Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
The story of the garden
Published on March 4, 2007 By Draginol In Politics

Once upon a time...

There was a man with a garden. He worked very hard tending his garden and produced far more vegetables than he would ever be able to eat. So he gave some of his vegetables away to up and coming gardeners who used the seeds to start their own gardens in exchange for the gardener getting a tiny percent of the profits they generated.

But then one day, the king decided socialism was a more "humane" way of doing things. He forced all the gardeners to give him all the extra vegetables they made to give out to the "poor".

Because of this, the gardener didn't have any extra vegetables to provide to up and coming gardeners to get them started.

In short order, the number of new gardeners came to a stand still while the population continued to grow even higher since, for now, there was a lot of free food thanks to the socialist king.

But soon after, people began to starve because there was no longer enough food to feed the growing population. The king couldn't understand why and decided he should take more and more food from the "Greedy" gardeners. But the problem only got worse as now no gardeners had enough vegetables to use to plant more crops in their own gardens for next year.

The moral of the story is that it's never a good idea for the government to confiscate from those who are producing things to give to those who are not producing - especially if it interferes with the ability for the producers to produce even more. Because in the end, all the people will suffer as a result.

 


Comments (Page 7)
9 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9 
on Mar 14, 2007
That's the unit we have, it is about 3 feet tall (which you can't see in the picture). We use that at the inlet for the home so every tap in the house has filtered water. For drinking/baby formula/cooking we have a reverse osmosis system in the kitchen.


Again with the money. How many people could afford that unit let alone afford the plumber to put it in or the replacement cartridges? Or for that matter the reverse osmosis system Then tack on the price (again) for plumber to install "and" for replacement cartridges And an FYI....all that first one is, is a "carbon filter" which LW suggested ealier. But I didn't hear you say anything positive about her idea then.

What was said earlier was dead on. You're nothing but a stuck up snob.
on Mar 14, 2007
And just an FYI....using quotation marks for emphsis is what I was taught in school.


I find the quotes MUCH less annoying than the CAPS, plus using CAPS would bring you TOO close to the COL's posts. Especially WHEN they show UP in seemingly random SPOTS.
on Mar 14, 2007
I find the quotes MUCH less annoying than the CAPS, plus using CAPS would bring you TOO close to the COL's posts. Especially WHEN they show UP in seemingly random SPOTS.


Gee! You just summerized Col's last 100 articles in one sentence.
on Mar 14, 2007
I find the quotes MUCH less annoying than the CAPS, plus using CAPS would bring you TOO close to the COL's posts. Especially WHEN they show UP in seemingly random SPOTS.


Bold! Friend to the friendless!

Italic! Lover of the loveless!

These both look better and more effective and less sarcastic than "quotes", and less yelly than CAPS.
on Mar 14, 2007
I'm not suggesting you drink bleach. I consider the drinking water from my tap safe unless told otherwise by public officials. As for Cl content, the concentrations used, are used to kill bacteria, and if they were used in such high levels as to harm mammals, then I would be concerned, yet they are not.

I have kept tropical fish, which are perhaps hundreds of times as sensitive to Cl levels in water as people are. In the summer, which is when Cl levels are highest, they can become slightly twitchy when you add new water, if untreated, because they are intimately confined in their water environment. However the CL evaporates from the water very quickly if allowed to sit, or stir, and someone had mentioned that freezing and then allowing their water to thaw and then re-freezing it, will eliminate the taste.

The Cl evaporates during the thawing process or in any standing, faster then water, because it is a gas at room temperature. Anyway to remove heavy metals though you have to filter your water. That is the only case in which I would purchase bottled water in order to assure its safety. Living in a city though I think the danger level is much lower then assumed by the blogging and online community.

No longer do we suffer from malaria, dysentery, cholera, or any other major medical disease from contaminated water. Today your worst risk of bacterial infection is cryptosproidium or ecoli. Ecoli is more likely to kill you from uncooked meat products then your water.

I guess if this place were a tad more welcoming to people who weren't assholes on the much, then the resident water treatment guy or gal who used to post here, would be better able to post some rebuttals and clear up some misinformation about making water safe to drink.
on Mar 14, 2007
I consider the drinking water from my tap safe unless told otherwise by public officials.


Right. The government NEVER lies to us!

Here's a tip, Dan: when you can SMELL the chlorine, there's probably too much in the water supply.

In our community it is quite probable they are using the chlorine to cover some nasties. They are consistently in violation of testing regulations that are required of municipalities, and it will not be long before someone holds their feet to the fire.

Some of the older people in the community are suffering the same sets of suspect systems, and their doctors are advising them that they believe a parasite to be responsible. These doctors have been telling their patients to boil the water, even though the city has not issued such an advisory. Now who am I going to trust: a doctor, who is seeing a pattern of symptoms consistent with parasites, or a municipal government that's not testing the water supply? Seems a no brainer here.

I do realize you know everything, Dan, and I wouldn't DARE cross the omniscient Dan Greene. After all, your name does show up among the preeminent scientists in every field, right?
on Mar 15, 2007
"I do realize you know everything, Dan, and I wouldn't DARE cross the omniscient Dan Greene. After all, your name does show up among the preeminent scientists in every field, right?"

Trolling.

"Now who am I going to trust: a doctor, who is seeing a pattern of symptoms consistent with parasites, or a municipal government that's not testing the water supply? Seems a no brainer here."

Trolling.

I don't live in a dump Gid, but I do live in an area where the tap water comes from a super fund river site. As for how you view your potable water supply, I expect someone like you to not be concerned about what the water contains at all in lieu of health risks, but then I am surprised daily.
on Mar 15, 2007
Again with the money. How many people could afford that unit let alone afford the plumber to put it in or the replacement cartridges? Or for that matter the reverse osmosis system Then tack on the price (again) for plumber to install "and" for replacement cartridges And an FYI....all that first one is, is a "carbon filter" which LW suggested ealier. But I didn't hear you say anything positive about her idea then.


$150 plus a few bucks for a handyman isn't much. RO units can run as low as $99, and anyone with a screwdriver and drill can install one of those. Cartridges aren't much, $100 a year for both combined. LW suggested a basic carbon filter, which is very different from the one I mention. The one we use is a .2 micro 2 stage high density straged-carbon that removes vastly more than a basic brita-style carbon filter. Over the long term, Brita's will cost substantially more than an installed filtration system and Brita won't do anything about the chlorine coming from your shower. Which I might add has some substantial long term cumulative health implications.

What was said earlier was dead on. You're nothing but a stuck up snob.

No, I just know a *LOT* about water.

I'm not suggesting you drink bleach. I consider the drinking water from my tap safe unless told otherwise by public officials.

Yes, like how rushed out and told you smoking was harmful - 55 years too late. Or how they discovered Vioxx killed up to 150,000 people - about 10 years too late, etc. Bottom line is, there are much safer methods of water treatment than Chlorine(and subseqent forms of it), but the Chemical Lobby is powerful, and Chlorine is the cheapest method. What few people realize is that while Chlorine itself is toxic, the VOC's that arrive at your tap as a byproduct of Chlorine interacting with organic compounds are very carcinogenic.

No longer do we suffer from malaria, dysentery, cholera, or any other major medical disease from contaminated water.

No but we have heart disease, kidney disease, increasing cancer rates, fluorsis, degenerative bone diseases, and other issues as a direct result of water treatment. Lets not forget Chlorine does little to remove Giardia Cysts and Cryptosporidium, which can be in contents of close to 1%-3% in many municipalities. (which cause symptoms Gideon mentions above) Both of which cause stomach ailments and worse. Nobody in this household has had Diarrhea - ever, yet I constantly here of people we know that drink tap water that have stomach ailments or diarrhea. (seems like monthly) I'd guess a direct result from cysts, parasites, and VOC contaminents in tap water.

Bottom line, read your local municipality water quality reports, make your own informed decision not based on the "Perception" the water is safe, but based on facts. The government cannot acknowledge openly that the water isn't good for you because there would be a huge public furor over it. Quietly they elbow each other and wink, and whisper about how shitty their water is while posting glowing reports about how good our water is to you joepublic. If you choose to believe this without examining the evidence yourself, then there is little anyone can do to convince you otherwise.




on Mar 20, 2007
"No but we have heart disease, kidney disease, increasing cancer rates, fluorsis, degenerative bone diseases, and other issues as a direct result of water treatment."

Life expectancies climbing every year, inspite of this awful city water lol.

"The government cannot acknowledge openly that the water isn't good for you because there would be a huge public furor over it."

That's because that would be bullshit. But if you aren't buying premium then you aren't living right? Right?

"If you choose to believe this without examining the evidence yourself, then there is little anyone can do to convince you otherwise."

I'm only a D chemistry student and while I agree Cl is dangerous, toxic in fact, so is water, but only in high concentrations, and the same goes for Cl, although the CL is dangerous at much lower concentrations then water can be. The problem with consuming too much water is that it can drop your sodium/salt levels to dangerous levels, its why they hydrate people slowly who are de-hydrated.

I'll stand by my statement that anything is dangerous/toxic/can kill you, in the right concentrations and situations. As for processed city water, we've been drinking it for dozens of years, and water processed in one way or another since BC times, and yet life expectancies and medical advances extending life continue to keep us around longer. If city water was so bad for you, i.e. causing cancer which I think is almost total bullshit, then the city/county government would ask you to not drink water for their tap.

I drink soda mostly anyway, which has a ph closer to battery acid then tap water, so I guess I'm going to die.

Ha.
on Mar 21, 2007
If you are going to use ignorance as your evidentiary technique then by all means, have at it. But don't for a minute think you can cloud the judgement of people around you into following that ridiculous thought pattern. I've offered a wealth of evidence to support my claims, you offer only conjecture and anecdotal nonsense. Next time try a bit harder to substantiate your argument if you want to keep any shred of credibility.

I will leave you with one final publication that you'll find impossible to refute, andI hope others will take at least a cursory read of;

http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/findings.php

if you want to search for your particular state, and all data pertaining to that water, feel free to check here;

http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/statereports/

I think you'll be surprised to find just how toxic your local tap water is.
on Mar 21, 2007
I'm sure you can find evidence that says anything. On here, and only on here, I've encountered people who will tell you there are/were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, that the sun is the cause of global warming, that there is a correlation between piracy and global warming too right? Lol. "Evidentiary technique", I'm not familiar, does that term mean, coming up with BS?

I'm sure there are plenty of places where water is less safe to drink then others, my community isn't one of them. I don't consume enough tap water though in the course of a year to be worried. But thanks for your genuine concern regarding what I drink.
on Mar 21, 2007
Next time try a bit harder to substantiate your argument if you want to keep any shred of credibility.


Credibility? And just how did mankind survive so long without all the special stuff that you seem so bent on touting?
on Mar 21, 2007
Next time try a bit harder to substantiate your argument if you want to keep any shred of credibility.


Credibility? And just how did mankind survive so long without all the special stuff that you seem so bent on touting?
on Mar 21, 2007
"The government says it's good for you; it must be"

People like Dan are why we do not see political progress in this country. If the government says it it must be true, because the government would never, ever lie to us.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: why do some people believe that people, who can't be trusted as individuals, suddenly inherit a mantle of nobility and inerrancy once they are elected to office, despite all evidence to the contrary? You'd think freezers full of cash and admissions that we used incendiary devices at Waco would eventually have them asking questions, but they'll follow their government right into the abyss if need be, and castigate those who don't march in lock step.
on Mar 22, 2007
Next time try a bit harder to substantiate your argument if you want to keep any shred of credibility.


Credibility? And just how did mankind survive so long without all the special stuff that you seem so bent on touting?


All of which tells you what? That all the stuff "you" claim are necessary...mankind has done just fine surviving without all that stuff. I'd like to see you try and blame my having MS is due to "bad" drinking water or not eating all organic foods versus processed foods.
9 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9