Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Psychoanalysis on the web..
Published on January 30, 2005 By Draginol In Business

Empathy is a strange thing. Someone with empathy can read in a lot from someone from what they write on an IRC channel.  But someone short in empathy can meet someone, read what they write, and still not have any idea what makes that person tick. Learning you lack empathy is an important first step to trying to develop it.  I know because for most of my life, I lacked empathy.

Developing empathy is critical to success in business. It's absolutely critical in managing a company and it's important in marketing and sales.  In managing people, trying to learn what motivates them is important. In the last month or two, we've started even giving our people personality tests. Kind of a empathy cheat sheet in order to better meet their needs. But no test can substitute for empathy. It is something I've worked on for the past few years to get better at.

One way to determine whether you're strong in the empathy department is being have to meet someone or read what they've written and get a "rough" idea of what makes them tick. On another thread, a user came on and grossly misjudged what type of person I am.

He argued I was a particular personality profile called INTJ. He said that the following description probably "fits me to a letter".

loner, more interested in intellectual pursuits than relationships or family, not very altruistic, not very complimentary, would rather be friendless than jobless, observer, values solitude, perfectionist, detached, private, not much fun, hidden, skeptical, does not like most people, socially uncomfortable, not physically affectionate, unhappy, does not talk about feelings, hard to impress, analytical, likes esoteric things, pessimistic, not spontaneous, discontented, guarded, does not think they are weird but others do, responsible, insensitive to the misfortunes of others, orderly, clean, organized, familiar with darkside, does not value organized religion, suspicious of others, lonely, rarely shows anger, punctual, finisher, prepared

Favored Careers
scientist, dictator, forensic anthropologist, systems analyst, philosopher, nuclear engineer, political analyst, researcher, statistician, scholar, research scientist, computer scientist, software designer, curator, computer programmer, aerospace engineer, electrical engineer, paleontologist, english professor, philosophy professor, chemical engineer, epidemiologist, forensic scientist, museum curator, research assistant, mechanic, astronomer, figher pilot, librarian, systems administrator, neurosurgeon, book editor, biotechnology, archeologist, lab tech, bookstore owner

Now, before I tell you what I actually came up with on said personality test, how many people, even if you've not met me, but have been around me in the "virtual" sense for some time would agree that the above description fits me? I suspect not many.

I don't have infinite faith in personality profiles. But I do find them to be pretty accurate. Here is the profile I matched after taking the test: ENTJ:

decisive, fearless, planner, thrill seeker, engaged, social, comfortable around others, image conscious, likes to be center of attention, adventurous, outgoing, emotionally stable, leader, ambitious, hard working, dominant, prepared, hates to be bored, confident, opinionated, analytical, prepares for worst case scenarios, organized, orderly, clean, driven, resourceful, finishes most things they start, achieving, risk taker, desires fame/acclaim, image focused, perfectionist, driven

Favored careers:

marketing specialist, government employee, lawyer, developer, political scientist, bounty hunter, international relations specialist, software designer, systems analyst, business manager, entertainment lawyer, foreign service officer, strategist, project manager, advertising executive, cia agent, marketing manager, geneticist, private investigator, administrator, business analyst, politician, management consultant, producer, financial advisor, entrepreneur, genetics researcher, cardiologist, professor, fbi agent

This is what the test came up with after I took it.  But does any of this really come as a shock? Favored careers: Developer, Political Scientist, Software Designer, Business Manager, Marketing Manager, Entrepreneur.  A little bit better than "Philosophy Professor"? Or "Museum Curator"?

I am not arguing that one profile is better than another -- just that one matches my personality dramatically closer.   The thought provoking part is how someone could be so certain of their personality profile guess of me and yet be so completely wrong? That's a problematic combination - missing social empathy with dogged certainty. 

Even without the benefit of strong empathy, if someone wanted to get an idea of what kind of person I am (or am not) my articles make some things clear -- I'm married. I have kids. I like having kids. I like being around people. I like interacting with people. I'm not very private (I run a freaking blog site for crying out loud). So how someone, even without meeting me, could possibly conclude that I'm the "INTJ" profile is astounding.

Empathy is an important trait. If you observe other people and try to understand their motivations, their concerns, and their goals it does make it easier to be successful in interacting with them.  My own track record in that area is spotty. Being an eNTj profile has its downsides.  As a business skill, especially in medium to large companies (or in sales and marketing) empathy is very crucial to success. 

So if you find yourself not having a lot of empathy, work on it.  Next to personal self-discipline, empathy is the most important element for career success.


Comments
on Jan 31, 2005

i saw your article and the comment to which you refer. i followed the link and read the profile the commentor felt appropriate to you and--mostly because i didnt recognize anything there that seemed to correspond to what little ive come to 'know' about you through your writing--took the test myself (altho i wasnt sufficiently interested to pay for discovering what type of 'rational' i am).   the profile produced by your test provides (duh) a more accurate assessment, based--once again--on my observations.

the best of these tests i've found (and i can't recall the name of the software nor the company who created it) was only available for macs at the time i came across it.  i subjected a number of people i knew fairly well to the process; after sharing the analyses, all involved agreed the results were so revealing it was almost scary (especially considering this was the free demo version)

one thing struck me about your explanation of empathy.  i've never seen empathy described nor heard of its utilization as a business 'tool'.  it seems to me empathy is ability to share another's feeling or emotional state without sharing the same specific experience to which theyre responding.   i soopled the word and what i found seems to agree with my understanding of the term link   

possibly i'm misreading or misunderstanding your explanation?

on Jan 31, 2005
i think you need to take more time to find your true type. i am an insanely active blogger... yet i do not consider myself an ENTJ as opposed to my seemingly preferred INTJ type just because of this. true, you seem to be unhealthily attached to a concept which you consider to present the best business future to you, as most high ranking executives are this type or ESTJ simply because of their unrelenting attitude to win at all costs. tests are at most 70% accurate... and i think the fact that you only wanted to do one test to prove it to yourself means you don't really want to confirm it by studying the deeper characteristics of the system. afterall... the ENTJ is just the INTJ with its major functions reversed to form a different general perspective on life
on Jan 31, 2005

Empathy is the process of being able to empathize with others -- understand them.  Be able to see things from their perspective. It is very important in business. Most management books I've read really stress that point as well.

"Pete", one can quibble about the other elements of personality but being extroverted or introverted are polar opposites.  As a friend of mine who read the other article put it, "The extrovert part of the guess should have been a gimme to anyone who remotely knows you."  There's nothing wrong with being an introvert. I have friends who are introverted. But I'm about the least introverted person I know.

Moreover, I was given a link to a personality test, I took it. It said ENTJ. What more do you want? I wasn't going out of my way here, many long time JUers take such tests. I've taken many other personality tests over the years.  There's nothing superior about one profile over another.

on Jan 31, 2005
Why do you lend any creedence to that Idiot anyways, you know who you are.. and having that unnamed moron come in and give his instant take on who and what you are is ludicrous...
on Jan 31, 2005
Strange how many folks will assume they know you personally from reading 2 articles out of 2 or 3 hundred on here isn't it?
on Jan 31, 2005
"one can quibble about the other elements of personality but being extroverted or introverted are polar opposites."

FWIW, this is not entirely accurate when dealing with Myers-Briggs results, at least not in a mutually exclusive sense. The best way to type intraversion vs. extraversion in that context is in how interacting with lots of people affects you. An 'I' might be able to interact with others at a party and come off as being an extrovert (in the conventional sense), but they will usually require a serious recharge period (some 'alone time', if you will), whereas an 'E' will actually feel more energised. IOW, it's not that one is only one type or the other, but rather that one is more 'the default'.
on Jan 31, 2005

Hehe...Introvert..that's some funny stuff. 

 

on Jan 31, 2005
"Psychoanalysis on the web.."

Psychology is not a science.

All science is eirther Physics or Stamp Collecting.

However I do empathize with you. HaHa
on Feb 01, 2005
Lol. Touche!