Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
Published on September 8, 2008 By Draginol In Republican

I don't like McCain. I make no bones about it. I am not inclined to vote for him and I still don't plan to.

But this article at RightWingNews really does speak for me pretty well.

 

However, the real problem with Obama isn't just that he's incompetent, it's that he's an incompetent who seems to think he's a genius. Never has a man so unaccomplished been so overly proud of his non-achievements.

Compare him to say, Jimmy Carter, who was far too naive to be President and did such a poor job that he could fairly be considered the least capable man to hold that job in the last century. Carter, for all his naivete, had served in the military, run a business, and been Governor of a state. On the other hand, Obama shares Carter's liberalism and naivete, but doesn't have his experience, and is arrogant enough to believe it doesn't matter.

For that matter, compare Barack Obama to a liberal who is, let's say, a middle manager at Circuit City or IBM. Who would you rather have as President -- Obama or that random manager? I'd take the random manager because at least that person would probably be humble enough to realize how much he doesn't know about America's most important job -- and that is what we're talking about, folks.

Exactly.  Obama isn't merely unqualified for President, he's incredibly unqualified. He's 40 some years old and what exactly has he done? What has he done in his life other than seek ever higher office? He's simply a guy who is good at reading speeches off a tele-prompter.

That being said, it may have been Barack's inability to do the job that had me rethinking my non-vote for McCain, but it has been the left's treatment of Sarah Palin that put me over the top.

Granted, "Politics ain't beanbag" and everybody with half a brain knows the mainstream media is in the tank for Obama, so it's no surprise that Sarah Palin hasn't been treated fairly by the press.

However, the rumors, lies, and attacks on Sarah Palin's family, many of which have been spread by the mainstream media, have been absolutely despicable.

Precisely.  This is a lot like 2004 where I wasn't terribly enthused for Bush. Bush is about as unlike me as you can get. I'd probably get along better with Kerry than Bush (not that I'd want to hang out with either one). But the left's behavior was so disgusting leading up to the election that I simply didn't want "those people" to have any more power than they have.

Read the whole thing:

http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/09/why_i_am_now_supporting_john_m.php


Comments (Page 5)
9 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last
on Sep 17, 2008

I have to say the shifting of the goal posts is quite amazing.  "so what if he got into college?  So what if he got into harvard?  Uh, i mean, so what if he got in to Harvard Law School a top one in the US?  So what if he graduated magna from said top law school? (and something about crapping pants)  

It never ceases to amuse me how moonbats slobber over what college someone went to as if going to college is an accomplishment on its own.

I guess that's why the moonbats are relegated to working for the government or low level jobs bitching and moaning about the people who actually run the country.

on Sep 17, 2008

I finally understand the dismissal of the a top degree at a top law school though.  You fail to realized that for everyone one of you, 9 other people who are smarter, work harder, and are better fitted to the job had their startup companies crash and burn with their remains scattered around places like the Denver tech corridor, Boston's 128, silicon valley--all due to any number of things outside their control.  Don't forget the luck the goes hand in hand with the hard work and preparedness.   Your success does not diminish the value or difficulty of other people getting advanced degrees.  Sorry if i'm underwhelmed but it sounds like you just happened to get lucky (that facebook guy would probably pee even further than you -- he must be way more qualified, right?).  

Ah, the ultimate moonbat response: Your success is just luck.  Personal failure isn't your fault. It's not in your control. It's society's fault. 

In the moonbat universe, success, actual tangible success doesn't really matter. It's what college you graduated from.  Didn't Bush go to Yale? He's been such a great President I guess...

on Sep 17, 2008

You make it seem like only imbeciles work for Circuit City.  Most patent offices only requires you to have a 4 year degree.  Let me see here: some 'imbecile' who was just AN ASSISTANT EXAMINER revolutionized the world of Physics. Yes, I know that Circuit City and Patent Clerks are two different things.

Uh, are you picking a specific patent clerk, or were you picking a RANDOM patent clerk?  If you check out the statement in the OP, it says a random circuit city manager is more qualified then Obama.  You can always find deviations in any random sample, but cherry picking them after the fact isn't very illustrative nor is it random.

Are you telling me that when you screen the people you are going to interview you pick random people or do you actually use criteria?

Is it surprising that a lot of politicans that run for president have gone to an IVY League school?  If this is a qualification to be pres then I guess I am sort of qualified to be pres.

I don't think it matters if it is IVY League or not.  What is revealing is going to a top rated school in any difficult field and graduating magna among a population of smart students.  The expected value in that sample of people is very much different then a random sample of circuit city managers. Do you disagree?

But i think we are getting off track from the statement regarding very minimum qualifications.  I have trouble believing that anyone really believes that OP statement isn't absurd by this point.  You bring up some good points, but they aren't really being argued against.

You don't have to like either party's candidates, but hopefully you would want to improve the political dialog in this country behond hyperbole that doesn't stand up under careful observation.

on Sep 17, 2008

Yes, that is the definition of the role of a US Senator.  Overall I'm just thrilled that even conservatives are now starting to become concerned about the division of power between the different branches of government, and are making distinctions about the different roles of Legislature and Executive.  I take it that the "unitary executive" theory is no longer in vogue?

Whoo hoo. I just love it when the moonbats true colors come out. Now conservatives are dumb and authoritarian. After all, if they were smart, they'd be liberals.

Sure, the liberals are the ones who want the government to take over as much as possible but all it takes to hide that reality is a "clever" quip.

on Sep 17, 2008

Muckerberg


You make it seem like only imbeciles work for Circuit City.  Most
patent offices only requires you to have a 4 year degree.  Let me see
here: some 'imbecile' who was just AN ASSISTANT EXAMINER revolutionized
the world of Physics. Yes, I know that Circuit City and Patent Clerks
are two different things.
Uh, are you picking a specific patent clerk, or were you picking a RANDOM patent clerk?  If you check out the statement in the OP, it says a random circuit city manager is more qualified then Obama.  You can always find deviations in any random sample, but cherry picking them after the fact isn't very illustrative nor is it random.
Are you telling me that when you screen the people you are going to interview you pick random people or do you actually use criteria?
Is it surprising that a lot of politicans that run for president have
gone to an IVY League school?  If this is a qualification to be pres
then I guess I am sort of qualified to be pres.
I don't think it matters if it is IVY League or not.  What is revealing is going to a top rated school in any difficult field and graduating magna among a population of smart students.  The expected value in that sample of people is very much different then a random sample of circuit city managers. Do you disagree?
But i think we are getting off track from the statement regarding very minimum qualifications.  I have trouble believing that anyone really believes that OP statement isn't absurd by this point.  You bring up some good points, but they aren't really being argued against.
You don't have to like either party's candidates, but hopefully you would want to improve the political dialog in this country behond hyperbole that doesn't stand up under careful observation.

So are you saying that Bush must be extremely smart too? For the last 8 years, the moonbats have been screaming how stupid Bush is.  Where did Bush get his masters from again? That's right: Harvard.

on Sep 17, 2008

Ah, the ultimate moonbat response: Your success is just luck.  Personal failure isn't your fault. It's not in your control. It's society's fault.

Awww, how cute.  You actually think i was blaming society.  Can you quote me where i said success is just luck?  You are such a clever, clever boy.  My word, you are very clever.  Misrepresent, build up as rediculous strawman, knock down.  So very clever.

Don't forget the luck the goes hand in hand with the hard work and preparedness.

No need to respond the post before that one, because that one is just as clever.

on Sep 17, 2008

If anything that a person does while obtaining a university or graduate degree is not an accomplishment, then how about getting accepted as a lecturer of constitutional law at the University of Chicago, and teaching there for 12 years? Does that count?

If you want to be a teacher - go for it.  If you want to be a doer - I guess not, right?

If so, then surely a seat in the US Senate is an accomplishment?

Of what?  How to get elected?  You are confusing learning with accomplishments, elections with accomplishments.  No, you accomplish and then use that on your resume to further your career.  You do not list as an accomplishment "I got a job".  That is the question you are asking.  And the answer is of course no.  If available, look at a real resume.  They list JObs and education, AND accomplishments.  But jobs and education are not accomplishments.  They are work history. (or education history).  BIG difference.

How exactly is Obama "showing he did not learn anything"?

Do we really need to reprint his gaffs AGAIN?  If you are going to hold him up as a scholar, then they are no longer malaproprisms (sp), but raise serious questions on his competency and if he really did learn anything in College - or is just another quota kid.

on Sep 17, 2008

FYI, it was NASCAR's own recommendation to people to properly inflate their tires that prompted Obama's comment about proper tire inflation. The fact that the right-wing media ran with it is a whole 'nother story.

Indeed!  It showed a simplistic response to a very complicated issue.  Not something you want from the leader of the nation.  But then Obama does not know how to lead, at least he has shown that much so far.

 

on Sep 17, 2008

What about all those pastors who preached that the End of Days Is Nigh! if John Kerry got elected?

What about the left who said that God sent Gustav to teach the republicans a lesson?

on Sep 17, 2008

I mean what does someone have to do to be considered better than a circuit city middle manager? (work for Haliburton?)

No, just produce something positive - in a quatifiable way.

You know like actually EARN an income, not just vote yourself one?

on Sep 17, 2008

If you want to be a teacher - go for it.  If you want to be a doer - I guess not, right?

Did you really just equate teaching as not doing anything?  Wow.

No, just produce something positive - in a quatifiable way.

And teaching doesn't produce anything positive (neither does it earn an income all of a sudden).  double wow.

if he really did learn anything in College - or is just another quota kid.

And the trifecta.  Do you really want to go there? Really?  He beat out 80% of Harvard Law's graduating class--at this point you are just being racist.  (Not knowing his class rank is one thing, but bringing it up now in spite of evidence?  and i say that as a caucasian)

on Sep 17, 2008

Did you really just equate teaching as not doing anything? Wow.

No, but if you want to read it that way, that is your choice. 

But I will leave you with this - if "teachers" (and in this case and the previous ones I was referring to COllege Professors although I did not state that - my ommission) aer so smart, why are they not billionaires?  After all tehy "teach us" about the stock market (and other things)

And teaching doesn't produce anything positive (neither does it earn an income all of a sudden). double wow.

You like to put words into people's mouths.  Wont work here skippy.  Now you want to show me all the Government teachers that made great presidents?  or just continue your ventriloquist act?

And the trifecta. Do you really want to go there? Really? He beat out 80% of Harvard Law's graduating class--at this point you are just being racist. (Not knowing his class rank is one thing, but bringing it up now in spite of evidence? and i say that as a caucasian)

Apparently you do. I did not say he was, now did I?  I merely put down a possibility.  It may surprise you to know that the most successful (fill in the blanks) people are not all from Harvard.  So that means that a lot of successful people never went there.  But I guess that means nothing to you either as you have already decided on your own bigotry.  More power to you.

But all this has nothing to do with the point.  I would suggest you take a course in resume writing.  You will see that there is a section for past jobs, education, and *SHOCK* ACCOMPLISHMENTS! 

And do you know why?  Because they are different.  But dont let that stop you from your cross burning and lynching. 

on Sep 17, 2008

I finally understand the dismissal of the a top degree at a top law school though.  You fail to realized that for everyone one of you, 9 other people who are smarter, work harder, and are better fitted to the job had their startup companies crash and burn with their remains scattered around places like the Denver tech corridor, Boston's 128, silicon valley--all due to any number of things outside their control.  Don't forget the luck the goes hand in hand with the hard work and preparedness.   Your success does not diminish the value or difficulty of other people getting advanced degrees.  Sorry if i'm underwhelmed but it sounds like you just happened to get lucky (that facebook guy would probably pee even further than you -- he must be way more qualified, right?).  

I can't comment as to whether 9 out of 10 people are "smarter" than I am.  But as someone who has run a business for 15 years and experienced more than my share of challenges, I don't think luck has been a major contributor to our company's success.

Luck can help someone be in the right place at the right time. But it won't sustain a business for the long term.

I also don't consider raw intelligence as being a qualification on its own. There are lots of real smart people out there who make awful executives.  

Obama is running for President of the United States and when listing his "accomplishments" you guys are going all the way back to his college days -- jobs he's had and degres he's earned.  But what specifically has he accomplished?

For example, with McCain, he was the one who led the campaign finance reform movement. Now, I disagree with it which is one of the reasons I won't vote for McCain but it is still an accomplishment. It demonstrates he has the capacity to build a consensus and see his vision to fruition.

Obama, by contrast, has nothing like that.  

on Sep 17, 2008

Yes, that is the definition of the role of a US Senator.  Overall I'm just thrilled that even conservatives are now starting to become concerned about the division of power between the different branches of government, and are making distinctions about the different roles of Legislature and Executive.  I take it that the "unitary executive" theory is no longer in vogue?

That's a pretty inflammatory statement to make. You keep talking about civility and then you inject your responses with stuff like this.

Besides, I'm not the one arguing that being a Senator makes him automatically qualified to be President - you are.  

I know that he is about 10 years older than you and has spent most of his life in the areas of law or governance, whereas you have been a programmer and businessman.  I know that you are both bright and hardworking people.  All else being equal, I would assume that someone whose business it is to know the constitution, history, and the law would "school" someone who can only devote part of his attention to it.

By that line of reasoning, a constitutional law professor is more qualified to be President.  

The constitution isn't that complicated.  There are, in my opinion, a lot more important things to being President than being a lawyer. Leadership, judgment, understanding of economics, foreign affairs, history, executive management ability. 

Even if Obama had those things, and he doesn't, I still wouldn't vote for him because I vote first and foremost on ideology. I don't agree with Obama's ideology -- his world view.  I don't think his policies would be good for the country or my family.  

You asked why I would support Palin over Obama. The answer is simple: Ideology. Any govenror of any state of the United States is, IMO, qualified to be President of the United States. Running a state is an executive position.  But ideology is the crucial thing.  I agree with her conservative principles.

on Sep 17, 2008

Facts about universal health care are readily available. Talk to anyone in any country that has universal health care about the bureaucracy that stands between them and life saving surgery.

There certainly are a lot of facts. The capitalistic countries that have universal health care have healthier, longer living populations and spend a smaller % of their gdp on health care. Unfortunately our govt is incapable of doing things in a way to make them beneficial to the public.

9 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last