance and the possibility of hybrid multi-classed units as the game developes as well as hybrid races.

Now as a consumer if I read on the box at the store there are only two races I will walk away from the game in two seconds never reading further. But if I see the word "CUSTOM". "CREATE YOUR OWN", "ALWAYS UNIQUE", etc  I will read more and find out about the depth of choices and the unpredictability the Dynasty system offers, plus all the other awesome things available with the game Modding, pnp style maps or 3D maps all in the same game now that would be something I had to try out.

I love choices, customization, but not at expense of game fun and balanced game play. It does not do me any good to have pre-made races if I never play them because the ones I make custom are far superior thus making the use of the pre made races as an opponent is also pointless. However making my own and having an AI that can properly use them in game play that will make custom FUN! (One does not always have someone to play with and the AI needs to take the place of another person at a moments notice using custom content with out the AI "breaking" *Grins*

I think this idea for factions is brilliant and I think players should be able to upload their races and download other peoples so the AI will get to use these custom races.

Would it have to be a very simple list?

Could there be some specials as well as +/- bonuses?

For example

• Water Walking (For a lizardman race)
• Regeneration (For a Troll race)
• Winged (For a Draconian race)

Also assuming you can make things visually smaller for races like dwarves, could we also make them bigger for ogres & trolls? (even if theyre small compared to wild trolls)

Please please pretty please with sugar on top.

I think this is a terrible idea.I want fully fleshed out lore and factions.

Personally I like a good characterful faction with a suitably indepth back-story to help me with immersion; it makes me feel I have sided with an outlook or ethic and can role-play it accordingly. I could immerse myself in a faction I designed, but for some reason I'd rather have a back-story developed by a writer rather than my own head.

I like designing my own factions certainly, but not at the expense of stock choices.

I kinda agree with this. I like playing as a custom faction in must the same way I like to make a custom sovereign based on my previous DnD characters; but I also like playing -against- the pre-made factions because they are typically more fleshed-out and 'balanced' when compared to player made races/factions. Personaly, I like to be immersed in the lore as I play as I usually like to roleplay rather than min/max my race in order to force a quick victory. I think playing against a race of smurfs or if it ends up like Spore; penismonsters, would break any immersion for me.

I'm sorry but Trogs and Urxen are what exactly?  Since I don't know I sure wouldn't vote for them.  "Men" sound so boring.   Stereotypically middle of the road too.  The factions - Pariden, Tarth, Capitar, etc.  mean what to us?  Those who don't know the background or anything (just here to test a game).   This is my point.  Of course I'm going to choose something I can make, cause I may just make something to suit my mood/playstyle.  

Who's the warlord? Who's the turtle/defender/builder type, etc.  Who's the heavy trader? Who's the research nerd? 

TO me as of now, factions are just hollow names(just like races).  Something to be filled in later.  I wouldn't put any stock in the poll at all.  It's too early.  Of course, E is going to be moddable.  Somebody is always going to mod something.  BUT if you make factions  interesting enough, people are going to have favorites that are standard issue. 

I have created my own races, factions, sovereign to prove that functionality works and did not crash.  I still go back to too early to tell.

You've articulated my sentiments far better than I could.

Frankly, I had a lot of expectations about this game, and this original post is unbelievably disappointing--and probably disingenuous (in trying to pass off short-cuts as giving more options) as well.

I think it is possible that everyone is over-reacting just a bit to the OP.   I know that forum communities tend to grab any little developer tidbit and run with it despite not having all the context or a good understanding of the actual intent of the post.  

In my opinion, we should just calm down and try to suggest options instead of throwing out allegations of Stardock trying to cut all the races.  

The way I read the OP, is that Stardock could focus their efforts in other places instead of making up more unique races.   Instead giving the player more tools to use in creating a race (including art assets I would imagine).   If 8 out of 10 players aren't even going to use the stock races then why dump alot of time into them.  

That said, there should be diversity for the AI.  And I assume that the AI will use the user created races/factions that have been saved (they did in Gal Civ 2).   So you might end up playing against the super magic focused wizard people you created and won with last game.

I too would like to see a lot of differences between races, but I will probably never play a stock race in the game (except if the campaign forces you to be a stock race).   So I would prefer to have time spent making customization even better and if they have time to add more complex multi-race handling.   Even better.

I think one of the reason for prefering our own faction is the lack of charisma of the existing ones. They all look too similar (at least,  human factions). Try to make them more special, more different.

And as someone has stated before, people want to create their own faction, but love to play against elves, orcs, dwarves, and so on, so you should consider to keep the factions you have created, but giving some flavour to them, making them more unique (different visuals, different buildings, etc)

It took me a few reads to get what the OP was getting at - and that is because the tradeoff decision he talks about isn't linked to the poll.

People are not attached to the existing factions.  Because of this, we are taking away stock races.

Huh?  If anything, to me, this means take away stock factions, or add in more races to make the factions more different and memorable.

I am all for custom factions.  I like the idea of having my own Kingdom be mine.  BUT unless I can mess with the appearance of my race to no end, and have a lot of different options for a race editor, I'm going to ignore it.  I would much rather have people mod in their own races then be able to do a slipshod job of it on my own.

We are trying to create a living world, but because we are not basing it on a world we already know - even if its stock fantasy, we have no attachment to any part of it going in.  I'm rather worried that I'm going to get into a match and just reference my AI opponents by their color, and not be able to tell the difference between two of them.

"However, with the reality being that people seem to much prefer to create their own factions, it may make sense for us to return to TWO pre-made races (Men and Fallen) and then use the resources saved to put in more content to let people make their own races."

As far as I'm concerned, I am discontent and cautious and I don't represent the other posters here, but they seem rather discontent and cautious. He clearly stated in other words, he's seriously considering that our interest in customizing our own factions means we don't necessarily care for the current lore ones. As others have stated the feelings in my sub-conscious, this Journal is suggesting a large reversal on their part.

If 8 out of 10 players aren't going to the use stock races, doesn't mean (and doesn't matter) if they aren't going to play them, but rather, they're going to have nothing to play against! Think about what you said! I never, ever played any of the stock races in Galactic Civilization 2 and I don't remember a single video game requiring me to design custom stock races to play against. . .

I'm down for implementing new game mechanics to flesh out our own factions and the lore ones, although, it's already in the beta, but I'm myself surprised. I thought between publishing Elemental's own novel of sorts and this long length of time passed, the idea of removing the other Fallen races to be an impossible notion.

I want them to keep the current factions, keep the current races and flesh them out.

The problem here is, we haven't even accessed the Empire factions yet and whether or not you implemented the other two Fallen races, haven't presented any unique characteristics concerning them. Therefore we are without knowledge to make a public opinion on whether y'all should remove the current lore-oriented races in favor of our own, which I think would be a huge mistake.

Races and factions are something I always thought the Disciples series did the best. Most fantasy strategy games make the mistake of not focusing on the lore part and just throw in a mix of generic fantasy races. MoM did that and AoW:SM did that and neither game had any cool factions that had any kind of story behind them.

I'd love to see three to five fully developed factions that would ooze coolness - with the option of customizing them to some extent. What I would not like to see when playing multiplayer is some blue pimple faced funky race with weird stats that don't make sense. And that will inevitably happen when you give too much power to the player.

Sins of a Solar empire has really cool factions too. I wish Elemental would take this approach as well instead of trying to have too much freedom and falling flat with uninteresting factions that have no lore.

edit: PLEASE NO ELVES OR DWARVES!

I just want to say that this poll doesn't mean anything. The current factions aren't finished - hell, they're not even started - they're an icon with maybe one trivial difference from the other factions. Of course we're going to make our own factions with dozens of strengths and weaknesses to pick from, there's really no other choice. When the default factions (and races) are more complete and distinguishable I expect this to change - of course I fully support the idea of custom races, but don't skimp on the default races and factions, because people will actually use them once there are real differences between them and the choice has some meaning.

Whatever will give people the most flexibility without requiring modding skills. I would like to get into the modding, but am also a little leery about my success.

I definitely think the idea of having mixed race armies is a plus, but the fact that units are designed mitigates that somewhat. Yes I understand that having the army with Elven archers with a racial bonus on archery, etc etc does add some cool flavor, I also think that having some truly unique units per race would enhance this. Or perhaps there will be unique units based on unique racial techs....nm I am almost sure that is the direction you are heading with this. If so, great! (If not, why not? lol)

I hope at the very least that some 3D models for other races are either available in the canon or easily importable from mods. I realize there are likely to be problems displaying different armor and weapons equipped on lots of different races - I could live with that, The current plan to have only men and fallen as races - there are things about it I don't like, but I think being able to create mixed armies outweighs any of my concerns. Expansion packs and modders will flesh out the race options I am sure...overall - I like the direction. (at least in theory, we'll see how I like it in practice!)