Brad Wardell's views about technology, politics, religion, world affairs, and all sorts of politically incorrect topics.
My review and experience with it
Published on May 1, 2005 By Draginol In Home Improvement

If you decide you want to finish your basement there are lots of options to consider.  Do you do it yourself? Do you contract it out? Maybe do a little in between? For me and my wife, we just aren't handy enough to try to finish a basement on our own.  So we decided we'd contract the whole thing out.

Once you decide you're going to contract it out, then it's a matter of deciding what direction to take with it. Do you go with drywall? The problem with drywall is that it takes months to put in (how long do you want contractors going in and out of your house?).  It makes a lot of mess (expects months if not years of drywall dust to be floating around your house), it's susceptible to damage from a wide range of sources (water, normal wear and tear due to it being in a basement).  So we wanted our basement finished but drywall had a lot of negatives to it.

That's when we heard about the Owens Corning Basement System.  After intense negotiations, we had it done.  And below you can read about our experiences during the sales process, installation, and after effects.  I hope you find it useful.

The Owens Corning Basement System has been in place now for our basement for about a month now so I've had time to get used to it.

The project went pretty smoothly except for a few hiccups that I'll talk about here. So what's the verdict? Here are the things I really liked about it:

  1. It's fast. In 2 weeks it's all done.
  2. It's clean. No dry wall dust all over.
  3. It's durable. It's virtually impossible to damage. Basements, unlike the rest of the house, are more prone to dings since that's where most people store things too.
  4. It's virtually sound proof. This was an unexpected benefit. But the kids can go and play down there without having to hear music, TV, yelling throughout the house.
  5. It looks pretty nice still (but not as nice as dry wall in my opinion).
  6. It is nice to know that in 20 years it'll look the same as today. Dry wall in basements tend to not look so good. At best you'll have to repaint larger areas. With this, you don't have to.

The big thing for us though was the speed of it. My first basement was done with dry wall and I have no regrets about that. It was nicely done. But it took months to do and over a year for the house to stop having more dust in it than before. The dry wall dust simply gets everywhere.

If you're as unhandy as me, then you likely want contractors to do pretty much all the building. It can be uncomfortable having strangers in your house for months. In contrast, the Owens Corning Basement System was installed in our roughly 1100 to 1200 square foot area in about 2 weeks (closer to 10 days).

In short, I was willing to pay a premium to not have to deal with a summer of construction. The fact that it looks nice and can't be damaged easily was a real bonus. My 3 year old already put that to the test by taking a permanent marker to one of the walls. In a few minutes we were able to wipe it off with some bleach and you can't even tell where it was. Contrast that to having to repaint that area with a dry wall basement. Not to mention all the nicks and gouges that would be there due to moving stuff down there.

That said, here are things that I ran into that I didn't like that you should be aware of:

I really didn't like the sales strategy of their sales people. High pressure combined with little specifics created a lot of headaches during the project.

First off, people who can afford to pay a premium for their basement being done aren't fools. Even so, they used the same tactic on us as they would on some gullible yokel. No offense, but the reason we can afford this stuff is because we have some financial savvy. So don't march into our houses with magazines showing that the "Average" basement costs over $50 per square foot to finish. Because that's nonsense and does more to harm your sale than anything else. Sure, if you're going to have bathrooms and kitchens and tiled areas and wet bars and such it will cost more, but the Owens Corning System doesn't take care of any of that. They just do the "walls", drop down ceiling, electrical, and a few other things. They're not going to build you a bar or tile your floor for you (unless you make a special deal with them). Just for reference, a typical basement done with dry wall with nothing too fancy done shouldn't cost much more than $20 per square foot. Our last dry wall basement cost around $17 per square foot.

The price you should try to get with the Owens Corning Basement System is somewhere between $25 and $35 per square foot. They may balk at $25 but $35 they should certainly take. I paid about $28 per square foot. $30 per square foot would be good. Anything much higher and you're paying too much. Which is why they do the high pressure tactic to get you to sign right there.  To the sales guy's horror, I made him sit there while I had my laptop doing net searches on how much other people have paid. By the way, be aware that most states do have a law that allow you to back out of contracts within 72 hours. So if they did manage to get you to commit for $55 per square foot or something you aren't up the creek.

The second thing I didn't care for was the amount of vagueness to the agreement. Because of the high pressure sales tactics, the sales guy didn't write down a lot of our specific needs on his "agreement" (which was literally just a 1 page form he hand wrote notes on which I was pretty unhappy about). For instance, we said we wanted padded carpet so he suggested Home Depot. Which we did. But they didn't cut the doors so that they would fit on padded carpet so when we put in the carpeting, we had to take off the doors. It took us 3 weeks to get them to make good on this. They argued it wasn't their responsibility to fix the doors. Nonsense. We told them up front that we were going to get padded carpet. For us to fix would have meant bringing in another contractor. They agreed to fix it only after I made it clear that I would ensure that my experiences with the Owens Corning Basement System would show up high on google. It took the guy 30 minutes to fix it once he dropped by. So they made good but it did mar an otherwise fairly seamless experience.

So make sure that you are clear (and document) exactly what they do and what they expect you to do. The Owens Corning contractors don't tend to do as much as regular full service basement contractors. They weren't planning on putting in our phone and cable lines for example but luckily that was written into that agreement.

Thirdly, the only negative I've run into since putting it in is that it is, contrary to what they said, not that easy to hang things up on the walls. Since they're not drywall, you can't just put in a nail and put stuff up. You have to use special clipper thingies. These work nice on light things. But they didn't give us any samples or directions or order forms to get things for putting up heavier items (like a big white board for example). This has been a source of some ire since it's turning out not easy to find these "mending plates" in low quantities. Office Max and Staples don't seem to have them. None of the hardware stores we've looked at have them. I've looked on the net and I can buy them in quantity (like 1000 at a time) but I only need like 5. My suggestion is to insist that they provide you with 100 of the t-pins (small stuff) and 100 mending plates (big stuff) as part of the agreement.

Fourthly, this gets back to the "customers are suckers" sales pitch. The sales guy and his materials really went hard on the mold scare tactic. Mold is definitely something not to blow off. But it should not be your motivating factor to spend a third again as much on a basement. Would you pay $15000 more on your house for a "lightning strike resistant" design? The kinds of houses most people who would put this stuff in are usually newer and on the premium side. The basements, in short, don't get wet very easily. That isn't to say they shouldn't mention mold, but it should be more of a "bonus" feature rather than as the principle selling point.

Now that it's all done, I'm pretty happy with it. I like knowing that I won't have to mess around with painting or touching up the basement in a few years. I do wish it was easier to modify with other things. For instance, I can't just build out a bar from it. But that is no biggie really. The basement does what it was supposed to do. And even better, since I want to have a theatre down there eventually, it's got incredible acoustics. If you have the money and are more interested in having your basement be finished quickly and cleanly rather than having some incredible basement palace created, this is something you should seriously consider.

Completion date: September 2003.

Update: September 2005: I have created a second article for people who want to share their experiences (good and bad) with the Owens Corning Basement System. GO HERE to discuss.

update: 10/2003 - still pretty happy with the basement. thanks for all your emails. if you have any questions, ask them in the comments area or you can email me at bwardell@stardock.com.

update: 5/1/2005 - still happy with how it's turned out. I get a  lot of email on this stuff from people, I don't usually get to answer it. But I will say that we are happy with it still. It absorbs sound. But I maintain that the main reason to get it is that you want to save time. If you don't mind having people working on your basement for 6 to 10 weeks and the drywall dust and other dirt that is inevitable with dry-wall then get the dry-wall.  But for me, having it all over in a week or so was the key and no mess afterwards.


Comments (Page 34)
53 PagesFirst 32 33 34 35 36  Last
on Feb 17, 2005
Hamlin Family Desperate, Needs Help


(Jim Lamparella)
Video: Low : High
2/10/2005 11:00 PM
(Dave McKinley, WROC-TV)

It is a chilling tale, of how all that you have can be lost in the blink of an eye...and how insurance won't help...

Jim Lamparella, his wife Dawn, and their two young children enjoyed what many that live in Upstate New York would call a dream. A waterfront home on the shore of Lake Ontario in Hamlin.

But in February of 2003, the dream turned into a nightmare. While the family was on vacation, a pipe inside their home burst, sending 70,000 gallons of water into their home. In the walls of the house at least two forms of toxic mold, Penicillium and Aspergillus began forming. It is now estimated that within two or three days, the voracious molds spread throughout the entire home. It was quickly condemned and the family was ordered to leave. Homeless, they also had to leave nearly all their possessions behind.

When first contacted about their plight, the Lamparellas declined comment, explaining they didn't want to impact their efforts to make a claim with their insurance carrier.

Now, two years later, they are speaking out for the first time.

The insurance company, which declared their home a total loss, refused to pay, claiming the Lamparella's policy did not cover mold. (An investigation by News 8 Now revealed homeowners policies rarely do, accept in cases where policy holders have taken out special riders, which many insurers do not offer in the first place.)

The Lamparellas hired a lawyer, which eventually recommended they settle for a fraction of what they still owed on their mortgage. But the settlement they received barely covered legal fees, and out of pocket costs the family incurred for hotel rooms and disposal of their possessions which were classified as hazardous waste materials.

"In the end, we basically came away with nothing," explained a dejected Jim Lamparella, who estimates the family's total unrecoverable loss to be about $360,000.00. In addition, the Lamparellas must continue to pay on the mortgage for the home they can no longer live in.

Worst of all, Jim began experiencing chronic illness shortly after the mold outbreak. He was eventually diagnosed as having been poisoned by it. In the two years since, his health has steadily declined. He can no longer work, needs oxygen 24 hours a day, and a special breathing apparatus to keep his mold infected lungs functioning while he sleeps. He takes 16 medications daily, including steroids, which have now triggered diabetes. He is 34.

After an 11 day stay at a Rochester Hospital, he speaks out for the first time in a desperate plea for help.

"I'm not the type who takes handouts, but I don't know what else to do," he said.

Rather than a handout, though, some might view what Jim and his family seek now as a hand up. Friends of the Lamparellas figure the family can no longer qualify for a mortgagee to buy another house,(The Lamparellas currently reside with relatives) but they feel if they can get enough help, the family could build a modest new home where their former residence will soon be demolished.

They are looking for contractors & building supply businesses, to donate labor and materials, or consider letting the family have them at a reduced cost. They hope companies which have or rent equipment might let them borrow it to help them get back on their feet and into a new home.

"Anything anyone could do would be greatly appreciated," said Lamparella, "I'm at my bitter end right now when I don't know what else to turn but to say I need help."

** If you can help this family or even if you have ideas about where they can turn, you may contact Jim Lamparella at the following e-mail address:

jlamparella@aol.com

Related Link:
mailto:jlamparella@aol.com
on Feb 17, 2005
I have been monitring this site for some time, there is tons of information out there.

Large settlements could prompt exodus; Md. ruling sought on exclusions; Cost of repairing home might exceed its value

by Anne Lauren Hens lee : Special To The Sun
November 3, 2002

Maryland homeowners insurance could be reaching a critical juncture on an unlikely issue that might prove the final straw for insurance companies teetering from market woes and the impact of recent legislation.

Added to the familiar house assailants -- asbestos, lead paint and radon -- mold is deemed a new threat, one that thus far has had little consequence for the state's homeowners, but has become a potential catalyst for the entire industry.

Texas and Florida have accounted for most mold-related claims. Recent settlements for those claims have exceeded expectations, with one in Texas for $32 million -- a nightmare for insurers. Some claimants have lost their homes or their health has suffered as a consequence of mold damage.

And the geographical line has begun to shift, with the latest mold casualty in Delaware, where more than 300 residents were displaced recently when mold spores spread throughout their apartment complex in New Castle County.

The threat of prohibitive financial consequences has insurance companies looking for an out, with some claiming the potential cost could be too great for one company to bear.

For homeowners who would have to pay out-of-pocket for major structural repairs, the exclusion could present them with an expense that exceeds a home's value.

Insurance agents, who act as middlemen for insurance companies and homeowners, find themselves caught in between. If the state does not adopt an exclusion, one Maryland insurance agent argued, there will be a greater likelihood of more companies pulling out of Maryland.

The risk of losing more insurers in an unstable market, industry officials warn, could prove detrimental to insurers and to consumers, who could find their premiums rising substantially.

Insurance agencies hope for a balance that would satisfy both sides.

"With the mold litigation that occurred in Texas, among other places, and the large settlements, we can see where the carriers are coming from," said Shelley Arnold, executive vice president of the Independent Insurance Agents of Maryland, a statewide trade association. "On the other hand, we can also see the insurance commissioner's point of view, that nothing has been proven as far as this being a health-related issue. And, if that's the case, there is no reason to exclude it."

"Basically, if you look at a homeowners policy now, it excludes toxic mold, and it excludes mold damage. So, the way it is written now, mold is excluded if it naturally occurs, but if it is mold resulting from water damage, for example, then it is covered," she explained. "They are looking for clarification."

Agents, Arnold said, are hoping that Maryland will adopt a plan similar to Connecticut's, where the Department of Insurance recently assigned a $10,000 sublimit, or a cap, on first-party damage and a $50,000 cap on third-party damage. (A first party is the insured. A third party is not a party to the insurance contract -- not the insurer or the insured.)

"Carriers then would know what their probable maximum loss would be, and insurance would still be providing that type of coverage," Arnold said.

More than 200 property and casualty insurers have filed with the Maryland Insurance Administration to exclude or limit coverage for damage arising from mold or mold-related exposure. In response, Associate Commissioner Robert J. Becker will hold an information hearing in Baltimore at 10 a.m. Thursday to discuss filings that exclude or limit coverage in personal and commercial insurance policies for damage arising out of mold or related exposure.

"The commissioner asked for additional data," said Debbie Rosen McKerrow, director of communications and consumer services for the Maryland Insurance Administration.

"He has gotten some, but still not enough to let him to make the decision that he needs to make," McKerrow said. "That is why he wants to have the hearing on [Thursday], to invite industry people and consumers to lay it out on the table, get it on the record, and then he will have something to work from. If the information doesn't come, then that is going to tell us something also.

"The [associate] commissioner needs to make a decision based on facts. And he doesn't feel comfortable that, so far, he has been shown the kind of information that would allow him to make a decision. And it is an important thing," she added. "Once you allow an insurance company to make an exclusion for something, that's a road that is very difficult to turn back from."

Meanwhile, the industry is wary.

"We just had the credit-scoring bill passed last year that would not allow insurers to use credit-scoring in homeowners; we've had State Farm withdraw; we've had several other carriers withdraw. It's not just the mold issue here," Arnold emphasized.

"A lot of things are causing this market to be volatile right now. ... I believe this could be the straw that breaks the camel's back," she said.

The commission will make its decision after it has reviewed all the requested information and testimony at the hearing Thursday. No date has been set for its ruling.
on Feb 17, 2005
Great stuff I chuckle at all the ignorance. Here is some more, I think from the same site.
Mold Getting a Costly Hold On Homes
Posted by Susan R.

Sunday, 03 October 2004


By Rochelle Sharpe, USA TODAY

When Beverly Hammond discovered black and green mold growing in her hall closet last fall, she wanted her family to evacuate the house immediately.

She suspected the gooey fungus was causing her husband's frequent nosebleeds and her 16-year-old daughter's sudden memory loss. Toxic mold can cause such symptoms, she knew, but she had no idea where her family of four could move.

So, Hammond set up six tents in her backyard in Seabrook, east of Houston. Her family has been living in this encampment for six months. And the first insurance adjuster showed up only six weeks ago, Hammond says. She fears it will take months before her house problems are resolved.

"The whole game of insurance is not to pay," she says.

Like thousands of other distraught homeowners, she feels betrayed by the insurance company she had paid to help in a catastrophe.

All over the nation, the American dream of homeownership is being hampered as insurance companies become inundated with costly mold claims stemming from water damage.

In Texas alone, the top five insurance carriers saw their mold claims quintuple in a year.

The carriers paid more than $1 billion on mold settlements the past two years, according to the Texas Department of Insurance.

Texas and California have had the highest number of claims for mold. As a result, many people there are finding it nearly impossible to get insurance when trying to buy a house.

Toxic mold is not the dark scum often found around the bathtub. Instead, it can grow unseen behind walls and on wood as a result of a water leak. Some scientists link respiratory problems, rashes, infections and possibly even brain damage to toxic mold.

"People don't believe mold hurts you, but it really is something that causes harm to the body," says Diane Ashley, an elementary school principal in Katy, west of Houston, who spent months figuring out why she was sick. Her school was closed because of mold.

The insurance bind

Insurance companies say they have no choice but to restrict coverage and raise rates of homeowner policies.

In Texas, real estate agents warn buyers to start shopping for homowners insurance as soon as they sign a contract to buy a house because getting coverage could be difficult.

Deb Bryan, who sells real estate in Austin, says she had to contact nearly 150 insurance agents in Texas to find coverage for one house. She says the sellers lost eight offers because of insurance problems. The house didn't have toxic mold, but there had been recent leaks. The insurers feared the house could develop more water problems - and mold.

In the end, the homeowners replaced the air conditioner and roof and upgraded the wiring to get insurance. The house sold for $75,000 less than the $275,000 asking price.

In California, consumer crusader Erin Brockovich - the subject of a movie that starred Julia Roberts - sued her construction company for causing mold to grow in her new Los Angeles-area house. Many builders in the state are finding it difficult to get insurance to construct condominiums.

Homeowners plagued with toxic mold are suffering the most. Some people run out of insurance benefits and are forced to pay for their unsellable moldy house and a new dwelling. Those who can't afford two homes are sometimes forced into bankruptcy.

"People have a right to know that mold can make you homeless," says Pam Walker of Southfield, a suburb of Detroit. Her family moved out of their house because of health problems 24 days after buying it. Her insurance company didn't cover the mold-related water damage that environmental scientists discovered.

Walker, an office manager, is letting her house go into foreclosure. She has also worked with her boss, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., to draft legislation that would create a federal insurance fund for families whose insurers won't cover mold-related losses.

Old mold, new problem

Mold has been around forever, but only in the past 15 years has it emerged as a financial and health problem for homeowners. Many office buildings and schools with mold have been forced to close because workers and students got sick.

Entertainer Ed McMahon sued his insurance company for $20 million in April. He claims toxic mold at his Los Angeles home killed his dog.

The new Residences at the Ritz-Carlton in Washington, D.C., where basketball star Michael Jordan has a condo, is undergoing extensive renovations because of mold.

There are 100,000 types of mold, but only a few dozen are toxic and can cause health problems. These molds produce chemicals called mycotoxins that can cause rashes, seizures, unusual bleeding, respiratory problems and severe fatigue in some people.

No one knows for sure why mold problems are on the rise. Scientists say it could be due to modern construction methods. Newer houses have walls that contain cellulose, where mold can thrive. Because houses today are more airtight, indoor air quality is more likely to affect people's health.

"We are building houses that are going to be deadly," says Kaye Kilburn, a professor of medicine at the University of Southern California who has studied toxic mold.

Insurance companies didn't worry about mold until last year, when a homeowner won $32 million in a lawsuit against Farmers Insurance. A jury declared that Farmers had acted fraudulently and in bad faith when fixing water damage in Melinda Ballard's 22-room mansion in Dripping Springs, in central Texas.

Ballard, who founded Policyholders of America in January to help homeowners with similar mold claims, says the company delayed fixing a relatively small water leak, which turned into a giant mold problem.

The case, under appeal, spawned an insurance crisis in Texas as mold-related water claims began to proliferate. The state's top insurance carriers saw their mold claims skyrocket to more than 37,000 last year from 7,000 in 2000, according to the latest figures from the Texas insurance department. Settlements paid on those claims climbed to $854.3 million last year from $152.7 million in 2000.

As a result, State Farm Insurance stopped writing new homeowner policies in Texas last fall. Farmers and Allstate Insurance restricted mold claims related to water damage. Insurance rates started going up, tripling in some cases.

"It doesn't make any sense for us to bring in new business until we get control of this trend," says Keith Androff, a State Farm spokesman in Texas.

Today, Texas homeowners who want coverage for mold resulting from water damage need to buy an add-on to their policies. State Farm's add-on is so expensive that only 16% of its clients have mold coverage that was standard a year ago, Androff says.

"I feel incredibly lucky to get reduced coverage at increased rates," quips MaryAnn Selva of Dickinson, south of Houston. Her insurance coverage with CNA Lloyds of Texas was canceled in April because she filed two claims for water damage totaling $30,000 - neither involving mold.

Most insurance companies wanted her to pay an annual premium of $3,000, which is more than double her previous payment of $1,400. "The only thing it covered was if an airplane hit the house," she says. Eventually, she found coverage at a relative bargain: $2,100 a year.

Limiting settlements

Insurance companies in every state are trying to reduce mold coverage, which typically pays for mold cleanup only if it results from sudden water damage, such as a burst pipe. Insurance companies filed petitions in all 50 states last year to limit settlements. So far, 28 states have approved coverage caps ranging from $10,000 to $50,000.

The companies say they had to make drastic policy changes. "Unfortunately, if you've had a water claim, it could signal you'll have more water problems down the road," says Candysse Miller of the Insurance Information Institute, a non-profit group in New York.

Insurance companies, meanwhile, are suspicious about the proliferation of claims and lawsuits. "This has become the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow for trial lawyers who think this is the new asbestos of the world," says Jerry Davies, a spokesman for the Personal Insurance Federation in California, a lobbying group.

California insurance companies, which have the second highest number of mold claims in the country, have watched settlements jump in the past six months. The average claim increased to more than $36,000 from $3,000, Davies says. The companies also are fearful of proposed state legislation that would mandate insurers to cover mold claims.

Some consumer advocates say this insurance crisis has been largely manufactured by the insurers to cover other financial problems. All insurance companies suffered economically because of Sept. 11 and the declining stock market.

In addition, State Farm, which stopped writing new policies in California and Louisiana as well as Texas, lost $5 billion last year, in part because it had been selling policies below cost to keep its market share, says Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America.

As for the mold problems, consumer advocates say insurers take so long to fix homeowners' minor water problems that they become costly mold disasters. But the Texas insurance department says some delays, which on occasion exceed one year, are due to the huge increase in the number of claims and the need to wait for test results to confirm whether toxic mold is in someone's home.

The department says consumer complaints about mold claims jumped to 321 last year from five in 2000.

"All the industry wants to talk about is Melinda Ballard's $32 million verdict," says Dale Washington, a California attorney who has handled many mold cases. But, he says, Ballard's case wasn't really a mold claim. "It was a $32 million fraud claim."

Washington says he has seen insurance companies repeatedly withhold information from customers about the possible health effects of toxic mold.

Nancy Gerding of The Woodlands, near Houston, says State Farm stopped paying for alternative housing and insisted her home was habitable though her contractor kept finding mold.

She's borrowing against her 401(k) to rent a townhouse.

State Farm declined to comment on the Gerding case because she is suing the company.

"This is not right. It's un-American," Gerding says. "It's taking away the American dream."

on Feb 18, 2005
Interesting stories guys, but I notice that not a single one attributes the mold problems to drywalled basements. In fact, they all either state or imply that the problem originated elsewhere. Owens Corning itself does not say that it's product will prevent mold, and I'm guessing that the situation in the first case particularly would have caused mold regardless of the construction system used. I don't deny that there may be some benefit in being able to remove panels to get to wet walls, so perhaps these articles make a case for constructing an entire house out of removable wall panels. Nonetheless, my point here has not been to dismiss the OCBS system as a gimmick, but instead to criticize the tactics used to sell it. If it's the "Rolex" of basement refinishing systems, then I can either afford it or I can't, period. Why all the underhanded tactics (like pretending to call a manager and this-offer-is-good-for- tonight-only deals (which we all know is bull))? It simply cheapens the appeal and creates an air of skepticism, in my opinion. But truthfully, the real problem is not with Owens Corning, but rather the companies that are authorized to sell their product. Most of these businesses sell other home-improvement products (like windows) using the same tactics. I suppose it's been successful for them, but I don't find it to be the most honorable way to do business.
on Feb 18, 2005
There is no making people happy you see what you want to see. Drywall is drywall, cellulose is cellulose, you have an ax to grind we understand. Take it for what it is worth.
on Feb 18, 2005
No Stanley, no ax to grind. Just trying to get you folks to see both sides of the equation. But like you said, you see what you want to see.
on Feb 18, 2005
OUR SALESMAN DID EVERYTHING JUST THE WAY YOU DESCRIBED INCLUDING MAKING THAT CALL TO THE BOSS
FOR THE BEST BOTTOM LINE PRICE. HE GAVE US THE TAPE TO WATCH FROM BOB VILLA WHILE HE WORKED UP
A PRICE. WHEN HE GAVE US THE PRICE OF 58.00 PER SQ. I SAID " HEY WHAT HAPPENED TO THE 40.00 THAT
JEFF VANSLOAN TALKED ABOUT IN THE VIDEO"? WHICH BY THE WAY WAS COMPLETE WITH THE FLOORING. HE
WAS NEW AND DIDN'T REALIZE THAT MR. VANSLOAN TALKED ABOUT A PRICE. HE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE HIS
BOSS CALL US TO EXPLAIN.
I EXPLAINED HE HAD BETTER NOT SHOW THAT TAPE IN THE FUTURE. WE KEPT THE TAPE FOR EVIDENCE.
HAS ANYONE BEEN ABLE TO BUY THIS STUFF DIRECT FORM OWENS? MY FRIEND IS A LICENSED CONTRACTOR
AND HAS OFFERED TO HELP US INSTALL IT.
DOES ANYONE HAVE THE DIRECT PHONE NUMBER TO OWNENS CORNING? NOT THE FRACHISE BUT CORPORATE.
I WANT TO GET A HOLD OF THIS JEFF VANSLOAN AND ASK HIM A FEW QUESTIONS.

THANKS
on Feb 18, 2005
Again, the price per s.f. is dependent on the size of the room to the lineal feet of wall, with local labor rates working as an "x" factor. $40 a s.f. for the huge (750+ s.f.) room in the video in a subdivision built in a converted cow pasture in central Ohio is realistic -- just as $55 a s.f. for a <400 s.f. room in greater Boston/New York/Washington, D.C. would be. Its all relative.
on Feb 18, 2005
my house is brand new and the basement is a wood basement 16" studs on center 8' ceiling.
no pools and duct work recessed in the ceiling. i built the house with this in mind and when we
spoke to the OC people they said all the prep we did would save us a ton of money because
the walls are ready to go. we are in the suburbs of detroit. your just making me more upset
with the way i was treated. just to let you know i was on the phone with corp. today and they
know there is a big problem. they reallly barked up the wrong tree this time. when someone gives you a price that should be the best price. that doen's say much for the company. my
room by the way is 575 sq, ft.
on Feb 19, 2005
Does anyone know what states Champion is in with their basement system..
on Feb 19, 2005
Thanks allot for this site I bought the oc system last night from basement experts and now i will cancel my contract after reading this site!
on Feb 19, 2005
Bob, you are an idiot. You make a decision based on a website of anonymous people and rumor. Of course you did not buy a room. What type of weak minded buffoon makes his decision on a website??? I ran across one the other day about there not being a holocost...it was a fake!! So was the moon landing..Get a life and do some investigating on your own..it is at your fingertips.
To allover the map, get a grip, what do you think OC will do for you. There is no "problem" the problem is with people like you who want a BMW but want to pay a Chevy price. Buy the drywall...please. The Bob Villa tape is also 2 years old or more...Can't afford...can't have it. No biggie. Good luck on your crusade
on Feb 19, 2005
Bob,

From what I've seen, it's a nice system, so if you can afford it, and the business that is qualified to do it in your area has a good reputation, I wouldn't necessarily cancel it. As I noted in one of my earlier posts, the absolute best price I could get worked out to around $42 per square foot, and that was after I cancelled my contract and had a sales manager contact me. I'm currently having my basement finished in drywall, and the one advantage to the slower process that I have experienced is the ability to make little changes here and there as it progresses. I don't think I'd have been happy with some of my original ideas. Anyway, I don't think anyone out here is saying that the OC system isn't any good, but most of the negatives are questioning the sales tactics. If you felt comfortable with your sales rep, and trust you reveived a reasonable price, then it might be the system for you.
on Feb 20, 2005
Had Owens Corning salesman coming to our house yesterday. The guy was very professional. Didn't BS us with long history lessons about the company. Mentioned about the mold issues in basements, and showed us chart with average basement finishing costs in our state (CT). I made clear that I am familiar with the system, I've done research and I know exactly what I need done. I also mentioned that I know exactly how much is going to cost me if I finish the basement with drywall and was ready to do it before i found out about their basement system
The basement is 1200 sq ft. I need done 950 sq. ft., needs 4 doors - 3 interior to the unifinished storage area and to a walk-in closet and 1 exterior door. Trim around 2 windows, creating small service area (existing sump pump), some boxing around existing plumbing. His offer included drop ceiling, the basement system, all electrical with new sub-panel, 16 lights ( 1 light every 64 sq/ft). (wired in as many zones as i want), 2 phone jacks, 2 cable jacks, electric heater with thermostat. His first quote was around 38k ($41 sq. ft) good for 1 year. Second qoute if i buy the system now - 33k and after some negotiation and agreement that we will allow pictures taken and we will get the permit ourselfs - 31k which is ~ $33 sq. ft.
They will start in a month.
P.S. I asked for a quote if we do the ceiling and lighting ourselfs and they do the walls and electrical in the walls - 24k.
on Feb 20, 2005
I just had my pre-construction meeting with OC. The guy who came out was an expert on what needed to be done. After he reviewed all the plans that the sales rep provided he made some changes. The changes ended up costing me 9K less than what was originally quoted. My wife and I were more than happy with paying less instead of paying more. They are going to do everything except the carpet. The total cost for a 1,000 sq ft basement is 31K. The next step for us is to get the permits. We were told that it could take 4-6 weeks to get the permits. After that it will take 1 week to schedule the job and 2 weeks to complete it. Overall, we are very happy with the entire experience. I felt the salesman did a good job and we never felt any pressure. I'll keep everyone informed as the job begins. I live in NJ.
53 PagesFirst 32 33 34 35 36  Last